University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Duluth, Minneapolis.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7299. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7299.
To design, implement, and assess the use of "educational prescriptions" or Education Rx assignments in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) in ambulatory care, and to assess the impact of the assignments on Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' self-efficacy to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM). Students enrolled in select ambulatory care APPEs completed up to four Education Rx assignments. The assignments required students to report the context of the question, source of information, results, appraisal of validity, and relevance of the evidence, and to answer the clinical question. A rubric was used that contained three subparts: a patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) conformity score (8 points), presence of answer to the PICO (1 point), and quality of answer to the PICO (6 points). Demographic information was collected and students were surveyed at the end of the APPE to rate their self-efficacy executing seven evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. Thirty students completed 110 Education Rxs. The average score (SD) was 13.6 (2.2) with a PICO conformity subsection score of 7.3 (1.3), and quality of answer subsection score of 5.3 (1.2). Only one Education Rx did not have an answer. Students consulted point-of-care references for a majority of the answers (65%). Sixteen (53%) students completed the self-assessment survey, and all strongly agreed or agreed that the Education Rx activity improved their ability to formulate a well-constructed clinical question and evaluate and apply the evidence. Through Education Rxs, PharmD students' self-confidence and their skills in finding answers to clinical questions increased.
设计、实施和评估“教育处方”或教育 Rx 作业在门诊高级药学实践经验 (APPE) 中的使用,并评估这些作业对药学博士 (PharmD) 学生实践循证医学 (EBM) 自我效能的影响。 在选定的门诊 APPE 中注册的学生完成了多达四个教育 Rx 作业。作业要求学生报告问题的背景、信息来源、结果、证据有效性和相关性,并回答临床问题。使用的评分标准包含三个部分:患者/人群 (P)、干预 (I)、比较 (C)、结果 (O) (PICO) 一致性评分 (8 分)、回答 PICO (1 分)、回答 PICO 的质量 (6 分)。收集了人口统计学信息,学生在 APPE 结束时接受调查,以评估他们执行七个循证医学 (EBM) 技能的自我效能。 30 名学生完成了 110 个教育 Rx。平均得分为 13.6(2.2),PICO 一致性部分得分为 7.3(1.3),回答质量部分得分为 5.3(1.2)。只有一个教育 Rx 没有答案。学生查阅了大多数答案的即时参考资料 (65%)。16 名 (53%)学生完成了自我评估调查,所有人都强烈同意或同意教育 Rx 活动提高了他们提出精心构建的临床问题以及评估和应用证据的能力。 通过教育 Rx,PharmD 学生的自信心和解决临床问题的能力得到了提高。