• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用以人为中心的设计方法改编《Jumpstart 指南》,以促进痴呆患者的目标关怀讨论。

Applying human-centered design to adapt the Jumpstart Guide for goals-of-care discussions in persons living with dementia.

机构信息

Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2111-2119. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18965. Epub 2024 May 27.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.18965
PMID:38801253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11226381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Goals-of-care discussions (GOCD) are uncommon in persons living with dementia (PLWD) despite the likelihood of eventual loss of decisional capacity in the population. The Jumpstart Guide, an existing serious illness communication priming tool, can improve GOCD in certain populations, but has not previously been adapted for use among PLWD and their caregivers.

METHODS

Using human-centered design (HCD), we adapted the Jumpstart Guide for use with PLWD and their caregivers. We conducted qualitative interviews with clinicians and caregivers of PLWD. Six team members conducted qualitative rapid analysis of interviews leading to the development of summary templates and integrative matrices. Four iterations of the Jumpstart Guide led to the final version.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinicians and 11 caregivers were interviewed. Interviews provided key insights into the unique barriers PLWD and their caregivers face during GOCD, including discomfort with accepting a dementia diagnosis and concern with using "serious illness" to describe dementia, as is commonly done in palliative care. Clinicians described differences in GOCD with PLWD compared to other serious illnesses, and the challenge of getting patients and families to think about future health states. Interviews led to Jumpstart Guide adaptations in the following domains: (1) format and structure, (2) content, and (3) specific language. Suggested changes included prioritizing naming a decision-maker, changing conversation prompts to improve accessibility and understandability, ensuring the Jumpstart Guide could be used with patients as well as their caregivers, and altering language to avoid references to "serious illness" and "abilities."

CONCLUSION

Using HCD yielded valuable insights from clinicians and caregivers about the unique barriers to conducting GOCD among PLWD and their caregivers. These insights were used to adapt the Jumpstart Guide for use with PLWD and their caregivers, which is currently being tested in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in outpatient clinics.

摘要

背景

尽管人群中最终可能会丧失决策能力,但患有痴呆症的患者(PLWD)的目标关怀讨论(GOCD)仍然很少见。Jumpstart Guide 是一种现有的严重疾病沟通启动工具,可以改善某些人群的 GOCD,但之前并未针对 PLWD 及其护理人员进行改编。

方法

我们使用以人为中心的设计(HCD)对 Jumpstart Guide 进行改编,以用于 PLWD 及其护理人员。我们对 PLWD 的临床医生和护理人员进行了定性访谈。六名团队成员对访谈进行了定性快速分析,从而制定了总结模板和综合矩阵。经过四轮 Jumpstart Guide 的迭代,最终形成了最终版本。

结果

采访了 13 名临床医生和 11 名护理人员。访谈提供了有关 PLWD 和其护理人员在 GOCD 中面临的独特障碍的关键见解,包括对接受痴呆症诊断的不适感以及对使用“严重疾病”来描述痴呆症的担忧,因为这在姑息治疗中很常见。临床医生描述了与 PLWD 相比,GOCD 在其他严重疾病中的差异,以及让患者和家属考虑未来健康状况的挑战。访谈导致 Jumpstart Guide 在以下领域进行了改编:(1)格式和结构,(2)内容和(3)特定语言。建议的更改包括优先指定决策者,更改对话提示以提高可及性和可理解性,确保 Jumpstart Guide 可用于患者及其护理人员,以及改变语言以避免提及“严重疾病”和“能力”。

结论

使用 HCD 从临床医生和护理人员那里获得了有关在 PLWD 及其护理人员中进行 GOCD 的独特障碍的有价值的见解。这些见解被用于改编 Jumpstart Guide 以用于 PLWD 及其护理人员,目前正在门诊诊所进行实用随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Applying human-centered design to adapt the Jumpstart Guide for goals-of-care discussions in persons living with dementia.运用以人为中心的设计方法改编《Jumpstart 指南》,以促进痴呆患者的目标关怀讨论。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2111-2119. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18965. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
4
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
5
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
6
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
7
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
8
Perspectives and Experiences of Family Caregivers Using Supportive Mobile Apps in Dementia Care: Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research.痴呆症护理中使用支持性移动应用程序的家庭照顾者的观点与体验:定性研究的元综合分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 18;13:e65983. doi: 10.2196/65983.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
A qualitative systematic review of the role of families in supporting communication in people with dementia.一项关于家庭在支持痴呆症患者沟通方面作用的定性系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):1130-1153. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12738. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Views of Family Caregivers on Advance Care Planning in Advanced Dementia Care in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Thematic Content Analysis Study.香港晚期痴呆症护理中家庭照顾者对预先护理计划的看法:一项定性主题内容分析研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;8(7):e70983. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70983. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a Serious Illness Risk Prediction Model: Impact on Goals of Care Documentation.实施重病风险预测模型:对关怀目标文档记录的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):603-610.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Intervention to Promote Communication About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.促进与住院重症患者进行治疗目标沟通的干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jun 20;329(23):2028-2037. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8812.
3
Long-term Effect of Machine Learning-Triggered Behavioral Nudges on Serious Illness Conversations and End-of-Life Outcomes Among Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
机器学习触发的行为推动对癌症患者严重疾病对话和临终结局的长期影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):414-418. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6303.
4
US clinicians' perspectives on advance care planning for persons with dementia: A qualitative study.美国临床医生对痴呆症患者预先护理计划的看法:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1473-1484. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18197. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Association of Advance Care Planning Visits With Intensity of Health Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Serious Illness at the End of Life.预先医疗照护计划访视与末期重病医疗保险受益人医疗照护强度之关联性。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 30;2(7):e211829. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1829. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Systematic Review Revisited, 2010-2020: The Effect on Surrogates of Making Treatment Decisions for Others.系统综述再探讨:2010-2020 年,为他人做出治疗决策对代理人的影响。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;38(1):71-77. doi: 10.1177/08258597221098124. Epub 2022 May 22.
7
Efficacy of a Communication-Priming Intervention on Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions in Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对住院重症患者记录的目标关怀讨论的沟通启动干预的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088.
8
Trends in advance care planning and end-of-life care among persons living with dementia requiring surrogate decision-making.痴呆患者需要代理决策时的预先护理计划和临终关怀趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1394-1404. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17680. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in Dementia Prevention Trials: A Systematic Review.种族和少数民族人群在痴呆症预防试验中的代表性:系统评价。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(1):113-118. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.49.
10
The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices.以人为本的设计方法在健康研究和创新中的应用:当前实践的叙述性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. doi: 10.2196/28102.