Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Laboratory Research Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, SanDonato Milanese Univerity Hospital, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Mar 26;58(4):471-486. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0725.
The early detection of perinatal brain damage in preterm and term newborns (i.e. intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia and perinatal asphyxia) still constitute an unsolved issue. To date, despite technological improvement in standard perinatal monitoring procedures, decreasing the incidence of perinatal mortality, the perinatal morbidity pattern has a flat trend. Against this background, the measurement of brain constituents could be particularly useful in the early detection of cases at risk for short-/long-term brain injury. On this scenario, the main European and US international health-care institutions promoted perinatal clinical and experimental neuroprotection research projects aimed at validating and including a panel of biomarkers in the clinical guidelines. Although this is a promising attempt, there are several limitations that do not allow biomarkers to be included in standard monitoring procedures. The main limitations are: (i) the heterogeneity of neurological complications in the perinatal period, (ii) the small cohort sizes, (iii) the lack of multicenter investigations, (iv) the different techniques for neurobiomarkers assessment, (iv) the lack of consensus for the validation of assays in biological fluids such as urine and saliva, and (v), the lack of reference curves according to measurement technique and biological fluid. In the present review we offer an up-to-date overview of the most promising developments in the use of biomarkers in the perinatal period such as calcium binding proteins (S100B protein), vasoactive agents (adrenomedullin), brain biomarkers (activin A, neuron specific enolase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1) and oxidative stress markers.
早产儿和足月儿(即脑室出血、脑室周围白质软化和围产期窒息)围产期脑损伤的早期检测仍然是一个未解决的问题。迄今为止,尽管标准围产期监测程序的技术有所提高,围产儿死亡率有所下降,但围产期发病率仍呈持平趋势。在此背景下,脑成分的测量对于早期发现有短期/长期脑损伤风险的病例可能特别有用。在这种情况下,主要的欧洲和美国国际医疗机构推动了围产期临床和实验神经保护研究项目,旨在验证并将一组生物标志物纳入临床指南。尽管这是一个有前途的尝试,但有几个限制因素不允许生物标志物纳入标准监测程序。主要限制因素包括:(i)围产期神经并发症的异质性,(ii)队列规模较小,(iii)缺乏多中心研究,(iv)神经生物标志物评估技术不同,(iv)缺乏用于验证尿液和唾液等生物体液中测定的共识,以及(v)缺乏根据测量技术和生物流体的参考曲线。在本综述中,我们提供了围产期生物标志物应用中最有前途的发展的最新概述,如钙结合蛋白(S100B 蛋白)、血管活性物质(肾上腺髓质素)、脑生物标志物(激活素 A、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白、泛素羧基末端水解酶-L1)和氧化应激标志物。