• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI 靶向活检在前列腺癌检测中的应用:指南是否改变了我们的实践和前列腺癌检出率?

MRI-targeted biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: have the guidelines changed our practices and our prostate cancer detection rate?

机构信息

Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Apr;52(4):611-618. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02353-5. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-019-02353-5
PMID:31786702
Abstract

PURPOSE

In our center, until 2018, MRI-targeted biopsy was underused. Since January 2018, we systematically performed MRI-targeted biopsy for suspicious PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions in accordance to the recent guidelines. We hypothesized that the implementation of systematic prebiopsy MRI would increase the detection rate (DR) of prostate cancer (PCa) without increasing DR of clinically insignificant PCa (insignPCa).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study including consecutive men who underwent prostate biopsy for suspicion of PCa in our center between January 2017 and December 2018 was conducted. Combined biopsies were performed for suspicious MRI and systematic biopsies for nonsuspicious MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the DR of PCa per year. Secondary outcomes included DRs of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and insignPCa between both years and outcomes of targeted vs systematic biopsies.

RESULTS

A total of 306 men (152 in 2017 and 154 in 2018) were included. Respectively, median (IQR) age was 69 (63-75) vs 70 (65-76) years (p = 0.29) and median (IQR) PSA density was 0.17 (0.13-0.28) vs 0.17 (0.11-0.26) (p = 0.24). There was a significant increase in prebiopsy MRI performed (120 [78.9%] vs 143 [92.8%]; p < 0.001) in 2018. DRs of PCa (94 [61.8%] vs 112 [72.7%]; p = 0.04) and csPCa (76 [50%] vs 95 [61.6%]; p = 0.04) increased in 2018, while the insignPCa DR was stable (p = 0.13). The DR of PCa was 58.3%, 65% and 71.2%, respectively, in targeted, systematic and combined biopsies (p = 0.02). In case of nonsuspicious MRI, the prevalence of csPCA was 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing systematical MRI-targeted biopsy in our clinical setting increased the PCa DR without overdiagnosing insignPCa. Implementation of prebiopsy MRI does not seem to avoid the need for systematic biopsy, and nonsuspicious MRI should not obviate the need for prostate biopsy when otherwise clinically indicated.

摘要

目的

在我们中心,直到 2018 年,磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检的应用都较少。自 2018 年 1 月以来,我们根据最新指南,对可疑前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分≥3 的病变系统地进行了 MRI 靶向活检。我们假设实施系统的活检前 MRI 会提高前列腺癌(PCa)的检出率(DR),而不会增加临床意义不大的 PCa(insignPCa)的检出率。

患者和方法

我们对 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在我们中心因怀疑 PCa 而接受前列腺活检的连续男性进行了一项回顾性研究。可疑 MRI 行联合活检,可疑 MRI 行系统活检。主要结局是比较每年 PCa 的检出率(DR)。次要结局包括两年间临床显著 PCa(csPCa)和 insignPCa 的检出率以及靶向与系统活检的结果。

结果

共纳入 306 名男性(2017 年 152 名,2018 年 154 名)。分别为中位(IQR)年龄为 69(63-75)岁 vs 70(65-76)岁(p=0.29)和中位(IQR)PSA 密度为 0.17(0.13-0.28)ng/ml vs 0.17(0.11-0.26)ng/ml(p=0.24)。2018 年活检前 MRI 检查的比例显著增加(120[78.9%] vs 143[92.8%];p<0.001)。2018 年 PCa(94[61.8%] vs 112[72.7%];p=0.04)和 csPCa(76[50%] vs 95[61.6%];p=0.04)的检出率增加,而 insignPCa 的检出率保持稳定(p=0.13)。靶向、系统和联合活检的 PCa 检出率分别为 58.3%、65%和 71.2%(p=0.02)。在非可疑 MRI 的情况下,csPCA 的患病率为 12.5%。

结论

在我们的临床环境中引入系统的 MRI 靶向活检提高了 PCa 的检出率,而不会过度诊断 insignPCa。活检前 MRI 的应用似乎并没有避免系统活检的需要,当临床上需要时,非可疑 MRI 并不能避免前列腺活检的需要。

相似文献

1
MRI-targeted biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: have the guidelines changed our practices and our prostate cancer detection rate?MRI 靶向活检在前列腺癌检测中的应用:指南是否改变了我们的实践和前列腺癌检出率?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Apr;52(4):611-618. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02353-5. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
2
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
Interaction of patient age and high-grade prostate cancer on targeted biopsies of MRI suspicious lesions.患者年龄和高级别前列腺癌对 MRI 可疑病变靶向活检的影响。
BJU Int. 2024 Jul;134(1):128-135. doi: 10.1111/bju.16341. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.多参数磁共振成像与靶向活检联合系统活检与单纯系统活检诊断前列腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8427.
5
Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?在磁共振成像引导下前列腺靶向活检的时代,对于之前活检阴性的患者,是否仍需要重复进行系统性活检?
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
6
Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.优化联合磁共振成像(MRI)靶向和系统活检策略:在仅存在外周多参数MRI可疑病变的情况下,保留多参数MRI阴性的移行区。
J Urol. 2022 Feb;207(2):333-340. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002248. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary?可疑性前活检多参数 MRI:前列腺活检仍有必要吗?
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4160-4165. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02728-8. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.活检前多参数磁共振成像(MRI)、活检指征与MRI-超声融合靶向前列腺活检结果之间的关系
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
9
Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.在初次活检的患者中,根据 PSA 水平比较 TRUS 引导下活检与 MRI 靶向活检的癌症检出率:倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.经前列腺磁共振成像双参数预处理对初次活检的临床显著前列腺癌诊断的影响。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Feb;54(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1711161. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of a magnetic resonance imaging-based algorithm for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像的预测前列腺癌侧别特异性包膜外侵犯算法的外部验证
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):327-333. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0128.R2. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
2
Systematic biopsy should not be omitted in the era of combined magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies of the prostate.在前列腺磁共振成像/超声融合引导活检的时代,系统活检不应被忽视。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Nov;53(11):2251-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02989-2. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.靶向与系统前列腺活检在初次活检的男性中的比较:前列腺癌的图像配准前瞻性评估(PAIREDCAP)研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1734.
2
Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.用于检测前列腺癌的前列腺磁共振成像(MRI),无论是否进行MRI靶向活检及系统活检。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
3
2019 年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级共识会议。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Aug;44(8):e87-e99. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001497.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Significantly Improves the Risk Prediction for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
磁共振成像定义的前列腺特异性抗原密度显著改善了活检时临床显著性前列腺癌的风险预测。
Urology. 2019 Apr;126:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
5
MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: do we need to add standard sampling? A review of the last 5 years.磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断中的应用:我们是否需要增加标准采样?对过去 5 年的回顾。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):473-487. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0071-8. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
7
Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.在未经活检的患者中,比较经直肠超声引导活检与磁共振成像及后续磁共振成像引导活检检测前列腺癌的诊断准确性的前瞻性非随机研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Dec;69(6):589-595. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02845-4.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
Accuracy of Elastic Fusion of Prostate Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images under Routine Conditions: A Prospective Multi-Operator Study.常规条件下前列腺磁共振与经直肠超声图像弹性融合的准确性:一项前瞻性多操作者研究
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0169120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169120. eCollection 2016.
10
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?比较三种不同的磁共振成像靶向前列腺活检技术:腔内与磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合与认知配准的系统评价。哪种技术更优?
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25.