• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户体验可用性度量(UMUX-LITE)精简版是否是支持快速评估新医疗技术的可靠工具?

Is the LITE version of the usability metric for user experience (UMUX-LITE) a reliable tool to support rapid assessment of new healthcare technology?

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; The NIHR MIC London IVD Diagnostics, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of London, United Kingdom.

The NIHR MIC London IVD Diagnostics, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103007. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103007. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103007
PMID:31785449
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the reliability of a standardised, short-scale measure of satisfaction in the use of new healthcare technology i.e., the LITE version of the usability metric for user experience (UMUX-LITE). Whilst previous studies have demonstrated the reliability of UMUX-LITE, and its relationship with measures of likelihood to recommend a product, such as the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in other sectors no such testing has been undertaken with healthcare technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six point-of-care products at different stages of development were assessed by 120 healthcare professionals. UMUX-LITE was used to gather their satisfaction in use, and NPS to declare their intention to promote the product. Inferential statistics were used to: i) ascertain the reliability of UMUX-LITE, and ii) assess the relationship between UMUX-LITE and NPS at different stages of products development.

RESULTS

UMUX-LITE showed an acceptable reliability (α = 0.7) and a strong positive correlation with NPS (r = 0.455, p < .001). This is similar to findings in other fields of application. The level of product development did not affect the UMUX-LITE scores, while the stage of development was a significant predictor (R = 0.49) of the intention to promote.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Practitioners may apply UMUX-LITE alone, or in combination with the NPS, to complement interview and 'homemade' scales to investigate the quality of new products at different stages of development. This shortened scale is appropriate for use in the context of healthcare in which busy professionals have a minimal amount of time to support innovation.

摘要

目的

确定一种新的医疗保健技术(即用户体验可用性度量的精简版(UMUX-LITE))使用满意度的标准化短尺度测量的可靠性。虽然之前的研究已经证明了 UMUX-LITE 的可靠性,以及它与产品推荐可能性的衡量标准(如其他行业的净推荐值(NPS))之间的关系,但在医疗保健技术方面尚未进行过此类测试。

材料和方法

120 名医疗保健专业人员评估了处于不同开发阶段的 6 种即时护理产品。使用 UMUX-LITE 来收集他们对使用的满意度,使用 NPS 来声明他们推广产品的意愿。使用推理统计来:i)确定 UMUX-LITE 的可靠性,以及 ii)评估产品开发的不同阶段 UMUX-LITE 和 NPS 之间的关系。

结果

UMUX-LITE 表现出可接受的可靠性(α=0.7),与 NPS 呈强烈正相关(r=0.455,p<0.001)。这与其他应用领域的发现相似。产品开发的水平不会影响 UMUX-LITE 的分数,而开发阶段是促进意愿的重要预测指标(R=0.49)。

讨论和结论

从业者可以单独使用 UMUX-LITE,或者与 NPS 结合使用,以补充访谈和“自制”量表,在不同的开发阶段调查新产品的质量。这种缩短的量表适用于医疗保健领域,因为忙碌的专业人员支持创新的时间非常有限。

相似文献

1
Is the LITE version of the usability metric for user experience (UMUX-LITE) a reliable tool to support rapid assessment of new healthcare technology?用户体验可用性度量(UMUX-LITE)精简版是否是支持快速评估新医疗技术的可靠工具?
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103007. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103007. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
2
Measuring User Experience With 3, 5, 7, or 11 Points : Does It Matter?用 3、5、7 或 11 分制衡量用户体验:有区别吗?
Hum Factors. 2021 Sep;63(6):999-1011. doi: 10.1177/0018720819881312. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Designing for Improved Patient Experiences in Home Dialysis: Usability and User Experience Findings From User-Based Evaluation Study With Patients With Chronic Conditions.设计改善居家透析患者体验:基于患者的慢性疾病用户评估研究的可用性和用户体验发现。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 14;11:e53691. doi: 10.2196/53691.
4
The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care.开发并验证了加拿大卫生保健评估项目问卷(CANHELP Lite)的简化版:一种用于衡量患者和家属对临终关怀满意度的新工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample.社区样本中体重对生活质量简易问卷(IWQOL-lite)影响的心理测量学评估。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Mar;11(2):157-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1015081805439.
6
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.可用性问题不会自行解决:芬兰医生使用电子健康记录的全国性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity.一种评估肥胖症患者生活质量的简短测量方法的开发。
Obes Res. 2001 Feb;9(2):102-11. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.13.
8
Developing a Newborn Resuscitation Telemedicine Program: A Follow-Up Study Comparing Two Technologies.开展新生儿复苏远程医疗项目:两种技术的随访比较研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):589-596. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0319. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Usability evaluation with mental health professionals and young people to develop an Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy program for adolescents with anxiety disorders.与心理健康专业人员和年轻人一起进行可用性评估,以开发一个针对焦虑症青少年的基于互联网的认知行为治疗项目。
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Dec 16;15:213. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0534-1.
10
Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability.少即是多?四种感知易用性度量方法的实验比较。
Hum Factors. 2025 Jan;67(1):32-48. doi: 10.1177/00187208241237862. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambient Documentation Technology in Clinician Experience of Documentation Burden and Burnout.临床医生在文档负担和职业倦怠体验中的环境文档技术
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528056. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28056.
2
Data Dashboard Acceptability, Use, and Perceived Effectiveness in Disseminating Local Overdose Data and Resources in a Rural New York State County: A Cross-Sectional Study.纽约州农村某县数据仪表板在传播本地过量用药数据及资源方面的可接受性、使用情况和感知有效性:一项横断面研究
Online J Public Health Inform. 2025 Jul 10;17:e68977. doi: 10.2196/68977.
3
Controlled Pilot Intervention Study on the Effects of an AI-Based Application to Support Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and Pressure Injury Assessment, Nursing Care and Documentation: Study Protocol.
基于人工智能的应用程序对支持失禁相关性皮炎和压力性损伤评估、护理及记录影响的对照试验性干预研究:研究方案
Res Nurs Health. 2025 Aug;48(4):419-428. doi: 10.1002/nur.22469. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
4
Assessment and Intervention for Diabetes Distress in Primary Care Using Clinical and Technological Interventions: Protocol for a Single-Arm Pilot Trial.使用临床和技术干预措施对初级保健中的糖尿病困扰进行评估和干预:单臂试点试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 31;14:e62916. doi: 10.2196/62916.
5
The first AI-based Chatbot to promote HIV self-management: A mixed methods usability study.首个促进HIV自我管理的基于人工智能的聊天机器人:一项混合方法可用性研究。
HIV Med. 2025 Feb;26(2):184-206. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13720. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Adapting and Evaluating an AI-Based Chatbot Through Patient and Stakeholder Engagement to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions: Master Protocol for an Adaptive Platform Trial (the MARVIN Chatbots Study).通过患者和利益相关者参与来调整和评估基于人工智能的聊天机器人,以提供针对不同健康状况的信息:适应性平台试验的主方案(MARVIN聊天机器人研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 13;13:e54668. doi: 10.2196/54668.
7
Advances in prosthetic technology: a perspective on ethical considerations for development and clinical translation.假肢技术的进展:关于开发与临床转化的伦理考量视角
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 16;4:1335966. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1335966. eCollection 2023.
8
The NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey: Cross-Sectional Study of National Patient Portal Users in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia.NORDeHEALTH 2022 患者调查:挪威、瑞典、芬兰和爱沙尼亚国家患者门户用户的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 13;25:e47573. doi: 10.2196/47573.
9
Mental Health Chatbot for Young Adults With Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Blind, Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.新冠疫情期间抑郁症状青年使用心理健康聊天机器人:单盲、三臂随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 21;24(11):e40719. doi: 10.2196/40719.
10
Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.芬兰患者对基于网络的电子健康记录访问的体验:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438. doi: 10.2196/37438.