• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期视觉处理过程中的异常与过度社交及对面部可信度的非典型评估有关:一项针对威廉姆斯综合征的事件相关电位研究。

Abnormalities in early visual processes are linked to hypersociability and atypical evaluation of facial trustworthiness: An ERP study with Williams syndrome.

作者信息

Shore Danielle M, Ng Rowena, Bellugi Ursula, Mills Debra L

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Tinbergen Building, 9 South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.

Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 51 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1002-1017. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0528-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-017-0528-6
PMID:28685402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5608800/
Abstract

Accurate assessment of trustworthiness is fundamental to successful and adaptive social behavior. Initially, people assess trustworthiness from facial appearance alone. These assessments then inform critical approach or avoid decisions. Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) exhibit a heightened social drive, especially toward strangers. This study investigated the temporal dynamics of facial trustworthiness evaluation in neurotypic adults (TD) and individuals with WS. We examined whether differences in neural activity during trustworthiness evaluation may explain increased approach motivation in WS compared to TD individuals. Event-related potentials were recorded while participants appraised faces previously rated as trustworthy or untrustworthy. TD participants showed increased sensitivity to untrustworthy faces within the first 65-90 ms, indexed by the negative-going rise of the P1 onset (oP1). The amplitude of the oP1 difference to untrustworthy minus trustworthy faces was correlated with lower approachability scores. In contrast, participants with WS showed increased N170 amplitudes to trustworthy faces. The N170 difference to low-high-trust faces was correlated with low approachability in TD and high approachability in WS. The findings suggest that hypersociability associated with WS may arise from abnormalities in the timing and organization of early visual brain activity during trustworthiness evaluation. More generally, the study provides support for the hypothesis that impairments in low-level perceptual processes can have a cascading effect on social cognition.

摘要

准确评估可信度是成功且适应性社会行为的基础。最初,人们仅从面部外观来评估可信度。这些评估随后为关键的接近或回避决策提供依据。患有威廉姆斯综合征(WS)的个体表现出增强的社交驱动力,尤其是对陌生人。本研究调查了神经典型成年人(TD)和患有WS的个体对面部可信度评估的时间动态。我们研究了可信度评估期间神经活动的差异是否可以解释与TD个体相比,WS个体中接近动机的增加。在参与者评估先前被评为可信或不可信的面孔时记录事件相关电位。TD参与者在最初的65 - 90毫秒内对不可信面孔表现出更高的敏感性,以P1起始(oP1)的负向上升为指标。oP1差异(不可信面孔减去可信面孔)的幅度与较低的可接近性得分相关。相比之下,患有WS的参与者对可信面孔表现出增加的N170幅度。N170差异(低信任度面孔到高信任度面孔)与TD中的低可接近性和WS中的高可接近性相关。研究结果表明,与WS相关的过度社交可能源于可信度评估期间早期视觉脑活动的时间和组织异常。更普遍地说,该研究为以下假设提供了支持,即低水平感知过程的损伤会对社会认知产生级联效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/b851e010a4a9/13415_2017_528_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/1fee2ec1ef27/13415_2017_528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/fde4a5c3d943/13415_2017_528_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/7d40e06e7402/13415_2017_528_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/be032963d7c1/13415_2017_528_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/b851e010a4a9/13415_2017_528_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/1fee2ec1ef27/13415_2017_528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/fde4a5c3d943/13415_2017_528_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/7d40e06e7402/13415_2017_528_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/be032963d7c1/13415_2017_528_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6e/5608800/b851e010a4a9/13415_2017_528_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Abnormalities in early visual processes are linked to hypersociability and atypical evaluation of facial trustworthiness: An ERP study with Williams syndrome.早期视觉处理过程中的异常与过度社交及对面部可信度的非典型评估有关:一项针对威廉姆斯综合征的事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1002-1017. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0528-6.
2
Face first impression of trustworthiness in Williams Syndrome: Dissociating automatic vs decision based perception.威廉姆斯综合征中面部可信度的第一印象:区分自动感知与基于决策的感知。
Cortex. 2020 Nov;132:99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Face repetition detection and social interest: An ERP study in adults with and without Williams syndrome.面孔重复检测与社会兴趣:一项针对有和没有威廉姆斯综合征的成年人的事件相关电位研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(6):652-64. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1130743. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
4
Processing of stimulus content but not of emotional valence is altered in persons with Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征患者对刺激内容而非情感效价的处理发生了改变。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):993-1009. doi: 10.1111/jir.12319. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment.面部吸引力与可信任度判断的神经时程和大脑源。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1233-1247. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0634-0.
6
Neural evidence for the subliminal processing of facial trustworthiness in infancy.婴儿期对面部可信度进行潜意识处理的神经证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 18;126:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
7
Continuous cognitive dynamics of the evaluation of trustworthiness in williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征中可信度评估的持续认知动态
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 4;3:160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00160. eCollection 2012.
8
An ERP study on the time course of facial trustworthiness appraisal.一项关于面部可信度评价时间进程的 ERP 研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Jun 8;496(3):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.066. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
9
Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.通过手动反应和眼动测量揭示的威廉姆斯综合征患者对倒置面孔的完整注意定向。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):969-81. doi: 10.1111/jir.12318. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Trust at first sight: evidence from ERPs.一见钟情的信任:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jan;9(1):63-72. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss102. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain lateralization for perceiving direction of motion is reversed in Williams syndrome and related to BUD23.威廉姆斯综合征中用于感知运动方向的大脑偏侧化是相反的,且与BUD23相关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94742-3.
2
Dissociation of early and late face-related processes in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome.自闭症谱系障碍和威廉姆斯综合征中早期和晚期面孔相关加工的分离。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 22;17(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02395-6.
3
Sensory Processing in Williams Syndrome: Individual differences and changes over time.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasoning About Trust Among Individuals With Williams Syndrome.关于威廉姆斯综合征患者之间信任的推理。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Nov;120(6):527-41. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-120.6.527.
2
Autonomic response to approachability characteristics, approach behavior, and social functioning in Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征中对可接近性特征、趋近行为和社交功能的自主反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Nov;78:159-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
3
Edge co-occurrences can account for rapid categorization of natural versus animal images.
威廉斯综合征的感觉处理:个体差异和随时间的变化。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3129-3141. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05197-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
The Effect of Trust on Gaze-Mediated Attentional Orienting.信任对目光介导的注意力定向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01554. eCollection 2020.
5
The sociability spectrum: evidence from reciprocal genetic copy number variations.社交能力谱:来自互惠遗传拷贝数变异的证据。
Mol Autism. 2020 Jun 16;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00347-0.
6
A Different Brain: Anomalies of Functional and Structural Connections in Williams Syndrome.不同的大脑:威廉姆斯综合征中功能和结构连接的异常
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 13;9:721. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00721. eCollection 2018.
7
Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment.面部吸引力与可信任度判断的神经时程和大脑源。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1233-1247. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0634-0.
边缘共现可以解释对自然图像与动物图像的快速分类。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 22;5:11400. doi: 10.1038/srep11400.
4
The tendency to trust is reflected in human brain structure.信任的倾向反映在人类大脑结构中。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.060. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
Effect of empathy trait on attention to various facial expressions: evidence from N170 and late positive potential (LPP).共情特质对各种面部表情注意力的影响:来自N170和晚期正电位(LPP)的证据。
J Physiol Anthropol. 2014 Jun 30;33(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1880-6805-33-18.
6
Evaluation of a stranger safety training programme for adults with Williams syndrome.针对威廉姆斯综合征成年人的陌生人安全培训项目评估
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Oct;58(10):903-14. doi: 10.1111/jir.12108. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
7
Tracking the dynamics of the social brain: ERP approaches for social cognitive and affective neuroscience.追踪社会脑的动态:社会认知与情感神经科学的事件相关电位研究方法
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):385-93. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst177. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
8
Genetic mapping of brain plasticity across development in Williams syndrome: ERP markers of face and language processing.威廉姆斯综合征发育过程中大脑可塑性的基因图谱:面部和语言加工的事件相关电位标记
Dev Neuropsychol. 2013;38(8):613-42. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2013.825617.
9
Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?社会效用判断是否会影响注意力加工?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
Early visual ERPs are influenced by individual emotional skills.早期视觉事件相关电位受个体情绪技能的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Aug;9(8):1089-98. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst084. Epub 2013 May 28.