Suppr超能文献

解决不平等问题:一项改善绿地可达性和质量的干预措施评估。

Addressing Inequity: Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Accessibility and Quality of a Green Space.

机构信息

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Center for Health Promotion Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245015.

Abstract

Green space areas offer several benefits that support our physical, psychological, and social health. However, the level of engagement with green space areas may not be the same across population groups. Using a mixed-method research design, we investigated the use of a green space area and whether and how the area was beneficial for health, social inclusion, and physical activity for all socioeconomic groups in a suburban area in Norway. The study showed significantly increased use of the area from 2015-2018 and that users belonged to different socioeconomic groups. The motivation for using the area was the opportunity to experience nature and to interact socially. While no significant changes in self-rated health, life satisfaction, or levels of physical activity were found, the study indicates that factors such as location, availability, and designated places for social interaction are important motivating factors for use. Users from the lower socioeconomic groups were among the frequent users but were also the least satisfied with the quality and availability of the path. Our findings call for closer consideration of the location and availability of green spaces and that including places for social interaction and relaxation can contribute to increased use of green spaces.

摘要

绿地为我们的身心健康提供了多种益处。然而,不同人群对绿地的参与程度可能并不相同。本研究采用混合方法设计,调查了挪威郊区一个绿地区域的使用情况,以及该区域对所有社会经济群体的健康、社会包容和体育活动的有益程度。研究表明,从 2015 年到 2018 年,该区域的使用显著增加,且使用者来自不同的社会经济群体。使用该区域的动机是体验自然和进行社交互动的机会。尽管自我评估的健康状况、生活满意度或身体活动水平没有显著变化,但研究表明,位置、可用性和指定的社交互动场所等因素是使用的重要激励因素。来自较低社会经济群体的使用者是经常使用者之一,但对路径的质量和可用性最不满意。我们的研究结果呼吁更加关注绿地的位置和可用性,并且包括社交互动和放松的场所可以促进对绿地的更多使用。

相似文献

1
Addressing Inequity: Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Accessibility and Quality of a Green Space.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245015.
2
Is level of neighbourhood green space associated with physical activity in green space?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Nov 13;10:127. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-127.
3
Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 16;14(5):535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050535.
4
Green Space Visits among Adolescents: Frequency and Predictors in the PIAMA Birth Cohort Study.
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 30;126(4):047016. doi: 10.1289/EHP2429.
5
Green Space Attachment and Health: A Comparative Study in Two Urban Neighborhoods.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 12;12(11):14342-63. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114342.
6
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility-Evidence from a Southern European City.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080916.
8
Does Residents' Satisfaction with the Neighbourhood Environment Relate to Residents' Self-Rated Health? Evidence from Beijing.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5051. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245051.
9
A cross-sectional analysis of green space prevalence and mental wellbeing in England.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 17;17(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4401-x.
10
The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Mar;70(3):253-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205954. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

5
The 2024 Europe report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: unprecedented warming demands unprecedented action.
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Jul;9(7):e495-e522. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00055-0. Epub 2024 May 12.
6
Built Environment Accessibility and Disability as Predictors of Well-Being among Older Adults: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 20;20(10):5898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105898.
8

本文引用的文献

1
How important is perception of safety to park use? A four-city survey.
Urban Stud. 2016 Sep;53(12):2624-2636. doi: 10.1177/0042098015592822. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
3
Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 12;116(11):5188-5193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807504116. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 4;16(3):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030452.
7
The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes.
Environ Res. 2018 Oct;166:628-637. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Governance for public health and health equity: The Tröndelag model for public health work.
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(22_suppl):37-47. doi: 10.1177/1403494818765704.
10
Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1118-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209201. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验