Hisada Masayuki, Katsumata Kenji, Ishizaki Tetsuo, Enomoto Masanobu, Matsudo Takaaki, Kasuya Kazuhiko, Tsuchida Akihiko
Masayuki Hisada, Kenji Katsumata, Tetsuo Ishizaki, Masanobu Enomoto, Takaaki Matsudo, Kazuhiko Kasuya, Akihiko Tsuchida, Department of Digestive Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16707-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16707.
To investigate how complete laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE), as a novel minimally invasive surgery, compares to conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Twenty patients who underwent complete laparoscopic anterior resection with NOSE and 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted anterior resection by the conventional method between 2011 and 2012 were studied. Selection for complete laparoscopic anterior resection with NOSE was decided on the basis of tumor size, localization of the tumor, and body mass index. Outcomes related to surgery, including operation time, postoperative wound pain, hospital stay after surgery, the number of totally dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications (suture failure and wound infection), and anal function, were reviewed retrospectively. Anal function was assessed at 3 and 6 mo after surgery using the Wexner fecal incontinence scoring system.
Complete laparoscopic resection with NOSE was performed to completion in all 20 patients. There was no patient emergency that required conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The comparison between complete laparoscopic resection with NOSE and conventional laparoscopic surgery showed no significant differences in the maximal diameter of the tumor, number of totally dissected lymph nodes, bleeding volume, mean operation time, time to start of oral ingestion, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. On the other hand, with regard to pain after epidural anesthesia, the total usage of analgesia in this novel surgical technique was 1.85 ± 1.8 times, whereas it was 5.89 ± 2.86 in conventional laparoscopic surgery (P < 0.001). The postoperative pain period was 1.9 ± 1.9 d in this novel surgical technique, whereas it was 3.43 ± 1.41 d in conventional laparoscopic surgery (P < 0.004). In complete laparoscopic surgery with NOSE, the mean postoperative follow-up period was 20 mo (range: 12-30 mo). Neither local recurrence nor remote metastasis was observed during the follow-up period.
Complete laparoscopic anterior resection using NOSE does not require any incision and has excellent cosmetic properties, with mitigated postoperative pain.
探讨作为一种新型微创手术的完全腹腔镜下前切除术加经自然腔道取标本(NOSE)与传统腹腔镜手术相比的情况。
研究了2011年至2012年间接受完全腹腔镜下前切除术加NOSE的20例患者以及接受传统方法腹腔镜辅助前切除术的50例患者。完全腹腔镜下前切除术加NOSE的选择基于肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置和体重指数来决定。回顾性分析与手术相关的结果,包括手术时间、术后伤口疼痛、术后住院时间、完全清扫的淋巴结数量、术后并发症(缝合失败和伤口感染)以及肛门功能。术后3个月和6个月使用韦克斯纳大便失禁评分系统评估肛门功能。
20例患者均成功完成完全腹腔镜下切除术加NOSE。没有患者出现需要转为传统腹腔镜手术或开放手术的紧急情况。完全腹腔镜下切除术加NOSE与传统腹腔镜手术的比较显示,在肿瘤最大直径、完全清扫的淋巴结数量、出血量、平均手术时间、开始经口进食时间、术后住院时间和术后并发症方面没有显著差异。另一方面,关于硬膜外麻醉后的疼痛,这种新型手术技术的镇痛总用量为1.85±1.8倍,而传统腹腔镜手术为5.89±2.86(P<0.001)。这种新型手术技术的术后疼痛期为1.9±1.9天,而传统腹腔镜手术为3.43±1.41天(P<0.004)。在完全腹腔镜下NOSE手术中,术后平均随访期为20个月(范围:12 - 30个月)。随访期间未观察到局部复发或远处转移。
使用NOSE的完全腹腔镜下前切除术无需任何切口,具有出色的美容效果,术后疼痛减轻。