• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Educational Prescriptions to Document Evidence-Based Medicine Questions in Ambulatory Care Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.在门诊护理高级药学实践经验中记录基于证据的医学问题的教育处方。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7299. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7299.
2
An evidence-based medicine elective course to improve student performance in advanced pharmacy practice experiences.一门循证医学选修课程,旨在提高学生在高级药学实践经验中的表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Feb 10;75(1):9. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7519.
3
Longitudinal Assessment of Pharmacy Students' Confidence and Skill in Providing Evidence-based Answers to Clinical Questions.药学专业学生提供循证临床问题解答的信心和技能的纵向评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Oct;84(10):ajpe7884. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7884.
4
Assessment of a Scholars Program Designed to Enhance Pharmacy Students' Competitiveness for Postgraduate Residency Training.评估一项旨在提高药学学生研究生住院医师培训竞争力的学者计划。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7728. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7728.
5
A classroom-based patient case activity as a potential formative indicator of pre-advanced pharmacy practice experience readiness.基于课堂的患者病例活动作为高级药学实践前经验准备情况的潜在形成性指标。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Apr;14(4):514-520. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Student Knowledge, Skills, and Self-Efficacy Gains After Completing an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Geriatrics.完成老年药学高级实践经验后学生的知识、技能和自我效能提升。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):156. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809156.
7
A Comparison of Student Outcomes Between Longitudinally and Traditionally Placed Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.纵向与传统安置的高级药学实践经验的学生成果比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7143. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7143.
8
Tracked Patient Encounters During Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences and Skill Self-assessment Using Entrustable Professional Activities.使用可委托专业活动追踪高级药学实践经验和技能自我评估中的患者就诊情况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7349. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7349.
9
Impact of a simulated electronic health record on pharmacy students' perceptions of preparedness for clinical practice.模拟电子健康记录对药学专业学生临床实践准备认知的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Dec;10(12):1624-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Factors That Influence Students' Selection of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience.影响学生选择高级药学实践经验的因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7404. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7404.

本文引用的文献

1
Using educational prescriptions to teach medical students evidence-based medicine.运用教育处方教授医学生循证医学。
Med Teach. 2016 Nov;38(11):1112-1117. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170775. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Designing evidence-based medicine training to optimize the transfer of skills from the classroom to clinical practice: applying the four component instructional design model.设计循证医学培训以优化技能从课堂到临床实践的转化:应用四要素教学设计模型
Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1457-61. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000769.
3
SNAPPS-Plus: an educational prescription for students to facilitate formulating and answering clinical questions.SNAPPS-Plus:一种教育处方,帮助学生制定和回答临床问题。
Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1174-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000362.
4
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.药剂教育促进中心 2013 年教育成果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162.
5
Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools.西西里岛关于循证实践学习评估工具的分类和发展的声明。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 5;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78.
6
Creation and validation of the evidence-based practice confidence scale for health care professionals.创建并验证医疗保健专业人员循证实践信心量表。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01478.x. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: psychometric properties of two new instruments.循证实践信念与实施量表:两种新工具的心理测量特性
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;5(4):208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00126.x.
8
Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.评估PICO作为临床问题的知识表示形式。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:359-63.
9
A hierarchy of effective teaching and learning to acquire competence in evidenced-based medicine.获取循证医学能力的有效教学层次体系。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Dec 15;6:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-59.
10
Sicily statement on evidence-based practice.关于循证实践的西西里声明。
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jan 5;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1.

在门诊护理高级药学实践经验中记录基于证据的医学问题的教育处方。

Educational Prescriptions to Document Evidence-Based Medicine Questions in Ambulatory Care Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

机构信息

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minneapolis.

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Duluth, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7299. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7299.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe7299
PMID:31831906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6900823/
Abstract

To design, implement, and assess the use of "educational prescriptions" or Education Rx assignments in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) in ambulatory care, and to assess the impact of the assignments on Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' self-efficacy to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM). Students enrolled in select ambulatory care APPEs completed up to four Education Rx assignments. The assignments required students to report the context of the question, source of information, results, appraisal of validity, and relevance of the evidence, and to answer the clinical question. A rubric was used that contained three subparts: a patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) conformity score (8 points), presence of answer to the PICO (1 point), and quality of answer to the PICO (6 points). Demographic information was collected and students were surveyed at the end of the APPE to rate their self-efficacy executing seven evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. Thirty students completed 110 Education Rxs. The average score (SD) was 13.6 (2.2) with a PICO conformity subsection score of 7.3 (1.3), and quality of answer subsection score of 5.3 (1.2). Only one Education Rx did not have an answer. Students consulted point-of-care references for a majority of the answers (65%). Sixteen (53%) students completed the self-assessment survey, and all strongly agreed or agreed that the Education Rx activity improved their ability to formulate a well-constructed clinical question and evaluate and apply the evidence. Through Education Rxs, PharmD students' self-confidence and their skills in finding answers to clinical questions increased.

摘要

目的

设计、实施和评估“教育处方”或教育 Rx 作业在门诊高级药学实践经验 (APPE) 中的使用,并评估这些作业对药学博士 (PharmD) 学生实践循证医学 (EBM) 自我效能的影响。 在选定的门诊 APPE 中注册的学生完成了多达四个教育 Rx 作业。作业要求学生报告问题的背景、信息来源、结果、证据有效性和相关性,并回答临床问题。使用的评分标准包含三个部分:患者/人群 (P)、干预 (I)、比较 (C)、结果 (O) (PICO) 一致性评分 (8 分)、回答 PICO (1 分)、回答 PICO 的质量 (6 分)。收集了人口统计学信息,学生在 APPE 结束时接受调查,以评估他们执行七个循证医学 (EBM) 技能的自我效能。 30 名学生完成了 110 个教育 Rx。平均得分为 13.6(2.2),PICO 一致性部分得分为 7.3(1.3),回答质量部分得分为 5.3(1.2)。只有一个教育 Rx 没有答案。学生查阅了大多数答案的即时参考资料 (65%)。16 名 (53%)学生完成了自我评估调查,所有人都强烈同意或同意教育 Rx 活动提高了他们提出精心构建的临床问题以及评估和应用证据的能力。 通过教育 Rx,PharmD 学生的自信心和解决临床问题的能力得到了提高。