Suppr超能文献

使用 2010 年 Caprini 风险评估模型评估中国患者发生深静脉血栓的风险:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Assessing the Risk for Development of Deep Vein Thrombosis among Chinese Patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk Assessment Model: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

School of Nursing, Peking Union Medical College.

出版信息

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):801-808. doi: 10.5551/jat.51359. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Abstract

AIM

We sought to validate the 2010 Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in risk stratification for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis among Chinese bedridden patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study in 25 hospitals in China over 9 months. Patients were risk-stratified using the 2010 Caprini RAM.

RESULTS

We included a total 24,524 patients. Fresh DVT was found in 221 patients, with overall incidence of DVT 0.9%. We found a correlation of DVT incidence with Caprini score according to risk stratification (χ =196.308, P<0.001). Patients in the low-risk and moderate-risk groups had DVT incidence <0.5%. More than half of patients with DVT were in the highest risk group. Compared with the low-risk group, risk was 2.10-fold greater in the moderate-risk group, 3.34-fold greater in the high-risk group, and 16.12-fold greater in the highest-risk group with Caprini scores ≥ 9. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.78; P<0.01) for all patients. A Caprini score of ≥ 5 points was considered the criterion of a reliably increased risk of DVT in surgical patients with standard thromboprophylaxis. Predicting DVT using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 is recommended for nonsurgical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that the 2010 Caprini RAM can be effectively used to stratify hospitalized Chinese patients into DVT risk categories, based on individual risk factors. Classification of the highest risk levels using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 and ≥ 5 provides significantly greater clinical information in nonsurgical and surgical patients, respectively.

摘要

目的

我们旨在验证 2010 年卡普里风险评估模型(RAM)在中国卧床患者深静脉血栓形成(DVT)预防中的风险分层作用。

方法

我们在中国的 25 家医院进行了一项前瞻性研究。患者采用 2010 年卡普里 RAM 进行风险分层。

结果

我们共纳入了 24524 例患者。221 例患者发现新发 DVT,总体 DVT 发生率为 0.9%。我们发现根据风险分层,DVT 发生率与卡普里评分呈相关性(χ=196.308,P<0.001)。低危和中危组患者的 DVT 发生率<0.5%。高危组中超过一半的患者发生 DVT。与低危组相比,中危组的风险增加了 2.10 倍,高危组的风险增加了 3.34 倍,最高危组的风险增加了 16.12 倍,卡普里评分≥9 分。所有患者的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.74(95%置信区间,0.71-0.78;P<0.01)。卡普里评分≥5 分被认为是在标准血栓预防的手术患者中 DVT 风险显著增加的标准。建议对非手术患者采用累积风险评分≥4 预测 DVT。

结论

我们的研究表明,2010 年卡普里 RAM 可基于个体危险因素,有效地将住院中国患者分为 DVT 风险类别。使用累积风险评分≥4 和≥5 对高危患者进行分类,分别在非手术和手术患者中提供了更显著的临床信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83af/7458789/07da6359d618/jat-27-801-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验