Paes-Sousa Romulo, Schramm Joyce Mendes de Andrade, Mendes Luiz Villarinho Pereira
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fiocruz Minas. Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Barro Preto. 30190-002 Belo Horizonte MG Brasil.
Centro de Estudos Estratégicos, Fiocruz. Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Dec;24(12):4375-4384. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182412.23232019. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
Fiscal austerity policies have been used as responses to economic crises and fiscal deficits in both developed and developing countries. While they vary in regard to their content, intensity and implementation, such models recommend reducing public expenses and social investments, retracting the public service and substituting the private sector in lieu of the State to provide certain services tied to social policies. The present article discusses the main effects of the recent economic crisis on public health based on an updated review with consideration for three dimensions: health risks, epidemiological profiles of different populations, and health policies. In Brazil, the combination of economic crisis and fiscal austerity policies is capable of producing a direr situation than those experienced in developed countries. The country is characterized by historically high levels of social inequality, an under-financed health sector, highly prevalent chronic degenerative diseases and persisting preventable infectious diseases. It is imperative to develop alternatives to mitigate the effects of the economic crisis taking into consideration not only the sustainability of public finance but also public well-being.
财政紧缩政策已被用于应对发达国家和发展中国家的经济危机和财政赤字。尽管这些政策在内容、强度和实施方面存在差异,但此类模式建议削减公共开支和社会投资,收缩公共服务,并让私营部门替代国家来提供某些与社会政策相关的服务。本文基于最新综述,从健康风险、不同人群的流行病学特征和健康政策这三个维度,探讨近期经济危机对公共卫生的主要影响。在巴西,经济危机与财政紧缩政策相结合可能会导致比发达国家所经历的情况更严峻的局面。该国的特点是社会不平等程度历来很高、卫生部门资金不足、慢性退行性疾病高度流行且可预防的传染病持续存在。必须制定替代方案来减轻经济危机的影响,不仅要考虑公共财政的可持续性,还要考虑公众福祉。