Department of Psychology.
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;44(1):60-70. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000356. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
The (1966) decision was intended to protect individuals' rights in custodial situations. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate abilities of individuals with intellectual disability and evaluate the utility of intelligence in predicting these abilities. Additionally, we aimed to provide an updated resource for forensic examiners regarding the performance of individuals with intellectual disability on the Standardized Assessment of Abilities (SAMA).
We hypothesized that IQ, particularly verbal intelligence and working memory, would significantly predict abilities related to recall, vocabulary, knowledge, and acquiescence in a sample with intellectual disability.
Sixty-two individuals diagnosed with intellectual disability completed the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-4th ed. (WAIS-IV), the SAMA, and a background questionnaire.
Participants demonstrated significantly worse abilities when compared to the normative sample of the SAMA apart from acquiescence, which they demonstrated at significantly higher rates. Participants exhibited limited existing knowledge of rights and showed minimal improvement following exposure to a warning. Verbal abilities were a significant predictor of recall and vocabulary abilities with large effect sizes on average (i.e., s > 1). IQ was not predictive of misconceptions about or acquiescence.
Verbal intelligence was an important contributor to understanding This study provided data related to performance on the SAMA by a sample of individuals with intellectual disability. It may serve as a reference for evaluators, legal professionals, and law enforcement officers when working with justice-involved persons with suspected intellectual disability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
1966 年的这项裁决旨在保护被监禁者的个人权利。本文旨在评估智障人士的能力,并评估智力在预测这些能力方面的作用。此外,我们旨在为法医评估人员提供有关智障人士在标准化能力评估(SAMA)中表现的最新资源。
我们假设智商,特别是言语智商和工作记忆,将显著预测智障人群在回忆、词汇、知识和默认方面的能力。
62 名被诊断为智障的个体完成了韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)、SAMA 和背景问卷。
与 SAMA 的常模样本相比,参与者在回忆和词汇能力方面的表现明显较差,而在默认方面的表现明显较高。参与者对权利的现有知识有限,在接触警告后仅表现出最小的改善。言语能力是预测回忆和词汇能力的重要因素,平均效应量较大(即 s > 1)。智商不能预测对权利的误解或默认。
言语智力是理解权利的一个重要因素。本研究提供了智障人士 SAMA 测试表现的数据。当涉及到有涉嫌智力障碍的司法涉案人员时,它可以为评估人员、法律专业人员和执法人员提供参考。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。