Suppr超能文献

同步整合加量放疗与序贯调强放疗治疗口咽癌或下咽癌患者的比较疗效:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析。

Comparative effectiveness of simultaneous integrated boost vs sequential intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer patients: A population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Kuo Yao-Hung, Liang Ji-An, Wang Tang-Chuan, Juan Chun-Jung, Li Chia-Chin, Chien Chun-Ru

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, E-Da Hospital.

College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(51):e18474. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018474.

Abstract

There were 2 common radiotherapy dose fractionation strategies in head-and-neck cancer patients (such as oropharyngeal cancer [OPC] or hypopharyngeal cancer [HPC]) treated with radiotherapy: intensity-modulated radiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) and sequential IMRT (IMRT-SEQ). There is a lack of high-level clinical evidence to compare IMRT-SIB vs IMRT-SEQ specifically for OPC or HPC patients. The present study investigated the survival outcomes of OPC or HPC patients receiving definite concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with either IMRT-SIB or IMRT-SEQ via a population-based propensity score (PS)-based analysis.The localized stage OPC or HPC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2015 were identified based on the Health and Welfare Data Science Center database in Taiwan. These patients received definitive CCRT with either IMRT-SIB or IMRT-SEQ. We constructed a PS-matched cohort (1:1 for IMRT-SIB vs IMRT-SEQ) to balance observable potential confounders. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death between IMRT-SIB and IMRT-SEQ during the entire follow-up period. We also evaluated other disease outcome or subgroups.Our study population constituted 200 patients with well balance in observed covariables. The HR of death when IMRT-SIB was compared to IMRT-SEQ was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.84-1.80, P = .29). The results were similar for other disease outcome or subgroups.We found the survival outcome might be comparable for those treated with IMRT-SIB vs those treated with IMRT-SEQ.

摘要

在接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者(如口咽癌[OPC]或下咽癌[HPC])中,有两种常见的放射治疗剂量分割策略:使用同步整合加量的调强放射治疗(IMRT-SIB)和序贯IMRT(IMRT-SEQ)。缺乏高级别临床证据来专门比较IMRT-SIB与IMRT-SEQ用于OPC或HPC患者的情况。本研究通过基于人群倾向评分(PS)的分析,调查了接受确定性同步放化疗(CCRT)的OPC或HPC患者采用IMRT-SIB或IMRT-SEQ后的生存结局。根据台湾健康与福利数据科学中心数据库,确定了2011年至2015年间诊断的局限性阶段OPC或HPC患者。这些患者接受了IMRT-SIB或IMRT-SEQ的确定性CCRT。我们构建了一个PS匹配队列(IMRT-SIB与IMRT-SEQ为1:1)以平衡可观察到的潜在混杂因素。我们比较了整个随访期内IMRT-SIB和IMRT-SEQ之间的死亡风险比(HR)。我们还评估了其他疾病结局或亚组。我们的研究人群包括200名患者,观察到的协变量平衡良好。IMRT-SIB与IMRT-SEQ相比的死亡HR为1.23(95%置信区间0.84-1.80,P = 0.29)。其他疾病结局或亚组的结果相似。我们发现,接受IMRT-SIB治疗的患者与接受IMRT-SEQ治疗的患者的生存结局可能相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c678/6940180/92d4287427d0/medi-98-e18474-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验