Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli", St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Division of Cellular Biotechnology and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;126(6):1243-1252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32664. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
After discontinuing ruxolitinib, the outcome of patients with myelofibrosis reportedly has been poor. The authors investigated whether disease characteristics before the receipt of ruxolitinib may predict drug discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis and whether reasons for drug discontinuation, disease phase at discontinuation, and salvage therapies may influence the outcome.
A centralized electronic clinical database was created in 20 European hematology centers, including clinical and laboratory data for 524 patients who received ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.
At 3 years, 40.8% of patients had stopped ruxolitinib. Baseline predictors of drug discontinuation were: intermediate-2-risk/high-risk category (Dynamic International Prognostic Score System), a platelet count <100 ×10 per liter, transfusion dependency, and unfavorable karyotype. At last contact, 268 patients (51.1%) had discontinued therapy, and the median drug exposure was 17.5 months. Fifty patients (18.7%) died while taking ruxolitinib. The reasons for discontinuation in the remaining 218 patients were the lack (22.9%) or loss (11.9%) of a spleen response, ruxolitinib-related adverse events (27.5%), progression to blast phase (23.4%), ruxolitinib-unrelated adverse events (9.2%), and allogeneic transplantation during response (5.1%). The median survival after ruxolitinib was 13.2 months and was significantly better in the 167 patients who discontinued ruxolitinib in chronic phase (27.5 vs 3.9 months for those who discontinued in blast phase; P < .001). No survival differences were observed among patients who discontinued ruxolitinib in chronic phase because of lack of response, loss of response, or ruxolitinib-related adverse events. The use of investigational agents and/or ruxolitinib rechallenge were associated with improved outcome.
The survival of patients with myelofibrosis after discontinuation of ruxolitinib is poor, particularly for those who discontinue in blast phase. Salvage therapies can improve outcome, emphasizing the need for novel therapies.
停止使用鲁索利替尼后,骨髓纤维化患者的预后据称较差。作者研究了骨髓纤维化患者在接受鲁索利替尼治疗前的疾病特征是否可以预测药物停药,以及停药原因、停药时疾病阶段和挽救治疗是否会影响结果。
在 20 个欧洲血液学中心建立了一个集中的电子临床数据库,其中包括 524 名接受鲁索利替尼治疗骨髓纤维化的患者的临床和实验室数据。
在 3 年内,40.8%的患者停止了鲁索利替尼治疗。药物停药的基线预测因素为:中-2 风险/高风险类别(动态国际预后评分系统)、血小板计数<100×10/L、依赖输血和不良核型。在最后一次随访时,268 名患者(51.1%)停止了治疗,药物暴露中位数为 17.5 个月。50 名患者(18.7%)在服用鲁索利替尼时死亡。其余 218 名患者停药的原因是脾脏反应缺乏(22.9%)或丧失(11.9%)、鲁索利替尼相关不良事件(27.5%)、进展为急变期(23.4%)、与鲁索利替尼无关的不良事件(9.2%)和反应期异基因移植(5.1%)。鲁索利替尼停药后的中位生存时间为 13.2 个月,在慢性期停止鲁索利替尼的 167 名患者中明显更好(急变期停药的患者为 27.5 个月和 3.9 个月;P<.001)。在慢性期因缺乏反应、反应丧失或鲁索利替尼相关不良事件而停止鲁索利替尼的患者中,未见生存差异。使用研究药物和/或鲁索利替尼再挑战与改善结果相关。
骨髓纤维化患者停止使用鲁索利替尼后的生存状况较差,特别是那些在急变期停药的患者。挽救治疗可以改善预后,强调需要新的治疗方法。