Bahamonde Héctor A, Fernández Victoria, Gyenge Javier, Mattenet Francisco, Peri Pablo L
Department of Forestry Research, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Santa Cruz, Argentina.
Department of Natural Resources, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA), Río Gallegos, Argentina.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 27;10:1542. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01542. eCollection 2019.
Nutrient resorption is crucial for mineral element conservation and efficiency of forest species, but knowledge on its significance and the mechanisms involved is still limited for most species and habitats. Focusing on the harsh conditions for plant growth and survival of southern Patagonia, a field study for comparing the rate of foliar resorption of macro-, micro-nutrients, and trace elements in coexisting and forests was performed. Forests located in three contrasting productivity sites (with different soil and climatic conditions) were selected, and mature, functional versus senescent leaves of both species were collected at two different dates of the growing season. Macro- (N, P, Ca, K, S, and Mg), micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Ni), and trace elements (Al, Li, Pb, Rb, Sr, Ti, and Tl) were determined in foliar tissues. The mineral element concentrations of mature and senescent leaves were used for calculating the nutrient resorption efficiency (NuR). In general, and making an average of all sites and species, macro-nutrient resorption showed a decreasing trend for N > S = K > P > Mg, being Ca the only macro-nutrient with negative values (i.e., no resorption). Resorption of the majority of the elements did not vary between species in any of the evaluated sites. Variation across sites in nutrient resorption efficiency for most macronutrients, some micronutrients, and trace elements was observed for , whereas had a similar NuR for all experimental sites. On the other hand, regardless of the site or the species, some elements were not resorbed (e.g., B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Al, and Ti). It is concluded that both species performed similarly concerning their nutrient conservation strategy, when coexisting in the same mixed forest. However, no evidence was gained for an increased rate of foliar NuR in association with the sites subjected to more limiting soil and climatic conditions for plant growth.
养分再吸收对于森林物种的矿质元素保存和效率至关重要,但对于大多数物种和栖息地而言,关于其重要性及相关机制的认识仍然有限。以南巴塔哥尼亚地区严酷的植物生长和生存条件为重点,开展了一项田间研究,比较共存森林中大量元素、微量元素和痕量元素的叶片再吸收速率。选取了位于三个生产力对比明显的地点(土壤和气候条件不同)的森林,并在生长季节的两个不同日期采集了两种树种成熟、功能叶与衰老叶。测定了叶片组织中的大量元素(氮、磷、钙、钾、硫和镁)、微量元素(硼、铜、铁、锰、锌和镍)以及痕量元素(铝、锂、铅、铷、锶、钛和铊)。利用成熟叶和衰老叶的矿质元素浓度计算养分再吸收效率(NuR)。总体而言,综合所有地点和物种来看,大量元素再吸收呈现出氮>硫 = 钾>磷>镁的下降趋势,钙是唯一再吸收值为负(即无再吸收)的大量元素。在任何一个评估地点,大多数元素的再吸收在物种间并无差异。对于大多数大量元素、一些微量元素和痕量元素,观察到不同地点间养分再吸收效率存在差异,但所有实验地点的养分再吸收效率相似。另一方面,无论地点或物种如何,一些元素未被再吸收(例如硼、铜、铁、锰、铝和钛)。得出的结论是,当两种树种共存于同一混交林时,它们在养分保存策略方面表现相似。然而,没有证据表明在植物生长受到更具限制性的土壤和气候条件影响的地点,叶片养分再吸收速率会增加。