Meros Gladistone C, Gonini Alcides Jr, Lopes Murilo B, Paranhos Luis R, Suzuki Selly S, Garcez Aguinaldo S
Department of Orthodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School and Research Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil -
School of Dentistry, University of North Parana, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
Minerva Stomatol. 2019 Oct;68(5):265-272. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04204-3.
This study aims to evaluate tension distribution in the anterior region of the mandible during two orthodontic mechanical approaches to treat anterior open bite.
It was an in-vitro experimental study, that analyzed 5 models of photoelastic resin, simulating a lower dental arch. The anterior teeth underwent orthodontic forces of the Blue Elgiloy® 0.016" x 0.022" (MEAW technique) and Gummetal® 0.018"x 0.022" (GEAW technique) archwires. Tension distribution was assessed on three different points in the lower dental midline and was measured using a reflection polariscope. The archwires were evaluated with and without anterior elastic bands (6 oz, 170 g) installed between lateral incisors and lower canines, as recommended for anterior open bite.
The highest magnitudes of tension generated by the archwires were observed in the cervical regions of the teeth (on average 50% higher than those at the most apical point) regardless of the technique used. Comparatively, the GEAW technique showed significantly (P<0.05) lower tension values (16 MPa) than the MEAW technique using Blue Elgiloy (24 MPa).
The GEAW technique showed a more favorable tension distribution pattern than the MEAW approach. The use of elastic bands improved tension distribution, regardless of the technique. The results also suggest that the use of anterior elastic bands in both techniques reduced the tensions released by the intrusive forces generated by the archwires.
本研究旨在评估两种正畸力学方法治疗前牙开颌时下颌前部区域的张力分布情况。
这是一项体外实验研究,分析了5个模拟下颌牙弓的光弹性树脂模型。前牙施加了Blue Elgiloy® 0.016" x 0.022"(多曲方丝弓技术)和Gummetal® 0.018"x 0.022"(通用方丝弓技术)弓丝的正畸力。在下颌牙中线的三个不同点评估张力分布,并使用反射式偏光镜进行测量。按照前牙开颌的推荐方法,在侧切牙和下尖牙之间安装和不安装前弹力带(6盎司,170克)的情况下对弓丝进行评估。
无论使用何种技术,在牙齿颈部区域观察到弓丝产生的张力最大值(平均比最根尖点处高50%)。相比之下,通用方丝弓技术显示的张力值(16兆帕)明显(P<0.05)低于使用Blue Elgiloy(24兆帕)的多曲方丝弓技术。
通用方丝弓技术显示出比多曲方丝弓方法更有利张力分布模式。弹力带的使用改善了张力分布,与技术无关。结果还表明,在两种技术中使用前弹力带均降低了弓丝产生的侵入力释放的张力。