Tchoukina Inna, Shah Keyur B, Thibodeau Jennifer T, Estep Jerry D, Lala Anuradha, Lanfear David E, Gilotra Nisha A, Pamboukian Salpy V, Horstmanshof Douglas A, Mcnamara Dennis M, Haas Donald C, Jorde Ulrich P, Mclean Rhondalyn C, Cascino Thomas M, Khalatbari Shokoufeh, Richards Blair, Yosef Matheos, Spino Cathie, Baldwin J Timothy, Mann Douglas L, Aaronson Keith D, Stewart Garrick C
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
J Card Fail. 2020 Apr;26(4):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.11.026. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
Worsening heart failure (HF) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have been shown to impact the decision to proceed with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but little is known about how socioeconomic factors influence expressed patient preference for LVAD.
Ambulatory patients with advanced systolic HF (n=353) reviewed written information about LVAD therapy and completed a brief survey to indicate whether they would want an LVAD to treat their current level of HF. Ordinal logistic regression analyses identified clinical and demographic predictors of LVAD preference. Higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, worse HRQOL measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, lower education level, and lower income were significant univariable predictors of patients wanting an LVAD. In the multivariable model, higher NYHA class (OR [odds ratio]: 1.43, CI [confidence interval]: 1.08-1.90, P = .013) and lower income level (OR: 2.10, CI: 1.18 - 3.76, P = .012 for <$40,000 vs >$80,000) remained significantly associated with wanting an LVAD.
Among ambulatory patients with advanced systolic HF, treatment preference for LVAD was influenced by level of income independent of HF severity. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic factors on willingness to consider LVAD therapy may help tailor counseling towards individual needs.
心力衰竭(HF)病情恶化及健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)已被证明会影响左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入决策,但对于社会经济因素如何影响患者对LVAD的明确偏好知之甚少。
晚期收缩性HF门诊患者(n = 353)阅读了关于LVAD治疗的书面信息,并完成了一项简短调查,以表明他们是否希望使用LVAD来治疗其当前的HF水平。有序逻辑回归分析确定了LVAD偏好的临床和人口统计学预测因素。较高的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、堪萨斯城心肌病问卷测量的较差HRQOL、较低的教育水平和较低的收入是患者希望使用LVAD的显著单变量预测因素。在多变量模型中,较高的NYHA分级(比值比[OR]:1.43,置信区间[CI]:1.08 - 1.90,P = 0.013)和较低的收入水平(对于<$40,000与>$80,000,OR:2.10,CI:1.18 - 3.76,P = 0.012)仍然与希望使用LVAD显著相关。
在晚期收缩性HF门诊患者中,对LVAD的治疗偏好受收入水平影响,而与HF严重程度无关。了解社会经济因素对考虑LVAD治疗意愿的影响可能有助于根据个体需求调整咨询。