Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Uganda Youth Developmental Link, Kampala, Uganda.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):NP11736-NP11755. doi: 10.1177/0886260519889927. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
The purpose of this study is to examine the factors associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) among youth living in the slums of Kampala. This analysis is based on a cross-sectional study of youth living in the slums of Kampala conducted in spring 2014 ( = 1,134). The participants (12-18 years of age) were attending Uganda Youth Development Link centers, which serve youth living on the streets and slums of Kampala. Bivariate and multivariable multinomial analyses were conducted to examine risk factors associated with IPV victimization only, IPV perpetration only, and both IPV victimization and perpetration compared with no IPV victimization or perpetration. Among youth who reported having a boyfriend or girlfriend ( = 600), 18.3% ( = 110) reported experiencing both IPV victimization and perpetration, 11.0% ( = 66) reported IPV perpetration only, 7.7% ( = 46) reported experiencing IPV victimization only, and 63.0% ( = 378) reported no IPV experiences. In the multivariable analysis, IPV victimization only was associated with witnessing parental IPV (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.42, 5.48]), experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = [1.16, 4.46]), and neighborhood cohesiveness (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = [0.31, 1.69]). IPV perpetration was only associated with experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.86; 95% CI = [1.62, 5.07]). Reporting both IPV victimization and perpetration was associated with non-problem drinking (OR = 2.03; 95% CI = [1.15, 3.57]), problem drinking (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = [1.48, 4.74]), witnessing parental IPV (OR = 2.94; 95% CI = [1.80, 4.80]), experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.23; 95% CI = [1.38, 3.60]), and homelessness (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = [1.14, 3.16]). Levels of IPV victimization and perpetration are very high in this population and warrant urgent attention.
本研究旨在探讨居住在坎帕拉贫民窟的青少年中与亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)相关的因素。这项分析基于 2014 年春季对居住在坎帕拉贫民窟的青少年进行的横断面研究(= 1134)。参与者(12-18 岁)参加了乌干达青年发展联系中心,该中心为居住在坎帕拉街头和贫民窟的青少年提供服务。进行了双变量和多变量多项比例风险分析,以检查与 IPV 受害、仅 IPV 施暴、同时遭受 IPV 受害和施暴相关的风险因素,与无 IPV 受害或施暴相比。在报告有男朋友或女朋友的青少年中(= 600),18.3%(= 110)报告同时经历了 IPV 受害和施暴,11.0%(= 66)报告仅实施了 IPV 施暴,7.7%(= 46)报告仅遭受 IPV 受害,63.0%(= 378)报告没有经历过 IPV。在多变量分析中,仅遭受 IPV 与目睹父母之间的 IPV(比值比 [OR] = 2.78;95%置信区间 [CI] = [1.42, 5.48])、经历父母身体虐待(OR = 2.27;95% CI = [1.16, 4.46])和邻里凝聚力(OR = 0.73;95% CI = [0.31, 1.69])有关。仅实施 IPV 与经历父母身体虐待(OR = 2.86;95% CI = [1.62, 5.07])有关。同时报告遭受 IPV 受害和施暴与非问题饮酒(OR = 2.03;95% CI = [1.15, 3.57])、问题饮酒(OR = 2.65;95% CI = [1.48, 4.74])、目睹父母之间的 IPV(OR = 2.94;95% CI = [1.80, 4.80])、经历父母身体虐待(OR = 2.23;95% CI = [1.38, 3.60])和无家可归(OR = 1.90;95% CI = [1.14, 3.16])有关。在这一人群中,IPV 受害和施暴的水平非常高,需要紧急关注。