Hermansen Kjeld, Bohl Mette, Schioldan Anne Grethe
Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Drugs. 2016 Jan;76(1):41-74. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0500-0.
Limiting excessive postprandial glucose excursions is an important component of good overall glycemic control in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that insulin aspart, which is structurally identical to regular human insulin except for the replacement of a single proline amino acid with an aspartic acid residue, has a more physiologic time-action profile (i.e., reaches a higher peak and reaches that peak sooner) than regular human insulin. As expected with this improved pharmacokinetic profile, insulin aspart demonstrates a greater glucose-lowering effect compared with regular human insulin. Numerous randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have also demonstrated improved postprandial control with insulin aspart compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, as well as efficacy and safety in children, pregnant patients, hospitalized patients, and patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Studies have demonstrated that step-wise addition of insulin aspart is a viable intensification option for patients with type 2 diabetes failing on basal insulin. Insulin aspart has shown a good safety profile, with no evidence of increased receptor binding, mitogenicity, stimulation of anti-insulin antibodies, or hypoglycemia compared with regular human insulin. In one meta-analysis, there was evidence of a lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with regular human insulin and, in a trial that specifically included patients with a history of recurrent hypoglycemia, a significantly lower rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes. The next generation of insulin aspart (faster-acting insulin aspart) is being developed with a view to further improving on these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties.
限制餐后血糖过度波动是糖尿病患者良好总体血糖控制的重要组成部分。药代动力学研究表明,门冬胰岛素除了将一个脯氨酸氨基酸替换为天冬氨酸残基外,其结构与常规人胰岛素相同,与常规人胰岛素相比,具有更符合生理的时间 - 作用曲线(即达到更高峰值且更快达到该峰值)。正如这种改善的药代动力学特征所预期的那样,与常规人胰岛素相比,门冬胰岛素显示出更大的降糖效果。多项随机对照试验和一项荟萃分析还表明,与常规人胰岛素相比,1型或2型糖尿病患者使用门冬胰岛素后餐后血糖控制得到改善,并且在儿童、孕妇、住院患者以及使用持续皮下胰岛素输注的患者中也具有疗效和安全性。研究表明,对于基础胰岛素治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者,逐步添加门冬胰岛素是一种可行的强化治疗选择。与常规人胰岛素相比,门冬胰岛素显示出良好的安全性,没有证据表明其受体结合增加、有丝分裂原性、刺激抗胰岛素抗体或低血糖。在一项荟萃分析中,有证据表明与常规人胰岛素相比,夜间低血糖发生率较低,并且在一项专门纳入有反复低血糖病史患者的试验中,严重低血糖事件发生率显著降低。正在研发下一代门冬胰岛素(速效门冬胰岛素),以期进一步改善这些药代动力学/药效学特性。