Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology.
Phoenix Landing.
J Comp Psychol. 2020 May;134(2):197-210. doi: 10.1037/com0000209. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Piagetian liquid overconservation was investigated in four grey parrots (). Birds tracked the larger of two quantities that had undergone various manipulations. Experiment 1 involved controls to ensure birds could track movement of the quantities, including direct and diagonal cross-transfers. All birds succeeded. In Experiment 2, different amounts in the same transparent or opaque containers were transferred into containers rigged such that amounts then looked equal. All birds chose the larger amounts after transformation when initial cups were transparent, but were random or had consistent side preferences when initial cups were opaque (thus obscuring quantity differences), showing that they used inferential, not perceptual, information, and that no extraneous cues existed. In Experiment 3, two birds saw different amounts from same-sized transparent or opaque containers transferred to containers of different sizes, rigged such that resultant amounts appeared to fill both cups and in which lesser amounts appeared greater on some trials. The older bird demonstrated full use of inferential abilities; he succeeded in all tasks when initial cups were transparent but, again, had consistent side preferences with initially opaque cups. The younger succeeded in the direct transfers with transparent initial cups but was random or showed a side preference on diagonal-transfer tasks and on all the tasks with opaque initial cups. However, she had no preference for the cup that appeared fuller, suggesting she did not use perceptual cues. Overall, grey parrots appear to understand the constancy of liquids undergoing physical transformation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
研究人员用 4 只灰鹦鹉()来研究皮亚杰的液体过度守恒现象。这些鸟会追踪两个数量中较大的一个,这两个数量经历了各种操作。实验 1 包括对照实验,以确保鸟类能够追踪数量的移动,包括直接和对角线的交叉转移。所有的鸟都成功了。在实验 2 中,不同数量的相同透明或不透明容器中的物品被转移到装有特殊装置的容器中,这样物品看起来就相等了。当初始杯子是透明的时,所有的鸟在转换后都选择了较大的数量,但当初始杯子是不透明的时,它们是随机的或有一致的偏好(从而掩盖了数量差异),这表明它们使用的是推理信息,而不是感知信息,而且不存在额外的线索。在实验 3 中,两只鸟从相同大小的透明或不透明容器中看到了不同数量的物品被转移到了不同大小的容器中,这些容器被特殊装置固定,使得结果看起来两个杯子都被填满了,而且在某些试验中,较小的数量看起来更大。较年长的鸟表现出了充分的推理能力;当初始杯子是透明的时,他在所有任务中都成功了,但当初始杯子是不透明的时,他又有了一致的偏好。年轻的鸟在透明初始杯子的直接转移任务中成功了,但在对角线转移任务和所有初始杯子不透明的任务中是随机的或表现出偏好。然而,她没有选择看起来更满的杯子,这表明她没有使用感知线索。总的来说,灰鹦鹉似乎理解了正在经历物理转换的液体的恒定性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。