Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Autism Res. 2022 May;15(5):904-914. doi: 10.1002/aur.2690. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
We investigate whether autistic people's vulnerability is taken into account at each stage of the criminal justice system (CJS). Defense lawyers from 12 nations were included in the study although the sample was predominantly from the UK. Lawyers completed an online survey regarding one case in which they had defended an autistic client between January 2015 and January 2020; and on one case in which they had defended a nonautistic client charged with a similar offense, to provide a comparison group. Ninety-three lawyers (85% in the UK) reported on one autistic case, and 53 also reported on one nonautistic case. 75% of autistic clients were not given reasonable adjustments during the process. Only 43% were offered an appropriate adult during police investigations, even though they had an existing diagnosis of autism. 59% of prosecution barristers and 46% of judges said or did something during the trial that made the lawyers concerned that they did not have an adequate understanding of autism. Lawyers were 7.58 times more likely to be concerned about their autistic client's effective participation in court and were 3.83 times more likely to be concerned that their autistic clients would engage in self-harm, compared with their nonautistic clients. There is a failure to identify and address autistic peoples' disability within the CJS. There is a need for mandatory autism training for police officers and the judiciary, with a focus on identifying autism and understanding the needs of autistic people so that reasonable adjustments are offered in all cases. LAY SUMMARY: This study sought to investigate if the needs of autistic people are being overlooked by the police and other professionals within the CJS. Results show that autistic people are not always given the support they need during police questioning or in court. The experience of being involved with the police may also have a more negative impact on autistic peoples' mental health than that of nonautistic people.
我们研究了在刑事司法系统(CJS)的各个阶段是否考虑到了自闭症患者的脆弱性。该研究纳入了来自 12 个国家的辩护律师,但样本主要来自英国。律师们在线完成了一项调查,内容是他们在 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间为一名自闭症客户辩护的一个案件,以及他们为一名被控犯有类似罪行的非自闭症客户辩护的一个案件,以提供对照组。93 名律师(85%在英国)报告了一个自闭症案例,53 名律师还报告了一个非自闭症案例。在这个过程中,75%的自闭症患者没有得到合理的调整。只有 43%的自闭症患者在警方调查期间被提供了适当的成年人陪同,尽管他们已经被诊断出患有自闭症。59%的检控大律师和 46%的法官在审判期间说了或做了一些让律师担心他们对自闭症没有足够了解的事情。律师们更有可能担心他们的自闭症客户在法庭上的有效参与,也更有可能担心他们的自闭症客户会自残,而不是他们的非自闭症客户。在刑事司法系统中,没有发现和解决自闭症患者的残疾问题。警察和司法机构需要进行强制性的自闭症培训,重点是识别自闭症和了解自闭症患者的需求,以便在所有案件中提供合理的调整。