Suppr超能文献

Figure-of-8 缝合作为介入电生理学中静脉闭合的可行性:一种策略适用于所有情况吗?

Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All?

机构信息

Cardiovascular Centre, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):965-969. doi: 10.7150/ijms.42593. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

: Venous vascular access with higher sheath size is common in interventional electrophysiology. In contrast to arterial vascular access, no dedicated closure devices exist for closure after venous access with higher sheath sizes. The Figure-of-8-Suture, an easy to apply suture, may be as a feasible approach for closure venous puncture. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of closure of femoral venous access. : From November 2016 to February 2018, patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures, closure of left atrial appendage or patent foramen ovale were included. Until May 2017, manual compression was performed to achieve haemostasis at venous access site (control group). From May 2017, patients were treated with a Figure-of-8-Suture (treatment group, Figure 1). Turnaround time and incidence of vascular complications were compared between the two groups. : In total, 290 patients were included, 132 in the control group and 158 in the Figure-of-8-Suture group. Hemostasis after sheath removal was achieved in 100% of the cases in the control group by manual compression and in 98.7% of the cases with the Figure-of-8-Suture (p=0.2). Vascular complications were more common in the control group (6.8 vs. 1.3 %, p=0.01). Turnaround time was significantly lower in the Figure-of-8-Suture group (58.6 ± 14 vs. 77 ± 33.9 min, p=0.004). In a sub-analysis in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m (Figure-of-8 n=45, controls n=35), vascular complications were significantly more common in the control group (9.4 vs 0%, p=0.045). : The Figure-of-8-Suture is an easy-to-apply, effective approach for venous closure after electrophysiological procedures.

摘要

经导管电生理检查中,常使用大鞘管进行静脉血管入路。与动脉血管入路不同,目前尚无专用的闭合装置用于大鞘管进行静脉血管入路后的闭合。“8”字缝合是一种易于操作的缝合方法,可能是一种可行的静脉穿刺闭合方法。我们旨在评估其用于闭合股静脉入路的可行性。

从 2016 年 11 月至 2018 年 2 月,纳入行电生理检查、左心耳封堵或卵圆孔未闭封堵的患者。直至 2017 年 5 月,采用手动压迫方法实现静脉入路部位止血(对照组)。自 2017 年 5 月起,采用“8”字缝合(治疗组,图 1)。比较两组患者的操作时间和血管并发症发生率。

共纳入 290 例患者,对照组 132 例,“8”字缝合组 158 例。对照组 100%(132/132)、“8”字缝合组 98.7%(156/158)的患者在鞘管拔除后实现完全止血(p=0.2)。对照组血管并发症发生率(6.8%)高于“8”字缝合组(1.3%)(p=0.01)。“8”字缝合组操作时间明显短于对照组(58.6±14 比 77±33.9 分钟,p=0.004)。在 BMI≥30 kg/m2 的肥胖患者亚组分析中(“8”字缝合组 45 例,对照组 35 例),对照组血管并发症发生率(9.4%)显著高于“8”字缝合组(0%)(p=0.045)。

“8”字缝合是一种易于操作、有效的电生理检查后静脉闭合方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8c1/7163359/6d6913697c87/ijmsv17p0965g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验