Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):798.e9-798.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
Renal tumor biopsies (RTB) have been proposed as a means to diminish overtreatment of small renal masses. A potential concern of RTB is tumor seeding along the biopsy tract leading to worse clinical outcomes.
To evaluate whether RTB was associated with greater upstaging to pT3a compared to patients without a biopsy and to determine if pathologic upstaging affects the risk of recurrence.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system was used to identify patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for malignant renal tumors ≤ 4cm (cT1a) between January 1, 2011 and July 2, 2019.
RTB prior to nephrectomy or nephrectomy without biopsy.
Upstaging to pT3a and cancer recurrence were compared between subjects that had a RTB compared to those who did not. A multivariable analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with disease upstaging and recurrence.
The cohort consisted of 1993 cT1a patients, followed for a median of 17.5 months. Of these patients, 502 (25%) had a preoperative RTB. There was no difference in the proportion with tumor upstaging to pT3a between patients that had RTB compared to those who did not (7.2% vs. 6.3%; P = 0.5). On multivariable analysis, RTB was not associated with pathological upstaging (Odds Ratio 0.90; 95% Confidence Interval 0.61-1.34) or recurrence (Odds Ratio 1.04; 95% Confidence Interval 0.57-1.89). The main limitation is that the study is underpowered to detect small differences between groups.
In this large, multi-institution cohort, RTB was not associated with increased risk of tumor upstaging or recurrence. Hence, tumor tract seeding, although possible, should not be a clinical deterrent to using RTBs as a means of personalizing renal masses management and diminishing overtreatment.
Recent evidence suggests that tumor seeding following RTB may be more common than initially perceived. Our results have demonstrated that RTB was not associated with an increased risk of tumor upstaging or disease recurrence.
肾肿瘤活检(RTB)已被提议作为减少小肾肿瘤过度治疗的一种手段。RTB 的一个潜在问题是肿瘤沿着活检道播种,导致更差的临床结果。
评估 RTB 是否与比未行活检的患者更高的 pT3a 分期有关,并确定病理分期是否会影响复发的风险。
设计、地点和参与者:使用加拿大肾脏癌信息系统(Canadian Kidney Cancer information system)确定 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 2 日期间接受根治性或部分肾切除术治疗≤4cm(cT1a)恶性肾肿瘤的患者。
在肾切除术前或不进行肾活检的情况下进行 RTB。
比较有 RTB 的患者与无 RTB 的患者之间 pT3a 分期和癌症复发情况。使用多变量分析评估与疾病分期和复发相关的因素。
该队列包括 1993 名 cT1a 患者,中位随访时间为 17.5 个月。这些患者中有 502 名(25%)术前进行了 RTB。有 RTB 的患者与无 RTB 的患者相比,肿瘤 pT3a 分期的比例没有差异(7.2%比 6.3%;P=0.5)。多变量分析显示,RTB 与病理分期(优势比 0.90;95%置信区间 0.61-1.34)或复发(优势比 1.04;95%置信区间 0.57-1.89)无关。主要局限性是该研究没有足够的能力检测组间的微小差异。
在这项大型多机构队列研究中,RTB 与肿瘤分期升高或复发风险增加无关。因此,虽然肿瘤播种可能存在,但不应成为使用 RTB 作为个性化肾肿瘤管理和减少过度治疗手段的临床障碍。
最近的证据表明,RTB 后肿瘤播种可能比最初认为的更为常见。我们的研究结果表明,RTB 与肿瘤分期升高或疾病复发风险增加无关。