Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H, Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):1712. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8029-x.
Increasing evidence suggests that psychological well-being (PWB) is associated with lower disease and mortality risk, and may be enhanced with relatively low-cost interventions. Yet, dissemination of these interventions remains limited, in part because insufficient attention has been paid to distinct PWB dimensions, which may impact physical health outcomes differently.
This essay first reviews the empirical evidence regarding differential relationships between all-cause mortality and multiple dimensions of PWB (e.g., life purpose, mastery, positive affect, life satisfaction, optimism). Then, individual-level positive psychology interventions aimed at increasing PWB and tested in randomized-controlled trials are reviewed as these allow for easy implementation and potentially broad outreach to improve population well-being, in concert with efforts targeting other established social determinants of health.
Several PWB dimensions relate to mortality, with varying strength of evidence. Many of positive psychology trials indicate small-to-moderate improvements in PWB; rigorous institution-level interventions are comparatively few, but preliminary results suggest benefits as well. Examples of existing health policies geared towards the improvement of population well-being are also presented. Future avenues of well-being epidemiological and intervention research, as well as policy implications, are discussed.
Although research in the fields of behavioral and psychosomatic medicine, as well as health psychology have substantially contributed to the science of PWB, this body of work has been somewhat overlooked by the public health community. Yet, the growing interest in documenting well-being, in addition to examining its determinants and consequences at a population level may provoke a shift in perspective. To cultivate optimal well-being-mental, physical, social, and spiritual-consideration of a broader set of well-being measures, rigorous studies, and interventions that can be disseminated is critically needed.
越来越多的证据表明,心理健康与较低的疾病和死亡率风险相关,并且可以通过相对低成本的干预措施来增强。然而,这些干预措施的传播仍然有限,部分原因是对不同的心理健康维度关注不足,而这些维度可能会对身体健康结果产生不同的影响。
本文首先回顾了关于全因死亡率与心理健康多个维度(如生活目标、掌控感、积极情绪、生活满意度、乐观主义)之间差异关系的实证证据。然后,综述了旨在提高心理健康并经过随机对照试验测试的个体层面的积极心理学干预措施,因为这些干预措施易于实施,并且有可能与针对其他既定健康社会决定因素的努力相结合,广泛推广以提高人口幸福感。
心理健康的几个维度与死亡率有关,其证据强度不同。许多积极心理学试验表明,心理健康有小到中度的改善;机构层面的严格干预措施相对较少,但初步结果表明也有好处。还介绍了现有的旨在改善人口幸福感的卫生政策示例。讨论了幸福感流行病学和干预研究以及政策影响的未来方向。
尽管行为和身心医学以及健康心理学领域的研究极大地促进了心理健康的科学发展,但这方面的工作在一定程度上被公共卫生界忽视了。然而,越来越关注记录幸福感,以及在人群水平上检查其决定因素和后果,可能会引发观念的转变。为了培养最佳的幸福感——心理、生理、社会和精神——需要考虑更广泛的幸福感衡量标准、严格的研究和可以传播的干预措施。