Saraiya Tanya, Fareri Dominic, López-Castro Teresa, Hien Denise, Fertuck Eric, Melara Robert
Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA.
Psychology Department, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 29;10(1):1697582. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1697582. eCollection 2019.
: Misappraisals in evaluating the trustworthiness of others may be one mechanism contributing to the interpersonal difficulties individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) face. : This study used a translational experimental design to examine the behavioural and neural correlates underlying the appraisal of facial stimuli morphed on dimensions of trustworthiness across three groups: individuals with high posttraumatic stress symptoms (HPTS), low posttraumatic stress symptoms (LPTS), and healthy controls (HC). : Participants (N = 70) rated how trustworthy to untrustworthy they perceived three facial morphs (trustworthy, neutral, and untrustworthy) while undergoing electroencephalography (EEG). : Behavioural results showed that the HPTS group rated the untrustworthy morph as more untrustworthy than the HC group (β 0.20, SE = .07, 95% CI [0.06, 0.33], z = 2.88, = .004). The HPTS group also showed no variation in response time across morphs ( (2) = 0.92, = 0.63), while the LPTS and HC groups did ( (2) = 9.60, = .008; (2) = 23.62, < .001). EEG data revealed significant group by morph interactions at the N170 latency and the Vertex Positive Potential (VPP): the HPTS and LPTS identified the untrustworthy morph faster than the HCs, but diverged to the degree to which they encoded each facial morph. : Taken together our results suggest that HPTS individuals demonstrate an early attentional avoidance of faces morphed on dimensions of trustworthiness. This early, preconscious, avoidance may be one mechanism contributing to the miscalculations individuals with PTSD make in interpersonal situations.
对他人可信度评估中的错误判断可能是导致创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者面临人际困难的一种机制。本研究采用转化实验设计,以检验在三组人群中对面部刺激在可信度维度上进行变形评估时所涉及的行为和神经关联:高创伤后应激症状个体(HPTS)、低创伤后应激症状个体(LPTS)和健康对照组(HC)。参与者(N = 七十)在进行脑电图(EEG)时,对三种面部变形(可信、中性和不可信)从可信到不可信的程度进行评分。行为结果显示,HPTS组将不可信变形评为比HC组更不可信(β = 0.20,标准误 = 0.07,95%置信区间[0.06, 0.33],z = 2.88,p = 0.004)。HPTS组在不同变形间的反应时间也没有差异(F(2) = 0.92,p = 0.63),而LPTS组和HC组有差异(F(2) = 9.60,p = 0.008;F(2) = 23.62,p < 0.001)。EEG数据显示,在N170潜伏期和头顶正电位(VPP)处存在显著的组与变形交互作用:HPTS组和LPTS组比HC组更快识别出不可信变形,但在对面部变形的编码程度上存在差异。综合来看,我们的结果表明,HPTS个体在对基于可信度维度变形的面部存在早期注意回避。这种早期的、前意识的回避可能是导致PTSD患者在人际情境中出现误判的一种机制。