Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54261-4.
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in PCa and is recommended for patients with a probability of lymph node invasion (LNI) >5%. However, the therapeutic role of PLND and its extent remains a debate. In this study, data of 20,668 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with and without PLND from SEER database between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a risk of LNI >5% according to 2012-Briganti nomogram. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between patients with and without PLND. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to evaluate the impacts of the PLND and its extent on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). In overall cohort, patients with PLND were associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics and had poorer survival compared to those without PLND (5-year CSS rate: 98.4% vs. 99.7%, p < 0.001; 5-year OS rate: 96.3% vs. 97.8%, p < 0.001). In the post-PSM cohort, no significant difference in survival was found between patients with and without PLND (5-year CSS rate: 99.4% vs. 99.7%, p = 0.479; 5-year OS rate: 97.3% vs. 97.8%, p = 0.204). In addition, the extent of PLND had no impact on prognosis (all p > 0.05). Subgroup analyses reported similar negative findings. In conclusion, neither PLND nor its extent was associated with survival in North American patients with a risk of LNI >5%. The cut-off point of 5% probability of LNI might be too low to show benefits in survival in patients underwent PLND.
盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是前列腺癌淋巴结分期的金标准,建议用于淋巴结侵犯概率(LNI)>5%的患者。然而,PLND 的治疗作用及其范围仍然存在争议。在这项研究中,我们回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2015 年间 SEER 数据库中接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)加或不加 PLND 的 20668 例患者的数据。所有患者根据 2012 年 Briganti 列线图,LNI 风险>5%。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡 PLND 组和非 PLND 组患者的基线特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归分析评估 PLND 及其范围对癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)的影响。在总体队列中,与无 PLND 组相比,PLND 组患者具有更具侵袭性的临床病理特征,生存较差(5 年 CSS 率:98.4%比 99.7%,p<0.001;5 年 OS 率:96.3%比 97.8%,p<0.001)。在 PSM 后队列中,有 PLND 和无 PLND 患者的生存无显著差异(5 年 CSS 率:99.4%比 99.7%,p=0.479;5 年 OS 率:97.3%比 97.8%,p=0.204)。此外,PLND 的范围对预后没有影响(均 p>0.05)。亚组分析报告了类似的阴性结果。总之,在 LNI 风险>5%的北美患者中,PLND 及其范围与生存无关。LNI 概率为 5%的截断值可能太低,无法显示 PLND 患者生存获益。