Suppr超能文献

结构化、主动的医疗协调护理与常规护理对改善脓毒症患者康复期医疗过渡期间发病率的比较(IMPACTS):一项实用、随机对照试验。

Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, 1540 Garden Terrace, Suite 308, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Nov 29;20(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis.

METHODS

The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs.

DISCUSSION

This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.

摘要

背景

脓毒症患者的住院死亡率最近有所下降,但脓毒症幸存者仍面临着显著的长期死亡率和发病率。目前只有有限的数据支持有效的策略来解决脓毒症患者出院后的管理问题。

方法

改善急性后护理期脓毒症患者的转归(IMPACTS)研究是在一个单一医疗服务系统内的 3 家医院进行的一项实用、随机对照试验,比较了接受常规护理的脓毒症幸存者与通过脓毒症转归和康复(STAR)计划接受治疗的患者之间的临床结局。STAR 计划包括一名位于中心的护士导航员,通过电话咨询和电子健康记录支持,在患者住院期间和出院后 30 天内促进最佳的脓毒症后护理策略,包括出院后药物审查、评估新的损伤或症状、监测现有合并症以及在适当情况下转介姑息治疗。通过急诊室入院的疑似感染患者(即开始使用抗生素、抽取细菌培养物),并根据先前开发的风险分层模型,认为有再次入院或死亡高风险的患者被纳入研究。符合条件的患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配到常规护理组(Arm 1)或 STAR 组(Arm 2)。计划在 6 个月内纳入 708 名患者。主要结局是出院后 30 天内全因再入院和死亡率的复合终点。次要结局包括 30 天和 90 天的再入院率、死亡率、急诊就诊次数、无急性护理的存活天数、急性护理和总费用。

讨论

这项实用评估提供了迄今为止对改善推荐的脓毒症后护理实施策略的最全面评估。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03865602。于 2019 年 3 月 6 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714d/6884908/3abefb777f4e/13063_2019_3792_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验