From the Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway (S.E.K., T.G.v.L., O.A.S., K.W., N.M., A.S.W.).
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (S.E.K., O.A.S.).
Hypertension. 2020 Jan;75(1):23-32. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14057. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Current cardiovascular pharmacotherapy targets maladaptive overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which occurs throughout the continuum of cardiovascular disease spanning from hypertension to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Over the past 16 years, 4 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials using candesartan, perindopril, irbesartan, and spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) failed to demonstrate increased efficacy of RAAS blockade added to guideline-directed medical therapy. We reappraise these trials and their weaknesses, which precluded statistically significant findings. Recently, dual-acting RAAS blockade with sacubitril-valsartan relative to stand-alone valsartan failed to improve outcome in the PARAGON-HF trial (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared with Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction). The majority of patients with HFpEF experience hypertension, frequently with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction, contributed to by comorbidities such as coronary disease, diabetes mellitus, overweight, and atrial fibrillation. Contrasting the findings in HFpEF, trials evaluating RAAS blockade on either side of HFpEF on the cardiovascular continuum in patients with high-risk hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, respectively, showed positive outcomes. We do not have a biologically plausible explanation for such divergent efficacy of RAAS blockade. Based on considerations of well-established clinical efficacy in hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and the shortcomings of aforementioned clinical trials in HFpEF, we argue that RAAS blockers including MRAs (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; aldosterone antagonists) should be used in the treatment of patients with HFpEF.
当前心血管药物治疗的目标是针对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的失调过度激活进行治疗,这种失调在心血管疾病的整个连续体中都存在,从高血压到射血分数降低的心力衰竭。在过去的 16 年中,四项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验使用坎地沙坦、培哚普利、厄贝沙坦和螺内酯治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者,但未能证明 RAAS 阻断加指南指导的药物治疗的疗效增加。我们重新评估了这些试验及其局限性,这些局限性排除了统计学上的显著发现。最近,与单独使用缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的双重作用 RAAS 阻断在 PARAGON-HF 试验(LCZ696 与缬沙坦比较在射血分数保留心力衰竭患者中的疗效和安全性)中未能改善结局。大多数 HFpEF 患者患有高血压,经常伴有亚临床左心室功能障碍,这是由合并症引起的,如冠状动脉疾病、糖尿病、超重和心房颤动。与 HFpEF 的发现形成对比的是,分别在高危高血压和射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的心血管连续体中评估 RAAS 阻断在 HFpEF 两侧的试验显示出积极的结果。我们没有一个生物学上合理的解释来解释 RAAS 阻断的这种不同疗效。基于在高血压和射血分数降低的心力衰竭中已经确立的临床疗效以及上述 HFpEF 临床试验的局限性,我们认为 RAAS 阻滞剂,包括 MRAs(盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂;醛固酮拮抗剂),应该用于 HFpEF 患者的治疗。