J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000613.
Guidelines endorse educating patients to self-manage atrial fibrillation (AF) to mitigate AF-related adverse events contributing to personal and societal burden. Published interventions to improve patients' knowledge about AF and self-management are emerging, but evaluations of interventions are limited by lack of a psychometrically sound instrument to measure learning outcomes.
We report results of initial psychometric testing of the Knowledge about Atrial Fibrillation and Self-Management (KAFSM) survey.
Participants (N = 383), from midwest and southeast medical centers, completed the KAFSM survey. Content validity was evaluated by expert review. Construct validity was evaluated using the Pearson correlation procedure for convergent validity with the Knowledge about Atrial Fibrillation test and independent t test for known groups. Factor analysis using principal axis factoring was performed with a tetrachoric matrix. The Kuder-Richardson procedure was used to determine internal consistency reliability.
A content validity index of 0.86 resulted from expert review. A positive (r = 0.60) correlation between the KAFSM survey and Knowledge about Atrial Fibrillation test demonstrated convergent validity. Higher KAFSM scores (difference, 3.28; t = 6.44, P < .001) observed in participants who underwent AF ablation compared with those with an AF diagnosis of less than or equal to 6 months supported known groups validity. Factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure explaining 35% of the variance. The Kuder-Richardson coefficient was 0.86.
The KAFSM survey demonstrates content and construct validity and internal consistency reliability. Implementation of the KAFSM in the clinical setting will permit evaluation of the feasibility of its use and value to assess learning outcomes of AF education.
指南支持教育患者自我管理心房颤动 (AF),以减轻与 AF 相关的不良事件,减轻个人和社会负担。已经出现了改善患者对 AF 和自我管理知识的干预措施,但由于缺乏测量学习成果的心理测量学上合理的工具,对干预措施的评估受到限制。
我们报告了初始心理测量学测试结果知识关于心房颤动和自我管理(KAFSM)调查。
参与者(N = 383)来自中西部和东南部的医疗中心,完成了 KAFSM 调查。内容效度通过专家审查进行评估。通过与心房颤动知识测试的 Pearson 相关程序评估结构效度,通过独立 t 检验评估已知组的收敛效度。使用主成分因子分析进行因素分析,使用四分相关矩阵。使用 Kuder-Richardson 程序确定内部一致性可靠性。
专家审查产生的内容效度指数为 0.86。KAFSM 调查与心房颤动知识测试之间的正相关(r = 0.60)表明具有收敛效度。与 AF 消融相比,在 AF 诊断时间小于或等于 6 个月的患者中观察到更高的 KAFSM 评分(差异为 3.28;t = 6.44,P <.001),支持已知组的有效性。因子分析揭示了一个单一因素结构,解释了 35%的方差。Kuder-Richardson 系数为 0.86。
KAFSM 调查具有内容和结构有效性以及内部一致性可靠性。在临床环境中实施 KAFSM 将允许评估其使用的可行性及其评估 AF 教育学习成果的价值。