Suppr超能文献

新血压表型的发现及其与日常临床实践中袖带设备准确性的关系。

Discovery of New Blood Pressure Phenotypes and Relation to Accuracy of Cuff Devices Used in Daily Clinical Practice.

机构信息

From the Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (D.S.P., M.G.S., X.P., J.A.B., N.D., P.R.-T., J.E.S.).

Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia (J.A.B., N.D., P.R.-T.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1239-1247. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10696. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Abstract

Cuff blood pressure (BP) is the reference standard for management of high BP, but the method is inaccurate and can lead to BP misclassification. The aims of this study were to determine whether distinctive BP phenotypes exist based on BP transmission (amplification) variability from central-to-peripheral arteries and whether applying one standard cuff BP measurement approach (eg, oscillometry) to all people could discriminate the BP phenotypes. Intra-arterial BP was measured at the ascending aorta and brachial and radial arteries in 126 participants (61±10 years; 69% male) after coronary angiography. Central-to-peripheral systolic BP (SBP) transmission (SBP amplification) was defined by ≥5 mm Hg SBP increase between the aorta-to-brachial or brachial-to-radial arteries. Standard cuff BP was measured 4 different times using 3 different devices. Three independent investigators also provided data (n=255 from 4 studies) using another 3 separate cuff BP devices. Four distinct BP phenotypes were discovered based on variability in SBP amplification: phenotype 1, both aortic-to-brachial and brachial-to-radial SBP amplification; phenotype 2, only aortic-to-brachial SBP amplification; phenotype 3, only brachial-to-radial SBP amplification; and phenotype 4, neither aortic-to-brachial nor brachial-to-radial SBP amplification. Aortic SBP was significantly higher among phenotypes 3 and 4 compared with phenotypes 1 and 2 (=0.00074), but this was not discriminated using any standard cuff BP measures (=0.31). Data from independent investigators confirmed the key findings. This is the first-in-human discovery of BP phenotypes that have significantly different BPs, but which are not discriminated by standard cuff BP devices used in daily clinical practice. Improved BP device accuracy may be achieved by considering individual phenotypic BP differences.

摘要

袖口血压(BP)是管理高血压的参考标准,但该方法不准确,可能导致 BP 分类错误。本研究旨在确定基于从中枢动脉到外周动脉的 BP 传递(放大)变异性是否存在不同的 BP 表型,以及是否可以应用一种标准袖口 BP 测量方法(例如,振荡法)来区分所有人群的 BP 表型。在冠状动脉造影后,126 名参与者(61±10 岁;69%为男性)接受了升主动脉和肱动脉及桡动脉的动脉内 BP 测量。主动脉至肱动脉或肱动脉至桡动脉之间的 SBP 增加≥5mmHg 定义为中心至外周 SBP 传递(SBP 放大)。使用 3 种不同的设备,标准袖口 BP 测量了 4 次。3 位独立研究者还使用另外 3 种不同的袖口 BP 设备提供了数据(来自 4 项研究的 255 名参与者)。根据 SBP 放大的变异性发现了 4 种不同的 BP 表型:表型 1,主动脉至肱动脉和肱动脉至桡动脉的 SBP 放大均存在;表型 2,仅主动脉至肱动脉 SBP 放大;表型 3,仅肱动脉至桡动脉 SBP 放大;表型 4,主动脉至肱动脉和肱动脉至桡动脉的 SBP 放大均不存在。与表型 1 和表型 2 相比,表型 3 和表型 4 的主动脉 SBP 明显更高(=0.00074),但这无法通过任何标准袖口 BP 测量值区分(=0.31)。独立研究者的数据证实了这些关键发现。这是首次在人体内发现的 BP 表型具有明显不同的 BP,但这些表型无法通过日常临床实践中使用的标准袖口 BP 设备区分。通过考虑个体的表型 BP 差异,可能会提高 BP 设备的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验