Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Advanced Therapies, Chicago, Illinois.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):722-725. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28657. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
To describe and compare a novel technique using a torque device to manage figure-of-eight suture tension for venous access hemostasis in patients who have undergone atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure.
Large bore venous access has become increasingly important in transcatheter procedures, but management of hemostasis can be time-consuming and/or resource intensive. As such, various techniques have sought to provide cost effective and safe alternatives to manual compression. We describe a modification of the figure-of-eight suture technique wherein we apply a torque device to manage variable suture tension instead of tying a knot and compare it to the standard figure-of-eight suture technique.
We performed a retrospective study of 40 consecutive patients who underwent ASD or PFO closure, 20 of whom underwent standard figure-of-eight technique and 20 of whom underwent figure-of-eight with torque device modification. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definitions were used to categorize bleeding events.
The groups were similar in age, gender, weight, aspirin use, platelet count, procedure time, hemoglobin, and international normalized ratio. Standard figure-of-eight suture had seven patients with bleeding, with six classified as BARC II and one as BARC I. Figure-of-eight plus torque device had three patients with bleeding, with two classified BARC II and one as BARC I. There were no incidences of hematoma in either group.
The torque device suture technique is a unique modification of the figure-of-eight suture technique to achieve venous hemostasis. In addition, the modification allows secure and variable suture tension as well as easy removal by nursing staff.
描述并比较一种使用扭力装置管理用于经导管房间隔缺损(ASD)或卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术后患者的八字形缝线张力的新型技术。
大口径静脉通路在经导管操作中变得越来越重要,但止血管理可能既耗时又/或资源密集。因此,各种技术都试图提供经济有效的替代手动压迫的方法。我们描述了一种对八字形缝线技术的改进,其中我们应用扭力装置来管理可变的缝线张力,而不是打结,并将其与标准的八字形缝线技术进行比较。
我们对 40 例连续接受 ASD 或 PFO 封堵的患者进行了回顾性研究,其中 20 例接受标准八字形技术,20 例接受八字形加扭力装置改良技术。使用出血学术研究联合会(BARC)定义对出血事件进行分类。
两组在年龄、性别、体重、阿司匹林使用、血小板计数、手术时间、血红蛋白和国际标准化比值方面相似。标准八字形缝线有 7 例患者发生出血,其中 6 例为 BARC II 级,1 例为 BARC I 级。八字形加扭力装置有 3 例患者发生出血,其中 2 例为 BARC II 级,1 例为 BARC I 级。两组均无血肿发生。
扭力装置缝线技术是对八字形缝线技术的独特改进,以实现静脉止血。此外,该改良方法允许安全且可变的缝线张力,并且易于护理人员移除。