Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St., LH 118, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01028-4. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Evaluate income disparities in receipt of needle biopsy among Medicare beneficiaries and describe the magnitude of this variation across physician peer groups.
The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was queried from 2007-2009. Physician peer groups were constructed. The magnitude of income disparities and the patient-level and physician peer group-level effects were assessed.
Among 9770 patients, 65.4% received needle biopsy. Patients with low income (median area-level household income < $33K) were less likely to receive needle biopsy (58.5%) compared to patients with high income (≥ $50K) (68.6%; adjusted odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.91). Needle biopsy varied substantially across physician peer groups (interquartile range 43.4-81.9%). The magnitude of the disparity ranged from an odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95% CI 0.23-1.07) for low vs. high income patients to 1.27 (95% CI 0.60-2.68). The effect of being treated by a physician peer group that treated mostly low-income patients on receipt of needle biopsy was nearly three times the effect of being a low-income patient.
Needle biopsy continues to be underused and disparities by income exist. The magnitude of this disparity varies substantially across physician peer groups, suggesting that further work is needed to improve quality and reduce inequities.
评估医疗保险受益人群接受针吸活检的收入差距,并描述这种差异在医生同行群体之间的程度。
利用 2007-2009 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库进行查询。构建医生同行群体。评估收入差距的程度以及患者层面和医生同行群体层面的影响。
在 9770 名患者中,有 65.4%接受了针吸活检。与高收入(≥50K)患者(68.6%)相比,低收入(中位地区家庭收入<33K)患者接受针吸活检的可能性较低(58.5%)(调整后比值比 0.77;95%置信区间 0.65-0.91)。医生同行群体之间的针吸活检差异很大(四分位间距 43.4-81.9%)。差异的程度从低收入与高收入患者之间的比值比(OR)0.50(95%置信区间 0.23-1.07)到低收入与高收入患者之间的 1.27(95%置信区间 0.60-2.68)。接受主要治疗低收入患者的医生同行群体治疗的患者与低收入患者相比,接受针吸活检的可能性几乎增加了三倍。
针吸活检的应用仍然不足,且存在收入差距。这种差异的程度在医生同行群体之间存在显著差异,这表明需要进一步努力提高质量并减少不公平现象。