Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 15;71(12):3033-3041. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1187.
Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clinical trials, but its clinical significance is incompletely understood.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia who achieved clinical cure. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and death were compared between patients with persistent growth of the index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure).
Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure. Prevalences of comorbidities, ventilator dependence, and severity of acute illness were similar between groups. Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher rates of recurrent pneumonia or death following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions, severity of acute illness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, intensive care unit placement, tracheostomy dependence, and immunocompromised status (90-day multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.35). This association was observed among patients with pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus (90-day multivariable adjusted OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.73-7.90). A trend was observed among pneumonias caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, but not Enterobacteriaceae or other pathogens.
Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associated with recurrent pneumonia or death among patients with bacterial pneumonia following clinical cure. Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to guide therapeutic interventions for patients with bacterial pneumonia.
微生物学治愈是肺炎临床试验中的常见结果,但它的临床意义尚未完全理解。
我们对因细菌肺炎住院并达到临床治愈的成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究。比较了临床治愈时(微生物学失败)和病原体清除时(微生物学治愈)指数病原体持续生长的患者之间复发肺炎和死亡的发生率。
在 441 例患者中,237 例患者达到微生物学治愈,204 例患者达到微生物学失败。两组患者的合并症、呼吸机依赖和急性疾病严重程度相似。与微生物学治愈的患者相比,微生物学失败的患者在临床治愈后发生复发性肺炎或死亡的风险显著更高,这与合并症情况、急性疾病严重程度、经验性抗生素的适当性、重症监护病房的安置、气管造口术依赖和免疫功能低下状况有关(90 天多变量调整后的比值比[OR],1.56;95%置信区间[CI],1.04-2.35)。这种关联在金黄色葡萄球菌引起的肺炎患者中观察到(90 天多变量调整后的 OR,3.69;95%CI,1.73-7.90)。非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌引起的肺炎中观察到这种趋势,但肠杆菌科或其他病原体未观察到这种趋势。
在细菌肺炎患者临床治愈后,微生物学治疗失败与复发肺炎或死亡独立相关。微生物学治愈值得进一步研究,作为指导细菌肺炎患者治疗干预的指标。