• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士非心脏移植大学医院终末期心力衰竭患者新实施的机械循环支持计划的 5 年结果。

5-year results of a newly implemented mechanical circulatory support program for terminal heart failure patients in a Swiss non-cardiac transplant university hospital.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 31;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01447-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-021-01447-5
PMID:33789723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8011141/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Switzerland, long-term circulatory support programs have been limited to heart transplant centers. In 2014, to improve the management of patients with end-stage heart failure not eligible for transplantation, we implemented a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) program for destination therapy at the University Hospital of Basel.

METHODS

We described the program set-up with practical aspects. Patients aged 65 and above with therapy refractory end-stage heart failure without major contraindication for LVAD implantation were included. Younger patients with bridge-to-candidacy profile were also considered. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimate, we retrospectively analyzed the overall survival and freedom from major adverse events after LVAD implantation. We compared our results to internationally reported data.

RESULTS

Between October 2014 and September 2019, 16 patients received an LVAD in our center. The mean age at implantation was 67.1 years. The mean EuroSCORE II was 24.4% and the median INTERMACS level was 4. Thirteen patients received an LVAD as destination therapy and three patients as bridge-to-candidacy. The overall survival was 87.5 and 70% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from stroke was 81.3% at 1 and 2 years. Freedom from device infection was 67.7 and 58.7% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from gastrointestinal bleeding was 75 and 56.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from readmission was 50 and 31.3% and at 6 months and 1 year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Basel experience demonstrated the possible implementation of an LVAD program for destination therapy or bridge-to-candidacy in a non-transplant comprehensive heart-failure center with midterm survival results and freedom from major adverse events comparable to international registries. Patient selection remains crucial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database ( NCT04263012 ).

摘要

背景

在瑞士,长期循环支持项目仅限于心脏移植中心。为了改善不符合心脏移植条件的终末期心力衰竭患者的管理,我们于 2014 年在巴塞尔大学医院实施了左心室辅助装置(LVAD)作为终末期心力衰竭的治疗方案。

方法

我们描述了方案的实际设置。纳入年龄 65 岁及以上、因治疗无效且无 LVAD 植入重大禁忌证的终末期心力衰竭患者,也考虑年轻桥接候选患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计,我们回顾性分析了 LVAD 植入后的总体生存率和无重大不良事件发生率。我们将我们的结果与国际报告的数据进行了比较。

结果

2014 年 10 月至 2019 年 9 月,我院中心共 16 例患者接受了 LVAD 治疗。植入时的平均年龄为 67.1 岁。平均 EuroSCORE II 为 24.4%,中位数 INTERMACS 分级为 4 级。13 例患者接受 LVAD 作为终末期心力衰竭的治疗方案,3 例患者接受桥接候选方案。1 年和 2 年的总体生存率分别为 87.5%和 70%。1 年和 2 年的免于中风发生率分别为 81.3%和 70%。1 年和 2 年的免于设备感染发生率分别为 67.7%和 58.7%。1 年和 2 年的免于胃肠道出血发生率分别为 75%和 56.3%。6 个月和 1 年的免于再入院率分别为 50%和 31.3%。

结论

巴塞尔经验表明,在非移植综合心力衰竭中心,通过患者选择,可实施 LVAD 终末期心力衰竭治疗方案或桥接候选方案,中期生存结果和无重大不良事件发生率与国际登记处相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/c52389672230/13019_2021_1447_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/83492348a0fd/13019_2021_1447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/aa82b5a9e675/13019_2021_1447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/0aa4a6ae412b/13019_2021_1447_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/c52389672230/13019_2021_1447_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/83492348a0fd/13019_2021_1447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/aa82b5a9e675/13019_2021_1447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/0aa4a6ae412b/13019_2021_1447_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0680/8011141/c52389672230/13019_2021_1447_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
5-year results of a newly implemented mechanical circulatory support program for terminal heart failure patients in a Swiss non-cardiac transplant university hospital.瑞士非心脏移植大学医院终末期心力衰竭患者新实施的机械循环支持计划的 5 年结果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 31;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01447-5.
2
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
3
Association of Clinical Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device Use by Bridge to Transplant or Destination Therapy Intent: The Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Randomized Clinical Trial.临床结局与通过桥接移植或目的地治疗意向使用左心室辅助装置的关联:使用 HeartMate 3(MOMENTUM 3)机械循环支持治疗的多中心磁悬浮技术研究(MOMENTUM 3)随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):411-419. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323.
4
Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后心脏移植的长期预后。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy214.
5
Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.左心室辅助装置(HeartMate II)的应用:新加坡的经验
Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12247. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.
7
Midterm outcome of implantable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: Single-center experience in Japan.作为移植桥梁的植入式左心室辅助装置的中期结果:日本单中心经验
J Cardiol. 2015 May;65(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Long-term follow-up of patients supported with the HeartWare left ventricular assist system.HeartWare 左心室辅助系统支持患者的长期随访。
Artif Organs. 2020 Oct;44(10):1061-1066. doi: 10.1111/aor.13686. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Fully Magnetically Levitated vs Axial-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices in the MOMENTUM 3 Randomized Trial.在 MOMENTUM 3 随机试验中,完全磁悬浮与轴流左心室辅助装置患者的 5 年结果。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16197.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of an Interdisciplinary Left-Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Outpatient Clinic in Long-Term Survival After Hospital Discharge: A Decade of HeartMate III Experience in a Non-Transplant Center.跨学科左心室辅助装置(LVAD)门诊在出院后长期生存中的作用:非移植中心十年的HeartMate III经验
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 22;13(8):1795. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081795.
2
Cardiac Surgery in Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭的心脏手术
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 31;11(3):773. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030773.

本文引用的文献

1
In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.全面解析:现代左心室辅助装置感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Short-term single-centre experience with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure.使用HeartMate 3左心室辅助装置治疗晚期心力衰竭的短期单中心经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 1;58(3):511-518. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa075.
3
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.
胸外科医生协会 Intermacs 2019 年度报告:设备和适应证的变化格局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005.
4
Stroke risk following implantation of current generation centrifugal flow left ventricular assist devices.当代离心式左心室辅助装置植入后的中风风险
J Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):383-389. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14397. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: State of the Field.持续血流左心室辅助装置支持期间的胃肠道出血:该领域现状
Cardiol Rev. 2019 Jan/Feb;27(1):8-13. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000212.
6
Left ventricular assist device therapy: the Kuwait experience.左心室辅助装置治疗:科威特的经验。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1758-S1762. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.54.
7
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) program in Chile: first successful experience in South America.智利的左心室辅助装置(LVAD)项目:南美洲的首次成功经验。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1751-S1757. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.83.
8
Successful establishment of a left ventricular assist device program in an emerging country: one year experience.在一个新兴国家成功建立左心室辅助装置项目:一年经验
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1743-S1750. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.147.
9
Two-Year Outcomes with a Magnetically Levitated Cardiac Pump in Heart Failure.磁悬浮离心泵治疗心力衰竭的两年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1386-1395. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800866. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
10
The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): second report.欧洲心胸外科协会机械循环支持患者注册研究(EUROMACS):第二份报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;53(2):309-316. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx320.