Maśko Malgorzata, Zdrojkowski Lukasz, Domino Malgorzata, Jasinski Tomasz, Gajewski Zdzislaw
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Large Animal Diseases with Clinic, Veterinary Research Centre and Center for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 7;9(12):1095. doi: 10.3390/ani9121095.
The natural head and neck position (HNP) of horses differs from the position in horse riding when bit is used. The special lunging aids (LAs) are applied in order to modify HNP. Different types of LAs have the potential to affect the work of horse muscles and the superficial thermographic patterns (STPs). The effects of thre LAs on STPs of neck, chest, back, and hindquarters were investigated.
Sixteen leisure horses were lunged with freely moving head (FMH), rubber band (RB), chambon (CH), and triangle side reins (TRs). The thermographic images (n = 896) were analyzed before/after lunging for mean temperatures (T) and minimum-maximum difference (T).
Superficial T increased ( < 0.001) in cranial part of neck, back, thoracic area, and limbs after lunging regardless of LAs application or its type. In comparison to other LAs: With RB, T was higher in regions of interest (ROIs) 2,7 and lower in ROIs 3-4 ( < 0.05); with CH, T was higher in ROIs 2-4 and 7 ( < 0.01); and with TRs, T was higher in ROIs 2-4,7,9-11 ( < 0.01). In ROIs 2-4 and 7, T was lower with LAs than with FMH ( < 0.01) and in ROIs 9-10 with TRs.
The choice of LAs should be dictated by the expected effect; however, all LAs increase the quality of the leisure horse lunging. LA use is more desirable than lunging with FMH.
马的自然头颈部位置(HNP)与使用马嚼子时骑马的位置不同。应用特殊的牵遛辅助工具(LAs)来改变HNP。不同类型的LAs有可能影响马肌肉的工作和体表热成像模式(STPs)。研究了三种LAs对颈部、胸部、背部和后躯STPs的影响。
16匹休闲马分别使用自由移动头部(FMH)、橡皮筋(RB)、尚邦(CH)和三角侧缰(TRs)进行牵遛。在牵遛前后分析热成像图像(n = 896)的平均温度(T)和最小-最大温差(T)。
无论是否应用LAs及其类型,牵遛后颈部、背部、胸部区域和四肢的体表温度均升高(<0.001)。与其他LAs相比:使用RB时,感兴趣区域(ROIs)2、7的温度较高,ROIs 3-4的温度较低(<0.05);使用CH时,ROIs 2-4和7的温度较高(<0.01);使用TRs时,ROIs 2-4、7、9-11的温度较高(<0.01)。在ROIs 2-4和7中,使用LAs时的温度低于使用FMH时的温度(<0.01),在使用TRs的ROIs 9-10中也是如此。
LAs的选择应根据预期效果来决定;然而,所有LAs都提高了休闲马牵遛的质量。使用LAs比使用FMH牵遛更可取。