• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physician peer group characteristics and timeliness of breast cancer surgery.医生同伴群体特征与乳腺癌手术及时性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):657-665. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4789-8. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
Income disparities in needle biopsy patients prior to breast cancer surgery across physician peer groups.乳腺癌手术前,不同医生群体间的针吸活检患者的收入差距。
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01028-4. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Surgeon peer network characteristics and adoption of new imaging techniques in breast cancer: A study of perioperative MRI.外科医生同行网络特征与乳腺癌新成像技术的采用:一项围手术期 MRI 研究。
Cancer Med. 2018 Dec;7(12):5901-5909. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1821. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Physician trajectories of abandoning long-course breast radiotherapy and their cost impact.放弃长程乳腺癌放射治疗的医生路径及其成本影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):497-506. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13572. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
5
Disparities in the Initial Local Treatment of Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.老年早期乳腺癌女性初始局部治疗的差异:一项基于人群的研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):735-744. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5639. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.社会传播对乳腺癌医生采用先进影像检查的影响
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw330.
7
Surgeon characteristics and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性患者的外科医生特征与辅助放疗的接受情况
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 6;100(3):199-206. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm320. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
8
9
Delay of Surgery for Melanoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的黑色素瘤手术延迟。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Jul;151(7):731-41. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.119.
10
Severity of comorbid conditions and early-stage breast cancer therapy: linked SEER-Medicare data from 1993 to 2005.合并症严重程度与早期乳腺癌治疗:来自 1993 年至 2005 年的 SEER-Medicare 相关数据。
Cancer Med. 2013 Aug;2(4):526-36. doi: 10.1002/cam4.66. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Surgeon and Care Team Network Measures and Timely Breast Cancer Treatment.外科医生和护理团队网络措施与及时乳腺癌治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2427451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27451.
3
Network approaches and interventions in healthcare settings: A systematic scoping review.网络方法和干预措施在医疗保健环境中的应用:系统范围界定综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0282050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282050. eCollection 2023.
4
Breast Cancer Disparities and the COVID-19 Pandemic.乳腺癌差异与新冠疫情
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022;14(4):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s12609-022-00458-y. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Disparities in Time to Treatment for Breast Cancer: Shifting Focus to the Root Cause.乳腺癌治疗时间的差异:将重点转向根本原因。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6520-6521. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11948-9. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
A measure of local uniqueness to identify linchpins in a social network with node attributes.一种用于识别具有节点属性的社交网络中关键节点的局部独特性度量方法。
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6. doi: 10.1007/s41109-021-00400-8. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
7
Physician trajectories of abandoning long-course breast radiotherapy and their cost impact.放弃长程乳腺癌放射治疗的医生路径及其成本影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):497-506. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13572. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
8
Income disparities in needle biopsy patients prior to breast cancer surgery across physician peer groups.乳腺癌手术前,不同医生群体间的针吸活检患者的收入差距。
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01028-4. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.社会传播对乳腺癌医生采用先进影像检查的影响
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw330.
2
Association Between Physician Teamwork and Health System Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后医生团队合作与卫生系统结局之间的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):641-648. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002714. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Time to Surgery and Breast Cancer Survival in the United States.美国的手术时间与乳腺癌生存
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar;2(3):330-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4508.
4
Variation in breast cancer care quality in New York and California based on race/ethnicity and Medicaid enrollment.纽约和加利福尼亚州乳腺癌护理质量因种族/族裔和医疗补助登记情况而异。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):420-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29777. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Timeliness in breast cancer care as an indicator of quality.乳腺癌护理的及时性作为质量指标。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Feb;18(1):82-8. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.82-88.
6
Patient sharing among physicians and costs of care: a network analytic approach to care coordination using claims data.医生间的患者共享与医疗成本:利用索赔数据进行护理协调的网络分析方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2104-7. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
7
Physician social networks and variation in prostate cancer treatment in three cities.医生社交网络与三个城市前列腺癌治疗的差异
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):380-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01331.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
8
Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.年龄、乳腺癌亚型近似和保乳治疗后的局部复发。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 10;29(29):3885-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1105. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
9
Selecting high priority quality measures for breast cancer quality improvement.为改善乳腺癌质量选择高优先级质量指标。
Med Care. 2008 Aug;46(8):762-70. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178ead3.
10
Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by racial/ethnic group.按种族/族裔群体划分的乳腺癌诊断和治疗延误情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2244-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2244.

医生同伴群体特征与乳腺癌手术及时性。

Physician peer group characteristics and timeliness of breast cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):657-665. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4789-8. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-018-4789-8
PMID:29693229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6048589/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Little is known about how the structure of interdisciplinary groups of physicians affects the timeliness of breast cancer surgery their patients receive. We used social network methods to examine variation in surgical delay across physician peer groups and the association of this delay with group characteristics.

METHODS

We used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data to construct physician peer groups based on shared breast cancer patients. We used hierarchical generalized linear models to examine the association of three group characteristics, patient racial composition, provider density (the ratio of potential vs. actual connections between physicians), and provider transitivity (clustering of providers within groups), with delayed surgery.

RESULTS

The study sample included 8338 women with breast cancer in 157 physician peer groups. Surgical delay varied widely across physician peer groups (interquartile range 28.2-50.0%). For every 10% increase in the percentage of black patients in a peer group, there was a 41% increase in the odds of delayed surgery for women in that peer group regardless of a patient's own race [odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.73]. Women in physician peer groups with the highest provider density were less likely to receive delayed surgery than those in physician peer groups with the lowest provider density (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.98). We did not find an association between provider transitivity and delayed surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of surgical delay varied substantially across physician peer groups and was associated with provider density and patient racial composition.

摘要

目的

对于跨学科医师群体的结构如何影响其患者接受乳腺癌手术的及时性,目前知之甚少。我们使用社会网络方法来检查医师同行群体之间手术延迟的差异,以及这种延迟与群体特征的关系。

方法

我们使用链接的监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据,根据共同的乳腺癌患者构建医师同行群体。我们使用分层广义线性模型来检验三种群体特征(患者种族构成、提供者密度(潜在与实际医生之间连接的比例)和提供者传递性(群体内提供者的聚类))与手术延迟的关联。

结果

研究样本包括来自 157 个医师同行群体的 8338 名患有乳腺癌的女性。手术延迟在医师同行群体之间差异很大(四分位间距为 28.2-50.0%)。如果一个同行群体中黑人患者的比例增加 10%,那么该群体中女性接受手术延迟的几率就会增加 41%,而与患者自身种族无关[比值比(OR)1.41,95%置信区间(CI)1.15-1.73]。与提供者密度最低的医师同行群体相比,提供者密度最高的医师同行群体中的女性接受手术延迟的可能性较小(OR 0.65,95%CI 0.44-0.98)。我们没有发现提供者传递性与手术延迟之间的关联。

结论

手术延迟的可能性在医师同行群体之间差异很大,与提供者密度和患者种族构成有关。