• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.患者治疗偏好与成人心理社会心理健康干预中辍学和临床结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):294-302. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750.
2
3
Dropout Rate in Digital Health Interventions for the Prevention of Skin Cancer: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression.数字健康干预措施预防皮肤癌的辍学率:系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e42397. doi: 10.2196/42397.
4
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
5
Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.治疗偏好对随机对照试验的影响:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient. 2019 Dec;12(6):593-609. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00379-6.
6
Dropout From Psychological Interventions for Pathological Health Anxiety: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.病理性健康焦虑心理干预的脱落率:一项随机对照试验的三级元分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Sep-Oct;31(5):e3064. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3064.
7
Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.患者对精神障碍心理治疗与药物治疗的偏好:荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):595-602. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757.
8
9
Psychosocial interventions for preventing and treating depression in dialysis patients.用于预防和治疗透析患者抑郁症的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 2;12(12):CD004542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004542.pub3.
10
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Health Treatment Preferences of Sexual Minority Youth and Young Adults: Findings from Three Samples.性少数青年和年轻人的心理健康治疗偏好:来自三个样本的研究结果。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000850.
2
Nature-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.基于自然的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;16:1625294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625294. eCollection 2025.
3
Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV's Interest in Yoga vs. MBSR as an Adjunct to an App-Based Positive Affect Intervention: A Focus Group Study.感染艾滋病毒的性少数男性对瑜伽与正念减压疗法作为基于应用程序的积极情绪干预辅助手段的兴趣:一项焦点小组研究。
Curr Res Compliment Altern Med. 2025;9(2). doi: 10.29011/2577-2201.100270. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
4
Treatment satisfaction among patients in opioid agonist treatment in Norway: A multicenter cohort study.挪威接受阿片类激动剂治疗患者的治疗满意度:一项多中心队列研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2025 Jul 9:14550725251351711. doi: 10.1177/14550725251351711.
5
Intervention effects and mechanisms of online single session therapy on test anxiety in university students: A randomized controlled trial.在线单次治疗对大学生考试焦虑的干预效果及机制:一项随机对照试验
Internet Interv. 2025 Jun 12;41:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100839. eCollection 2025 Sep.
6
Music therapy for the treatment of anxiety: a systematic review with multilevel meta-analyses.音乐疗法治疗焦虑症:一项多层次荟萃分析的系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 9;84:103293. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103293. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy for emotional disorders in primary care and its mechanisms of change: a randomized step-wedge clinical trial (PsicAP-CV).评估初级保健中情绪障碍的跨诊断认知行为疗法实施效果及其改变机制的方案:一项随机阶梯楔形临床试验(PsicAP-CV)
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 17;20(4):e0320857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320857. eCollection 2025.
8
Group arts interventions for depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对老年人抑郁和焦虑的团体艺术干预:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(3):374-386. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00368-1. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
9
Participant and trial characteristics reported in predictive analyses of trial attrition: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials across multiple conditions.在试验损耗的预测分析中报告的参与者和试验特征:对多种情况下随机对照试验系统评价的伞状综述
Trials. 2025 Mar 12;26(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08794-x.
10
National consensus statement on opioid agonist treatment in custodial settings.关于监禁场所阿片类激动剂治疗的全国共识声明。
Med J Aust. 2025 Mar 17;222(5):262-268. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52603. Epub 2025 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes.共同因素在心理治疗结果中的作用。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:207-231. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
2
Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.为什么精神科患者会参加或不参加社区的治疗小组:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208448. eCollection 2018.
3
Doubly Randomized Preference Trial of Prolonged Exposure Versus Sertraline for Treatment of PTSD.双盲随机对照试验:延长暴露疗法与舍曲林治疗 PTSD 的疗效比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;176(4):287-296. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17090995. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis.容纳来访者偏好对心理治疗的影响:一项元分析。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Nov;74(11):1924-1937. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22680. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research.心理治疗结局研究的荟萃分析中的效应量计算。
Psychother Res. 2018 May;28(3):379-388. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1405171. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Patient satisfaction with mental health services based on Andersen's Behavioral Model.基于安德森行为模型的精神卫生服务患者满意度。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;63(2):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0706743717737030. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Group-based multicomponent treatment to reduce depressive symptoms in women with co-morbid psychiatric and psychosocial problems during pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial.基于群组的多种成分治疗降低妊娠期合并精神和心理社会问题的女性抑郁症状:一项随机对照试验。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Clinical outcomes of psychotherapy dropouts: does dropping out of psychotherapy necessarily mean failure?心理治疗脱落者的临床结局:心理治疗脱落是否一定意味着失败?
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40(2):123–127. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2267. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Effects of Patient Preferences on Outcomes in the Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments (PReDICT) Study.患者偏好对抑郁症缓解预测因素中个体治疗与联合治疗结果的影响(PReDICT研究)
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;174(6):546-556. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050517. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Augmenting SRIs for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Patient Preference for Risperidone Does Not Limit Effectiveness of Exposure and Ritual Prevention.增强5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗强迫症:患者对利培酮的偏好并不限制暴露与仪式行为阻止法的有效性。
Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(5):314-6. doi: 10.1159/000445356. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

患者治疗偏好与成人心理社会心理健康干预中辍学和临床结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):294-302. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750
PMID:31799994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6902231/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Receiving a preferred treatment has previously been associated with lower dropout rates and better clinical outcomes, but this scenario has not been investigated specifically for psychosocial interventions for patients with a mental health diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Nice HDAS (Healthcare Databases Advanced Search), Google Scholar, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), Semantic Scholar, and OpenGrey were searched from inception to July 20, 2018, and updated on June 10, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were eligible if they (1) were a randomized clinical trial; (2) involved participants older than 18 years; (3) involved participants with mental health diagnoses; (4) reported data from a group of participants who received their preferred treatment and a group who received their nonpreferred treatment or who were not given a choice; and (5) offered at least 1 psychosocial intervention.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two researchers extracted study data for attendance, dropout, and clinical outcomes independently. Both assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The following 7 outcomes were examined: attendance, dropout, therapeutic alliance, depression and anxiety outcomes, global outcomes, treatment satisfaction, and remission.

RESULTS

A total of 7341 articles were identified, with 34 eligible for inclusion. Twenty-nine articles were included in the meta-analyses comprising 5294 participants. Receiving a preferred psychosocial mental health treatment had a medium positive association with dropout rates (relative risk, 0.62; 0.48-0.80; P < .001; I2 = 44.6%) and therapeutic alliance (Cohen d = 0.48; 0.15-0.82; P = .01; I2 = 20.4%). There was no evidence of a significant association with other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This is the first review, to our knowledge, examining the association of receiving a preferred psychosocial mental health treatment with both engagement and outcomes for patients with a mental health diagnosis. Patients with mental health diagnoses who received their preferred treatment demonstrated a lower dropout rate from treatment and higher therapeutic alliance scores. These findings underline the need to accommodate patient preference in mental health services to maximize treatment uptake and reduce financial costs of premature dropout and disengagement.

摘要

重要性

先前的研究表明,接受首选治疗与降低脱落率和改善临床结局有关,但针对精神健康诊断患者的心理社会干预措施,尚未对此进行专门研究。

目的

通过系统评价和荟萃分析,评估成人心理社会心理健康干预中患者治疗偏好与脱落和临床结局之间的关联。

数据来源

从建库至 2018 年 7 月 20 日,检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、PubMed、PsychINFO、Scopus、Web of Science、Nice HDAS(卫生保健数据库高级搜索)、Google Scholar、BASE(比勒费尔德学术搜索引擎)、Semantic Scholar 和 OpenGrey。2019 年 6 月 10 日进行了更新。

研究选择

如果研究符合以下条件,则被纳入:(1)为随机临床试验;(2)参与者年龄大于 18 岁;(3)参与者患有精神健康诊断;(4)报告了一组接受首选治疗和一组接受非首选治疗或未给予选择的参与者的数据;(5)提供至少 1 种心理社会干预措施。

数据提取和综合

两名研究人员独立提取了参加情况、脱落率和临床结局的数据。两人均根据 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总数据。

主要结局和测量

共 7 个结局:参加情况、脱落率、治疗联盟、抑郁和焦虑结局、总体结局、治疗满意度和缓解。

结果

共确定了 7341 篇文章,其中 34 篇符合纳入标准。34 篇文章中有 29 篇被纳入荟萃分析,包含 5294 名参与者。接受首选心理社会心理健康治疗与脱落率(相对风险,0.62;0.48-0.80;P < 0.001;I2 = 44.6%)和治疗联盟(Cohen d = 0.48;0.15-0.82;P = 0.01;I2 = 20.4%)呈中度正相关。没有证据表明与其他结局有显著关联。

结论和相关性

据我们所知,这是首次审查,检查了患有精神健康诊断的患者接受首选心理社会心理健康治疗与参与和结局之间的关联。接受首选治疗的精神健康诊断患者的治疗脱落率较低,治疗联盟评分较高。这些发现强调了在精神卫生服务中满足患者偏好的必要性,以最大限度地提高治疗参与度,并降低提前脱落和脱离的财务成本。