Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
URI - Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.036. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
To investigate risk factors for and outcomes in pathological T3a-upstaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), as Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging for T3a RCC was recently revised.
Multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with clinical T1-T2 RCC, stratified by occurrence of pathologic T3a-upstaging. Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariable analyses (MVA) were conducted for upstaging and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) was utilized for RFS and overall survival (OS).
We analyzed 2573 patients (1223 RN/1350 PN). Upstaging occurred in 360 (14.0%). On MVA, higher clinical stage was associated with increasing risk of upstaging [cT1a (referent), odds ratio for cT1b, cT2a, and cT2b was 2.6, 6.5, and 14.1, P < .001]. Higher clinical stage at presentation correlated with increasing risk of recurrence in pT3a-upstaged RCC (cT1a upstaged-pT3a [referent], hazard ratio [HR] for cT1b, cT2a, and cT2b upstaged pT3a was 1.16 [P = .729], 3.02 [P = .013], and 4.5 [P = .003]). Perirenal fat (HR 1.6, P = .038) and renal vein (HR 2.2, P = .006) invasion were associated with increased risk of recurrence; type of surgery was not (P = .157). KMA for RFS and OS in pT3a-upstaged patients demonstrated differences based on initial clinical stage (5-year PFS for cT1a/b, and cT2 upstaged was 84.5%/72.8%, and 44.7%, P < .001; 5-year OS for cT1 and cT2 upstaged was 83.8% and 63.2%, P < .001).
Risk of pT3a-upstaging and recurrence in pT3a-upstaged RCC correlates with clinical stage at presentation. Renal vein and perinephric fat invasion were associated with increased risk of recurrence. PN did not increase risk of recurrence and potential of pT3a-upstaging should not deter consideration of PN.
探讨肾细胞癌(RCC)病理性 T3a 升级的危险因素和结局,因为 T3a RCC 的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期最近已经修订。
对临床 T1-T2 RCC 患者进行多中心回顾性分析,按发生病理 T3a 升级情况进行分层。主要结局是无复发生存率(RFS)。进行多变量分析(MVA)以确定升级和复发的因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析(KMA)用于 RFS 和总生存期(OS)。
我们分析了 2573 名患者(1223 名 RN/1350 名 PN)。360 名(14.0%)患者发生升级。在 MVA 中,较高的临床分期与升级风险增加相关[cT1a(参考),cT1b、cT2a 和 cT2b 的优势比分别为 2.6、6.5 和 14.1,P<.001]。在 pT3a 升级的 RCC 中,较高的临床分期与复发风险增加相关[cT1a 升级为 pT3a(参考),cT1b、cT2a 和 cT2b 升级为 pT3a 的危险比(HR)分别为 1.16(P=0.729)、3.02(P=0.013)和 4.5(P=0.003)]。肾周脂肪(HR 1.6,P=0.038)和肾静脉(HR 2.2,P=0.006)侵犯与复发风险增加相关;手术类型无相关性(P=0.157)。在 pT3a 升级患者中,KMA 对 RFS 和 OS 的分析显示,基于初始临床分期存在差异(cT1a/b 和 cT2 升级患者的 5 年 PFS 为 84.5%/72.8%和 44.7%,P<.001;cT1 和 cT2 升级患者的 5 年 OS 为 83.8%和 63.2%,P<.001)。
pT3a 升级患者的 pT3a 升级和复发风险与就诊时的临床分期相关。肾静脉和肾周脂肪侵犯与复发风险增加相关。PN 不会增加复发风险,且 pT3a 升级的可能性不应阻止对 PN 的考虑。