• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对精神障碍心理治疗与药物治疗的偏好:荟萃分析综述。

Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.

机构信息

McLean Hospital, Proctor House 3 MS 222, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):595-602. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.12r07757
PMID:23842011
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4156137/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evidence-based practice involves the consideration of efficacy and effectiveness, clinical expertise, and patient preference in treatment selection. However, patient preference for psychiatric treatment has been understudied. The aim of this meta-analytic review was to provide an estimate of the proportion of patients preferring psychological treatment relative to medication for psychiatric disorders.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Collaboration library through August 2011 for studies written in English that assessed adult patient preferences for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The following search terms and subject headings were used in combination: patient preference, consumer preference, therapeutics, psychotherapy, drug therapy, mental disorders, depression, anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance-related disorder, eating disorder, and personality disorder. In addition, the reference sections of identified articles were examined to locate any additional articles not captured by this search.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that assessed preferred type of treatment and included at least 1 psychological treatment and 1 pharmacologic treatment were included. Of the 644 articles identified, 34 met criteria for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Authors extracted relevant data including the proportion of participants reporting preference for psychological or pharmacologic treatment.

RESULTS

The proportion of adult patients preferring psychological treatment was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), which was significantly higher than equivalent preference (ie, higher than 0.50; P < .001). Sensitivity analyses suggested that younger patients (P = .05) and women (P < .01) were significantly more likely to choose psychological treatment. A preference for psychological treatment was consistently evident in both treatment-seeking and unselected (ie, non-treatment-seeking) samples (P < .001 for both) but was somewhat stronger for unselected samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggregation of patient preferences across diverse settings yielded a significant 3-fold preference for psychological treatment. Given evidence for enhanced outcomes among those receiving their preferred psychiatric treatment and the trends for decreasing utilization of psychotherapy, strategies to maximize the linkage of patients to preferred care are needed.

摘要

目的

循证实践涉及在治疗选择中考虑疗效和有效性、临床专业知识以及患者的偏好。然而,对精神科治疗的患者偏好研究较少。本荟萃分析的目的是提供一个估计,即相对于精神障碍的药物治疗,有多少患者更倾向于心理治疗。

数据来源

通过在 2011 年 8 月之前使用 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 合作图书馆的文献检索,评估了评估成年患者对精神障碍治疗的偏好的英文研究。使用了以下搜索词和主题词的组合:患者偏好、消费者偏好、治疗、心理疗法、药物治疗、精神障碍、抑郁、焦虑、失眠、双相情感障碍、精神分裂症、物质相关障碍、饮食障碍和人格障碍。此外,还检查了已确定文章的参考文献部分,以找到未通过此搜索捕获的任何其他文章。

研究选择

评估首选治疗类型并包括至少 1 种心理治疗和 1 种药物治疗的研究包括在内。在确定的 644 篇文章中,有 34 篇符合纳入标准。

数据提取

作者提取了相关数据,包括报告偏好心理或药物治疗的参与者的比例。

结果

选择心理治疗的成年患者比例为 0.75(95%置信区间,0.69-0.80),显著高于等效偏好(即高于 0.50;P<.001)。敏感性分析表明,年轻患者(P=.05)和女性(P<.01)更有可能选择心理治疗。在治疗寻求和非选择(即非治疗寻求)样本中,心理治疗的偏好始终是明显的(两者均为 P<.001),但在非选择样本中稍强一些。

结论

在不同环境中对患者偏好的综合分析得出了对心理治疗的显著 3 倍偏好。鉴于那些接受他们首选的精神科治疗的患者的结果有所改善,以及心理治疗的利用率呈下降趋势,需要采取策略最大程度地将患者与首选治疗相联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff1/4156137/766cc9d10714/nihms-623724-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff1/4156137/49eedfe64edb/nihms-623724-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff1/4156137/766cc9d10714/nihms-623724-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff1/4156137/49eedfe64edb/nihms-623724-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff1/4156137/766cc9d10714/nihms-623724-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.患者对精神障碍心理治疗与药物治疗的偏好:荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):595-602. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
4
Psychological interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders.针对并发抑郁症和物质使用障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009501.pub2.
5
Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.干预成年人创伤后复杂经历:INCiTE 混合方法系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(43):1-312. doi: 10.3310/hta24430.
6
Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.患者治疗偏好与成人心理社会心理健康干预中辍学和临床结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):294-302. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750.
7
Alexithymia and treatment preferences among psychiatric outpatients.精神科门诊患者的述情障碍与治疗偏好
Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(6):383-4. doi: 10.1159/000235981. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
8
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
9
Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults.成人躯体形式障碍和医学无法解释的身体症状(MUPS)的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 1;2014(11):CD011142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011142.pub2.
10
Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.常规使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs)以改善成人常见精神障碍的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD011119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a resistance exercise training to treat major depression via cerebrovascular mechanisms (RESIST Trial).一项通过脑血管机制进行抗阻运动训练治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照试验方案(RESIST试验)
Trials. 2025 Aug 26;26(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09025-z.
2
How many specialists and residents in Clinical Psychology are required in the Spanish National Health System? A needs-based study.西班牙国家卫生系统需要多少临床心理学专家和住院医生?一项基于需求的研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Aug 26;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12960-025-01017-z.
3
Benefits and barriers associated with using cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined Pharmacotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Medication Effects, Glucocorticoids, and Attenuated Treatment Outcomes.焦虑症的联合药物治疗与认知行为疗法:药物疗效、糖皮质激素与减弱的治疗效果
Clin Psychol (New York). 2010 Jun 1;17(2):91-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01198.x. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
2
Rebooting Psychotherapy Research and Practice to Reduce the Burden of Mental Illness.重启心理治疗研究与实践,以减轻精神疾病负担。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):21-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393527. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
Interventions for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的益处与障碍:一项叙述性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 28;16:1593384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1593384. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of anxiolytic drugs for the treatment of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗焦虑药物治疗焦虑症的比较疗效和可接受性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02082-0.
5
The VIP trial: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of a Victim Improvement Package (VIP) for the reduction of continued symptoms of depression or anxiety in older victims of community crime in an English city.VIP试验:一项随机对照试验,旨在研究受害者改善方案(VIP)对减轻英国某城市社区犯罪老年受害者持续的抑郁或焦虑症状的临床效果。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e095184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095184.
6
"I've learned that I'm open-minded to this possibility": A qualitative study to evaluate the acceptability of a psilocybin-aided smoking cessation treatment for people with HIV who smoke.“我了解到自己对这种可能性持开放态度”:一项定性研究,旨在评估裸盖菇素辅助戒烟治疗对吸烟的艾滋病毒感染者的可接受性。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00563-0.
7
Preferences for group psychological interventions on perinatal depression in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国围产期抑郁症群体心理干预的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 1;83(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01643-y.
8
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus treatment as usual after non-remission with NHS Talking Therapies high-intensity psychological therapy for depression: a UK-based clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised, controlled, superiority trial.基于正念的认知疗法与英国国民健康服务谈话疗法高强度心理治疗抑郁症未缓解后常规治疗的比较:一项基于英国的临床疗效和成本效益随机对照优势试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;12(6):433-446. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00105-1.
9
Protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy for emotional disorders in primary care and its mechanisms of change: a randomized step-wedge clinical trial (PsicAP-CV).评估初级保健中情绪障碍的跨诊断认知行为疗法实施效果及其改变机制的方案:一项随机阶梯楔形临床试验(PsicAP-CV)
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 17;20(4):e0320857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320857. eCollection 2025.
10
Effectiveness of General Practitioner Referral Versus Self-Referral Pathways to Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, Panic Disorder, and Social Anxiety Disorder: Naturalistic Study.全科医生转诊与自我转诊途径对抑郁症、惊恐障碍和社交焦虑障碍的互联网引导认知行为疗法的有效性:自然主义研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 25;12:e68165. doi: 10.2196/68165.
老年人广泛性焦虑障碍的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
4
Economic impact of nonpersistence with antidepressant treatment in the adult population of Quebec: a comparative cost-effectiveness approach.魁北克成年人群体中不坚持抗抑郁药物治疗的经济影响:一种比较成本效益的方法。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.015. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
5
Relative effects of CBT and pharmacotherapy in depression versus anxiety: is medication somewhat better for depression, and CBT somewhat better for anxiety?认知行为疗法与药物治疗在抑郁症与焦虑症中的相对疗效:药物治疗对抑郁症是否稍好一些,而认知行为疗法对焦虑症是否稍好一些?
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jul;28(7):560-7. doi: 10.1002/da.20829. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
Psychotherapy versus second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis.心理治疗与第二代抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Mar;199(3):142-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820caefb.
7
Depression treatment preferences of Hispanic individuals: exploring the influence of ethnicity, language, and explanatory models.西班牙裔个体的抑郁治疗偏好:探索种族、语言和解释模型的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;24(1):39-50. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100118.
8
Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.精神健康治疗障碍:来自全国共病调查再测的结果。
Psychol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):1751-61. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002291. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
9
Preferences.偏好。
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;67(2):155-65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20759.
10
Patient preferences for obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment.患者对强迫症治疗的偏好。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1434-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05537blu.