Suppr超能文献

老年人对药品象形图的记忆

Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults.

作者信息

Vaillancourt Régis, Giby Cindy N, Murphy Bradley P, Pouliot Annie, Trinneer Anne

机构信息

, OMM, CD, BPharm, PharmD, FCSHP, is with the Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario.

, PharmD, is with Shoppers Drug Mart, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Nov-Dec;72(6):446-454. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy and high medication burden in the older adult population are contributing factors to the misunderstanding of medication instructions, leading to an increased risk of poor adherence and adverse events in this group of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of older adults to recall the meaning of 13 pharmaceutical pictograms 4 weeks after receipt of feedback on pictogram meaning.

METHODS

Older adults (aged 65 or older) were recruited from one community pharmacy in Canada. One-on-one structured interviews were conducted to assess the comprehensibility of 13 pharmaceutical pictograms from the International Pharmaceutical Federation's database of pictograms. Each participant was then told the meaning of each pictogram. Recall was assessed 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

A total of 58 participants met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. The number of pictograms meeting the ISO threshold for comprehensibility of symbols increased from 10 at the initial comprehensibility assessment to 13 at the recall assessment. Analysis of demographic data showed no associations between initial comprehensibility of the pictograms and age, sex, education level, or number of medications taken.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that after being informed of the meaning of pharmaceutical pictograms, older adults were able to recall the pictogram meanings for at least 4 weeks.

摘要

背景

老年人群健康素养低和用药负担重是导致对用药说明误解的因素,进而增加了该组患者依从性差和发生不良事件的风险。

目的

评估老年人在收到药品象形图含义反馈4周后回忆13种药品象形图含义的能力。

方法

从加拿大一家社区药房招募老年人(65岁及以上)。进行一对一的结构化访谈,以评估国际药学联合会象形图数据库中13种药品象形图的可理解性。然后告知每位参与者每种象形图的含义。4周后评估回忆情况。

结果

共有58名参与者符合纳入标准并同意参与。达到符号可理解性ISO阈值的象形图数量从初始可理解性评估时的10个增加到回忆评估时的13个。人口统计学数据分析表明,象形图的初始可理解性与年龄、性别、教育水平或服用药物数量之间无关联。

结论

本研究结果表明,在被告知药品象形图的含义后,老年人能够在至少4周内回忆起象形图的含义。

相似文献

1
Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Nov-Dec;72(6):446-454. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
2
Pictograms for safer medication handling by health care workers: a validation study in nursing students in Poland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 13;22(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08029-8.
3
Evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms by older "turkers": A cross-sectional crowdsourced study.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jun;17(6):1079-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
5
Validation of pharmaceutical pictograms among older adults with limited English proficiency.
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):909-916. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
The evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms among elderly patients in community pharmacy settings - a multicenter pilot study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Feb 14;12:257-266. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S150113. eCollection 2018.
8
Comprehensibility of pharmaceutical pictograms: Effect of prospective-user factors and cognitive sign design features.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Feb;17(2):356-361. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
Pharmaceutical pictograms: a model for development and testing for comprehension and utility.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):609-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy and health outcomes in hypertension: An integrative review.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jun 9;5(3):301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.06.001. eCollection 2018 Jul 10.
2
ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE).
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):30-35. doi: 10.7326/M18-0543. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
The extent and effects of patient involvement in pictogram design for written drug information: a short systematic review.
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Jun;23(6):1312-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 7.
5
Best-practices for the design and development of prescription medication information: A systematic review.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1351-1367. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
The evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms among elderly patients in community pharmacy settings - a multicenter pilot study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Feb 14;12:257-266. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S150113. eCollection 2018.
7
Pharmacist-Led Self-management Interventions to Improve Diabetes Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 14;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验