• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Switching SAR341402 Insulin Aspart and Originator Insulin Aspart vs Continuous Use of Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The GEMELLI X Trial.1型糖尿病成人患者中,将赛诺菲SAR341402门冬胰岛素转换为原研门冬胰岛素与持续使用原研门冬胰岛素的安全性和有效性比较:GEMELLI X试验
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 29:19322968241232709. doi: 10.1177/19322968241232709.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Treated for 26 Weeks with Multiple Daily Injections in Combination with Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI 1).在接受甘精胰岛素联合多次皮下注射治疗 26 周的糖尿病患者中,比较人胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研药门冬胰岛素的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签试验(GEMELLI 1)。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):85-95. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0382.
3
Safety, Immunogenicity, and Glycemic Control of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Also Using Insulin Glargine: 12-Month Results from the GEMELLI 1 Trial.在同时使用甘精胰岛素的糖尿病患者中,比较胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研药门冬胰岛素的安全性、免疫原性和血糖控制:GEMELLI 1 试验 12 个月结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jul;22(7):516-526. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0008. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Pharmacokinetic similarity of switching SAR341402 insulin aspart biosimilar and NovoLog insulin aspart versus continuous use of NovoLog in adults with type 1 diabetes: The GEMELLI X trial.1型糖尿病成人患者中,将SAR341402门冬胰岛素生物类似药转换为诺和锐®门冬胰岛素与持续使用诺和锐®门冬胰岛素的药代动力学相似性:GEMELLI X试验
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Feb;26(2):540-547. doi: 10.1111/dom.15341. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
5
Safety and Tolerability of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart (NovoLog) When Used in Insulin Pumps in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.在 1 型糖尿病成人患者中,使用胰岛素泵时门冬胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研门冬胰岛素(诺和锐)的安全性和耐受性:一项随机、开放标签临床试验。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Sep;22(9):666-673. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0446. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults with Diabetes (GEMELLI 1): A Subgroup Analysis by Prior Type of Mealtime Insulin.与原研门冬胰岛素相比,门冬胰岛素生物类似药SAR341402在成人糖尿病患者中的疗效、安全性及免疫原性(GEMELLI 1):基于既往餐时胰岛素类型的亚组分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Feb;12(2):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00992-x. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal and prandial insulin (QWINT-4): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial.每周一次的胰岛素efsitora alfa与每日一次的甘精胰岛素U100用于接受基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病成人患者的比较(QWINT-4):一项3期随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2025 Jun 28;405(10497):2290-2301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01069-4. Epub 2025 Jun 22.
8
Glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients.用于治疗肾移植受者中已存在的和新发糖尿病的降糖药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD009966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009966.pub2.
9
Once-weekly IcoSema versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 3): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3a trial.每周一次IcoSema与多次每日胰岛素注射用于2型糖尿病管理的比较(COMBINE 3):一项开放标签、多中心、达标治疗、非劣效性、随机、3a期试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 Jul;13(7):556-567. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00052-X. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
10
What do the guidelines say about use of biosimilar insulin therapy? Simple practical considerations to guide clinicians in different patient subgroups-Sharing Canadian perspectives.关于生物类似物胰岛素疗法的使用,指南是怎么说的?指导不同患者亚组临床医生的简单实用考量——分享加拿大的观点。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1111/dom.16278.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacokinetic similarity of switching SAR341402 insulin aspart biosimilar and NovoLog insulin aspart versus continuous use of NovoLog in adults with type 1 diabetes: The GEMELLI X trial.1型糖尿病成人患者中,将SAR341402门冬胰岛素生物类似药转换为诺和锐®门冬胰岛素与持续使用诺和锐®门冬胰岛素的药代动力学相似性:GEMELLI X试验
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Feb;26(2):540-547. doi: 10.1111/dom.15341. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Falling Insulin Prices - What Just Happened?胰岛素价格下跌——究竟发生了什么?
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1636-1639. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2303279. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
In Brief: Rezvoglar - another insulin glargine product interchangeable with Lantus.简而言之:Rezvoglar——另一种可与来得时互换的甘精胰岛素产品。
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2023 Apr 3;65(1673):56. doi: 10.58347/tml.2023.1673c.
4
Leveraging Clinical Pharmacology Data to Assess Biosimilarity and Interchangeability of Insulin Products.利用临床药理学数据评估胰岛素产品的生物相似性和可互换性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;113(4):794-802. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2731. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
The First Interchangeable Biosimilar Insulin: Insulin Glargine-yfgn.首款可互换的生物类似胰岛素:甘精胰岛素-yfgn。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):490-494. doi: 10.1177/19322968211067511. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
6
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between SAR341402 insulin aspart and Japan-approved NovoRapid in healthy Japanese subjects.在健康的日本受试者中,SAR341402 门冬胰岛素与日本批准的诺和锐的药代动力学和药效学相似性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 25;11(1):22931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02410-z.
7
The impact of biosimilar insulins on the diabetes landscape.生物类似胰岛素对糖尿病领域的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):91-98. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21253. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars: a systematic review.医生对生物类似药采用情况的看法:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e034183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034183.
9
Safety, Immunogenicity, and Glycemic Control of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Also Using Insulin Glargine: 12-Month Results from the GEMELLI 1 Trial.在同时使用甘精胰岛素的糖尿病患者中,比较胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研药门冬胰岛素的安全性、免疫原性和血糖控制:GEMELLI 1 试验 12 个月结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jul;22(7):516-526. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0008. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
Safety and Tolerability of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart (NovoLog) When Used in Insulin Pumps in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.在 1 型糖尿病成人患者中,使用胰岛素泵时门冬胰岛素类似物 SAR341402 与原研门冬胰岛素(诺和锐)的安全性和耐受性:一项随机、开放标签临床试验。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Sep;22(9):666-673. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0446. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

1型糖尿病成人患者中,将赛诺菲SAR341402门冬胰岛素转换为原研门冬胰岛素与持续使用原研门冬胰岛素的安全性和有效性比较:GEMELLI X试验

Safety and Efficacy of Switching SAR341402 Insulin Aspart and Originator Insulin Aspart vs Continuous Use of Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The GEMELLI X Trial.

作者信息

Shah Viral N, Al-Karadsheh Amer, Barnes Cathy, Mandry Jose, Nakhle Samer, Wernicke-Panten Karin, Kramer Daniel, Schmider Wolfgang, Pierre Suzanne, Teichert Lenore, Rotthaeuser Baerbel, Mukherjee Bhaswati, Bailey Timothy S

机构信息

Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism and Center for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 29:19322968241232709. doi: 10.1177/19322968241232709.

DOI:10.1177/19322968241232709
PMID:38420944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SAR341402 insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) is a rapid-acting insulin analog developed as an interchangeable biosimilar to the marketed insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp). GEMELLI X was a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes with a biosimilar in line with the US Food and Drug Administration requirements for designation as an interchangeable biosimilar. This report assessed whether multiple switches between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp lead to equivalent safety and efficacy compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily injections, using once-daily insulin glargine U100 (Lantus) as the basal insulin.

METHODS

This open-label randomized (1:1), parallel-group, phase 3 trial compared four × four weeks of alternating use of individually titrated SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for first four weeks, SAR-Asp in last four weeks; switching group) vs 16 weeks of continuous use of NN-Asp (nonswitching group). End points included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, adverse events, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and change in efficacy parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 210 patients randomized, 200 (95.5%) completed the trial. Patients assigned to switching group (n = 104) and nonswitching group (n = 106) showed similar safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin aspart antibody responses, adverse events, and hypoglycemia. At week 16, there was no relevant difference between switching vs nonswitching groups in the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (least square [LS] mean difference = 0.05% [95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.13, 0.22]; 0.50 mmol/mol [-1.40, 2.39]), fasting plasma glucose (LS mean difference = 0.23 mmol/L [95% CI = -1.08, 1.53]; 4.12 mg/dL [-19.38, 27.62]), and changes in insulin dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternating doses of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp compared with continuous use of NN-Asp showed similar safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy in adults with T1D. This study supports interchangeability between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp in T1D management.

摘要

背景

SAR341402门冬胰岛素(SAR-Asp)是一种速效胰岛素类似物,作为可互换生物类似药开发,与已上市的门冬胰岛素参比产品(诺和锐;NN-Asp)相似。GEMELLI X是一项随机对照试验,旨在根据美国食品药品监督管理局对可互换生物类似药认定的要求,评估一种生物类似药的疗效。本报告评估了在使用每日一次甘精胰岛素U100(来得时)作为基础胰岛素进行多次皮下注射治疗的1型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者中,与持续使用NN-Asp相比,SAR-Asp和NN-Asp之间多次转换是否会导致等效的安全性和疗效。

方法

这项开放标签、随机(1:1)、平行组3期试验比较了四周内分别滴定的SAR-Asp和NN-Asp交替使用(前四周使用NN-Asp,后四周使用SAR-Asp;转换组)与连续使用NN-Asp 16周(非转换组)的情况。终点包括药代动力学、免疫原性、不良事件、低血糖、胰岛素剂量以及疗效参数的变化。

结果

随机分组的210例患者中,200例(95.5%)完成了试验。分配至转换组(n = 104)和非转换组(n = 106)的患者显示出相似的安全性和耐受性,包括抗门冬胰岛素抗体反应、不良事件和低血糖。在第16周时,转换组与非转换组之间糖化血红蛋白自基线的变化(最小二乘[LS]均值差异 = 0.05% [95%置信区间[CI] = -0.13, 0.22];0.50 mmol/mol [-1.40, 2.39])、空腹血糖(LS均值差异 = 0.23 mmol/L [95% CI = -1.08, 1.53];4.12 mg/dL [-19.38, 27.62])以及胰岛素剂量变化均无显著差异。

结论

与持续使用NN-Asp相比,交替使用SAR-Asp和NN-Asp在T1D成人患者中显示出相似的安全性、免疫原性和临床疗效。本研究支持在T1D管理中SAR-Asp和NN-Asp的可互换性。