• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与痴呆症患者共同参与科学研究会议。来自全国痴呆症患者及其照护者的照护、服务和支持研究峰会的结果。

Contributions of Persons Living With Dementia to Scientific Research Meetings. Results From the National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.

机构信息

RAND Corporation (LF), Arlington, VA.

Alzheimer's Association (ES), Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.014
PMID:31784409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inclusion of patients in research activities has increased in the United States but no guidelines for inclusion of individuals with cognitive impairment exist. The experiences from the Persons Living with Dementia (PLWD) Stakeholder Group that formed to support the first National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers provided a test of feasibility of this type of participation for a major research meeting and an opportunity to understand specific contributions of the Group.

METHODS

The PLWD Stakeholder Group was formed by Summit co-chairs as one of six stakeholder groups charged with providing input into the Summit agenda and meeting recommendations. Members were recruited through clinician/researchers with personal knowledge of potential members. Following the Summit, Group members convened to review Group contributions to the Summit agenda, list of speakers, and Summit research recommendations.

RESULTS

The PLWD Group influenced the content of the Summit agenda and some Group members were invited to contribute through Summit presentations. The Group influenced Summit outcomes: of the 58 research recommendations that emerged, 30 express ideas contributed by the PLWD.

CONCLUSIONS

The Stakeholder Group for PLWD proved feasible to implement and impacted the agenda and output of a major national research meeting on dementia.

摘要

目的

在美国,将患者纳入研究活动的情况有所增加,但针对纳入认知障碍患者,尚无相关指导原则。为支持第一届全国痴呆症患者及其照护者护理、服务和支持研究峰会,成立了具有认知障碍患者生活经验的利益相关者团体(PLWD),以支持研究峰会,该团体对大型研究会议的这种参与形式进行了可行性测试,并为团体的具体贡献提供了机会。

方法

峰会联合主席成立了 PLWD 利益相关者团体,作为六个利益相关者团体之一,负责为峰会议程和会议建议提供投入。成员通过有潜在成员个人了解的临床医生/研究人员进行招募。峰会结束后,小组成员开会审议小组对峰会议程、演讲者名单和峰会研究建议的贡献。

结果

PLWD 小组影响了峰会议程的内容,一些小组成员应邀通过峰会演讲做出贡献。该小组影响了峰会的结果:在出现的 58 项研究建议中,有 30 项表达了 PLWD 的想法。

结论

PLWD 的利益相关者小组实施起来是可行的,并影响了全国性的痴呆症研究会议的议程和成果。

相似文献

1
Contributions of Persons Living With Dementia to Scientific Research Meetings. Results From the National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.与痴呆症患者共同参与科学研究会议。来自全国痴呆症患者及其照护者的照护、服务和支持研究峰会的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
2
The Experiences of Persons Living with Dementia Planning for a Dementia Research Meeting. Lessons Learned From the National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.与痴呆症共存的人的经历规划痴呆症研究会议。从国家痴呆症护理、服务和支持研究峰会以及痴呆症患者及其护理人员中学到的经验教训。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):434-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Participation of persons with dementia and their caregivers in research.痴呆症患者及其照护者参与研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1784-1792. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17340.
4
Advancing Research on Care Needs and Supportive Approaches for Persons With Dementia: Recommendations and Rationale.推进痴呆症患者的护理需求和支持方法的研究:建议和理由。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Communication in home care: Understanding the lived experiences of formal caregivers communicating with persons living with dementia.居家护理中的沟通:理解正式照护者与痴呆症患者沟通的生活体验。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Nov;16(6):e12401. doi: 10.1111/opn.12401. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
6
A research agenda for promoting continence for people living with dementia in the community: Recommendations based on a critical review and expert-by-experience opinion.促进社区中痴呆症患者的自理能力的研究议程:基于批判性评价和专家经验意见的建议。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1933-1946. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15537. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
7
Applying human-centered design to adapt the Jumpstart Guide for goals-of-care discussions in persons living with dementia.运用以人为中心的设计方法改编《Jumpstart 指南》,以促进痴呆患者的目标关怀讨论。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2111-2119. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18965. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Towards a Community-Based Dementia Care Strategy: How Do We Get There from Here?迈向基于社区的痴呆症护理策略:我们如何从现状实现目标?
Healthc Pap. 2016;16(2):8-32. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2017.25006.
9
Setting a National Agenda for Surgical Disparities Research: Recommendations From the National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons Summit.设定国家手术差异研究议程:来自美国国立卫生研究院和美国外科医师学会峰会的建议。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):554-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0014.
10
Chronic wounds in persons living with dementia: An integrative review.患有痴呆症者的慢性伤口:综合评价。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 May;17(3):e12447. doi: 10.1111/opn.12447. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Two new positive psychosocial measures for persons living with dementia.针对痴呆症患者的两项新的积极社会心理测量方法。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Feb 19;11(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70024. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
A retrospective analysis of mental well-being, nutritional status, and comorbidity burden in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎老年患者心理健康、营养状况及合并症负担的回顾性分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21970-7.
3
Two-year follow-up of dementia caregivers after a digital health intervention WECARE: a mixed-method study.
数字健康干预WECARE后痴呆症照料者的两年随访:一项混合方法研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Apr;29(4):631-638. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2449141. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
4
Moving beyond tokenism: Sustaining engagement of persons living with dementia in identifying emergency research priorities.超越形式主义:持续让痴呆症患者参与确定紧急研究重点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1344-1352. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19269. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
"When she goes out, she feels better:" co-designing a Green Activity Program with Hispanic/Latino people living with memory challenges and care partners.“外出时,她感觉好多了”:与患有记忆障碍的西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群及其护理伙伴共同设计绿色活动项目。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jun 18;16:1401255. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1401255. eCollection 2024.
6
A Systematic Review of Dementia Research Priorities.痴呆症研究重点的系统评价。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2024 Sep;37(5):343-354. doi: 10.1177/08919887241232647. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Development of a Lived Experience Panel to inform the design of embedded pragmatic trials of dementia care interventions.开发一个基于实际经验的小组,为痴呆症护理干预措施的嵌入式实用临床试验设计提供信息。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jan;72(1):139-148. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18621. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
8
Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review.阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症文献中的参与式研究方法:一项范围综述
Innov Aging. 2023 Aug 22;7(7):igad091. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad091. eCollection 2023.
9
Feasibility of conducting qualitative research with persons living with dementia and their caregivers during a home-delivered meals pilot trial.在一项上门送餐试点试验中,对痴呆症患者及其护理人员进行定性研究的可行性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Apr 22;9(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01302-5.
10
Cost effectiveness of non-drug interventions that reduce nursing home admissions for people living with dementia.减少痴呆症患者入住养老院的非药物干预措施的成本效益。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Sep;19(9):3867-3893. doi: 10.1002/alz.12964. Epub 2023 Apr 6.