Section of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Metabolic Unit, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padova, Italy.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr;22(4):648-657. doi: 10.1111/dom.13940. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
To investigate the effect of sitagliptin (SITA) and metformin (MET) monotherapy as well as in combination (MET+SITA) on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in women with recent gestational diabetes (GDM) and impaired glucose regulation (IGR: impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance).
Forty women were randomly assigned to receive SITA (100 mg qd), MET (850 mg bid) or MET+SITA (50 + 850 mg bid) for 16 weeks. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and +125 mg/dL hyperglycaemic clamp followed by 5 g i.v. L-arginine were performed at baseline and end of study. The primary outcome of the study was the mean change in arginine-stimulated insulin secretion rate during the hyperglycaemic clamp test from baseline to 16-week therapy.
At week 16, body mass index declined in all groups (-1.2 ± 0.2 kg/m ; P < 0.05). MET+SITA gave a greater increase of first phase insulin secretion and arginine-stimulated response (720.3 ± 299.0 to 995.5 ± 370.3 pmol/L and 3.2 ± 0.6 to 4.8 ± 1.0 pmoL/min, respectively, both P < 0.05) compared with MET and SITA. Similarly, MET+SITA was more effective in increasing OGTT-based glucose sensitivity (55.7 ± 11.3 to 108 ± 56.2 pmol x min m x mM ; P = 0.04) and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (M/I: 2.2 ± 0.5 to 4.6 ± 1.3 mg/kg/min÷μIU/min/ml; P = 0.04; Matsuda index [SI]: 3.1 ± 0.4 to 5.7 ± 1.1; P = 0.03) compared with either MET or SITA. Disposition index (ISSI-2) increased with MET+SITA and SITA (both P < 0.05), while no significant change was observed in MET. Among MET+SITA women, 33% reverted to normal glucose tolerance (NGT) compared with 14% with MET and 7% with SITA (P < 0.05).
This study shows that MET+SITA is superior to SITA and MET monotherapy regarding beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity improvement in IGR women with previous GDM, and may offer a potential pharmacologic intervention to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in this high-risk population.
研究西他列汀(SITA)和二甲双胍(MET)单药治疗以及联合治疗(MET+SITA)对近期患有妊娠糖尿病(GDM)和糖调节受损(IGR:空腹血糖受损和/或糖耐量受损)的女性β细胞功能和胰岛素敏感性的影响。
40 名女性被随机分配接受 SITA(100mg qd)、MET(850mg bid)或 MET+SITA(50+850mg bid)治疗 16 周。在基线和研究结束时进行 75g 口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和+125mg/dL 高血糖钳夹试验,然后静脉内给予 5g L-精氨酸。该研究的主要结局是高血糖钳夹试验中精氨酸刺激胰岛素分泌率在基线至 16 周治疗期间的平均变化。
第 16 周时,所有组的体重指数均下降(-1.2±0.2kg/m;P<0.05)。与 MET 和 SITA 相比,MET+SITA 使第一相胰岛素分泌和精氨酸刺激反应增加更多(720.3±299.0 至 995.5±370.3pmol/L 和 3.2±0.6 至 4.8±1.0pmoL/min,均 P<0.05)。同样,MET+SITA 更有效地提高 OGTT 为基础的葡萄糖敏感性(55.7±11.3 至 108±56.2pmol x min m x mM;P=0.04)和胰岛素刺激的葡萄糖摄取(M/I:2.2±0.5 至 4.6±1.3mg/kg/min÷μIU/min/ml;P=0.04;Matsuda 指数[SI]:3.1±0.4 至 5.7±1.1;P=0.03),与 MET 或 SITA 相比。与 MET 相比,MET+SITA 和 SITA 均可增加胰岛素分泌指数(ISSI-2)(均 P<0.05),而 MET 则无明显变化。在 MET+SITA 女性中,与 MET(14%)和 SITA(7%)相比,有 33%的人恢复为正常糖耐量(NGT)(P<0.05)。
这项研究表明,与 SITA 和 MET 单药治疗相比,MET+SITA 可改善近期患有 GDM 的 IGR 女性的β细胞功能和胰岛素敏感性,并且可能为降低该高危人群发生 2 型糖尿病的风险提供一种潜在的药物干预措施。