A Comparison of Student Outcomes Between Longitudinally and Traditionally Placed Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

To compare performance outcomes of students completing a longitudinal pharmacy practice experience at a single site with those of students completing advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) at a variety of practice sites. Performance data and other meaningful outcomes from a cohort of students completing a six-month experience within a single health system (longitudinal group) were compared to data from a group of students completing six months of similar APPEs at multiple health systems (control group). Motivators for participating in the longitudinal program varied, with students in the program identifying practice interest alignment, schedule simplification, and desire to do a residency; and students choosing to not participate in identifying schedule flexibility and experience at a variety of practice sites. The 16 longitudinal students differed from the 20 control students at baseline in grade point average and the number of scheduled community pharmacy APPEs. Performance measures for longitudinal students and control students did not differ significantly, but the difference between students' self-perceived effort and preceptor perception of student effort was significantly different for control students compared to longitudinal students. Residency match rates and number of students receiving recognition for high academic performance were similar in the two groups. Students participating in the longitudinal program had different motivators but comparable outcomes to students who completed similar APPEs at a variety of practice sites.