Dale Marian L, Scott Emmi P, Khalid Saher, Eiseman Andrew S, Turner Travis H
1The Murray Center for Research on Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders and CurePSP Center of Care, Medical University of South Carolina, 208B Rutledge Ave MSC 108, Charleston, SC 29425 USA.
Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Neurology, Portland, OR USA.
J Clin Mov Disord. 2019 Dec 6;6:6. doi: 10.1186/s40734-019-0081-2. eCollection 2019.
Reliable detection of slowed vertical saccades may help discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from the subset of Parkinson's disease patients who lack tremor (akinetic-rigid or PD-postural instability and gait disorder PIGD subtype), and from age-related oculomotor changes. We investigated the feasibility of a camera-less computerized behavioral saccade latency paradigm previously validated in PD to discriminate probable PSP-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) from PD-PIGD and age-matched controls.
In this proof-of-concept case-control study, reflexive saccade latencies were measured in 5 subjects with probable PSP-RS, 5 subjects with PD-PIGD subtype, and 5 age-matched controls using the behavioral paradigm. The battery was repeated approximately one month later. All subjects were examined off levodopa by a movement disorders neurologist and by an ophthalmologist, who also performed a dilated eye exam.
Vertical prosaccade latencies were longer in the PSP group (median = 903 ms) relative to PD (median = 268 ms) and control groups (median = 235 ms), with no overlap between groups (100% accuracy). PSP subjects also had larger vertical-horizontal discrepancies than comparison groups. Test-retest reliability for the behavioral saccade measures was good (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [0.856, 0.982]), and the measures strongly correlated with clinical ratings.
Computerized behavioral measurement of reflexive saccade latency is feasible in PSP, and potentially discriminates probable PSP-RS from the PD-PIGD subtype. Findings from this proof-of-concept study support utility of the approach for obtaining objective saccade metrics in clinical evaluations and for tracking change in future, larger trials of moderately advanced PSP. Future studies should also examine the behavioral paradigm in earlier presentations of PSP and other subtypes of PSP.
可靠检测垂直扫视减慢可能有助于将进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)与缺乏震颤的帕金森病患者亚组(运动不能-强直型或帕金森病-姿势不稳和步态障碍PIGD亚型)以及与年龄相关的动眼神经变化区分开来。我们研究了一种先前在帕金森病中验证过的无摄像头计算机化行为扫视潜伏期范式在区分可能的PSP-理查森综合征(PSP-RS)与PD-PIGD及年龄匹配对照方面的可行性。
在这项概念验证性病例对照研究中,使用行为范式对5例可能的PSP-RS患者、5例PD-PIGD亚型患者和5例年龄匹配对照进行反射性扫视潜伏期测量。大约一个月后重复该测试组。所有受试者均在未服用左旋多巴的情况下由运动障碍神经科医生和眼科医生进行检查,眼科医生还进行了散瞳眼部检查。
与帕金森病组(中位数 = 268毫秒)和对照组(中位数 = 235毫秒)相比,PSP组的垂直前扫视潜伏期更长(中位数 = 903毫秒),组间无重叠(准确率100%)。PSP患者的垂直-水平差异也比对照组大。行为扫视测量的重测信度良好(组内相关系数 = 0.948;95%置信区间[0.856, 0.982]),且这些测量与临床评分密切相关。
计算机化行为测量反射性扫视潜伏期在PSP中是可行的,并且有可能将可能的PSP-RS与PD-PIGD亚型区分开来。这项概念验证性研究的结果支持了该方法在临床评估中获取客观扫视指标以及在未来更大规模的中度晚期PSP试验中跟踪变化的实用性。未来的研究还应在PSP的早期表现和PSP的其他亚型中检验该行为范式。