Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal; Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Orthopaedics Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
School of Medicine, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3304-3315.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.005.
To scope the scientific literature and analyze the influence of bony risk factors for degenerative full-thickness primary rotator cuff tear.
A systematic review of databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed up to June 30, 2018. Meta-analysis was performed with mean difference (MD) or risk ratio for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff injury, and when there were ≥3 studies for the considered potential risk factor. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
We analyzed 34 studies comprising 5,916 shoulders (3,369 shoulders with rotator cuff tear and 2,546 controls) and identified 19 potential risk factors for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There was moderate evidence that a higher critical shoulder angle (MD = 4.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43 to 5.39), higher acromion index (MD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.09), and lower lateral acromion angles (MD = -7.11, 95% CI -8.32 to -5.90) were associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears compared with controls. Moderate evidence showed that a type III acromion significantly increases the risk for full-thickness degenerative rotator cuff tear (risk ratio = 2.26, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.70).
There is moderate evidence that larger critical shoulder angle, higher acromion index, lower lateral acromion angles, and a type III acromion are significantly associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Other potential risk factors identified showed insufficient evidence.
Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.
对医学文献进行系统回顾分析,探讨骨性危险因素对退行性全层原发性肩袖撕裂的影响。
检索 PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时限截至 2018 年 6 月 30 日。对退行性全层肩袖损伤相关的潜在危险因素进行系统回顾分析,当某一潜在危险因素有≥3 项研究时,采用均数差(MD)或风险比(RR)进行 Meta 分析。采用 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估研究方法学质量。
共纳入 34 项研究,包含 5916 个肩关节(3369 个肩袖撕裂,2546 个正常),共分析了 19 个退行性全层肩袖撕裂的潜在危险因素。有中等质量证据表明,较大的临界肩角(MD=4.41,95%可信区间[CI] 3.435.39)、较高的肩峰指数(MD=0.06,95%CI 0.040.09)和较低的外侧肩峰角(MD=-7.11,95%CI-8.32-5.90)与对照组相比,更易发生退行性全层肩袖撕裂。有中等质量证据表明,Ⅲ型肩峰显著增加全层退行性肩袖撕裂的风险(RR=2.26,95%CI 1.383.70)。
有中等质量证据表明,较大的临界肩角、较高的肩峰指数、较低的外侧肩峰角和Ⅲ型肩峰与退行性全层肩袖撕裂显著相关,其他潜在危险因素的证据不足。
IV 级,系统评价 II~IV 级研究。