Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):85-95. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0382.
This study compared the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of insulin aspart biosimilar/follow-on biologic product SAR341402 (SAR-Asp) with originator insulin aspart-NovoLog/NovoRapid (NN-Asp) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with multiple daily injections in combination with insulin glargine (Lantus; Gla-100). This 6-month, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study (NCT03211858) enrolled 597 people with T1D ( = 497) or T2D ( = 100). Participants were randomized 1:1 to mealtime SAR-Asp ( = 301) or NN-Asp ( = 296) in combination with Gla-100. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (by 0.3% margin in the intent-to-treat population) of SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp in HbA1c change from baseline to week 26. Immunogenicity was also assessed in terms of anti-insulin aspart antibody (AIA) status (positive/negative) and titers during the study. HbA1c was similarly improved in both treatment groups (SAR-Asp -0.38%; NN-Asp -0.30%); the least squares mean difference at week 26 for SAR-Asp minus NN-Asp was -0.08% (95% confidence interval: -0.192 to 0.039), thus meeting the criteria for noninferiority between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp and inverse noninferiority of NN-Asp versus SAR-Asp. Changes in fasting plasma glucose and seven-point self-monitored plasma glucose profile, including postprandial glucose excursions, and insulin dosages were similar in both groups at week 26. Safety and tolerability, including AIA responses (incidence, prevalence), hypoglycemia, and adverse events (including hypersensitivity events and injection site reactions), were similar between groups. SAR-Asp demonstrated effective glycemic control with a similar safety and immunogenicity profile to NN-Asp in people with diabetes treated for 26 weeks.
这项研究比较了在接受甘精胰岛素(Lantus;Gla-100)联合多次每日注射治疗的 1 型糖尿病(T1D)或 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,胰岛素类似物/后续生物制剂 SAR341402(SAR-Asp)与原研胰岛素 Aspart-NovoLog/NovoRapid(NN-Asp)的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。这是一项为期 6 个月、随机、开放标签、3 期研究(NCT03211858),共纳入 597 例 T1D( = 497)或 T2D( = 100)患者。患者按 1:1 随机分组,接受餐时 SAR-Asp( = 301)或 NN-Asp( = 296)联合 Gla-100 治疗。主要目的是在意向治疗人群中,通过 0.3%的边界来证明 SAR-Asp 与 NN-Asp 在从基线到 26 周时的 HbA1c 变化方面无差异。免疫原性也通过胰岛素 Aspart 抗体(AIA)状态(阳性/阴性)和研究期间的滴度来评估。两组治疗均显著改善 HbA1c(SAR-Asp -0.38%;NN-Asp -0.30%);26 周时 SAR-Asp 与 NN-Asp 的最小二乘均数差值为 -0.08%(95%置信区间:-0.192 至 0.039),因此符合 SAR-Asp 与 NN-Asp 之间非劣效性标准,以及 NN-Asp 相对于 SAR-Asp 的逆非劣效性。两组患者在第 26 周时的空腹血糖和七点自我监测血糖谱变化(包括餐后血糖波动)和胰岛素剂量均相似。安全性和耐受性,包括 AIA 反应(发生率、流行率)、低血糖和不良事件(包括过敏反应和注射部位反应),在两组间也相似。在接受 26 周治疗的糖尿病患者中,SAR-Asp 显示出有效的血糖控制,其安全性和免疫原性与 NN-Asp 相似。