• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表希伯来文版的心理计量学测试。

Psychometric Testing of the Hebrew Version of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale.

机构信息

Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, "Rabin" Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Division of Nursing Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jul;29(7):e121-e130. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2019.10.019
PMID:31862228
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The assessment of self-care behaviour is important for tailoring care to patients and evaluating the effectiveness of heart failure (HF) disease-management programmes. The European HF Self-care Behaviour (EHFScB) scale is a validated instrument used worldwide.

AIM

The purpose of the study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the nine-item EHFScB scale in Israeli patients with HF.

METHOD

To develop the Hebrew version of the EHFScB scale, forward and back translation was performed. The psychometric evaluation was based on data from 102 patients with HF (mean age 61±12 yr, male 75%, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II 42% and NYHA class III 51%) included in two cross-sectional studies performed in 2007 and 2015-2017 in an Israeli hospital. Content validity, construct validity, known-groups validity, and discriminant validity were assessed. Reliability was evaluated with internal consistency.

RESULTS

Content validity and useability were confirmed by HF experts and patients with HF. Construct validity was tested using factor analysis and two factors were extracted (factor 1: consulting behaviour; factor 2: adherence to the regimen). Known-groups validity testing revealed a significant difference before and after an educational intervention in the total score (n=40 [41.6±23.8] vs [67.6±21.8]; p<0.01). A weak correlation between the self-care score and health-related quality of life (r= -0.299, p<0.01) was observed, showing that these concepts were related but not overlapping. Cronbach's alpha was 0.78 for the total scale, 0.76 for factor 1, and 0.68 for factor 2, suggesting that the internal consistency of this scale was acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides support for the useability, validity, and reliability of the nine-item Hebrew version of the EHFScB scale.

摘要

背景

评估自我护理行为对于针对患者调整护理和评估心力衰竭(HF)疾病管理计划的有效性非常重要。欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为(EHFScB)量表是一种在全球范围内使用的经过验证的工具。

目的

本研究旨在评估经过验证的九项 EHFScB 量表的希伯来语版本在以色列 HF 患者中的心理测量特性。

方法

为了开发 EHFScB 量表的希伯来语版本,进行了正向和反向翻译。基于 2007 年和 2015-2017 年在以色列一家医院进行的两项横断面研究中纳入的 102 例 HF 患者(平均年龄 61±12 岁,男性 75%,纽约心脏协会[NYHA]心功能分级 II 级 42%和 NYHA 心功能分级 III 级 51%)的数据进行心理测量评估。评估内容效度、结构效度、已知组有效性和判别效度。使用内部一致性评估可靠性。

结果

HF 专家和 HF 患者确认了内容效度和可用性。使用因子分析测试结构效度,并提取了两个因子(因子 1:咨询行为;因子 2:遵守治疗方案)。在教育干预前后的已知组有效性测试中,总评分(n=40 [41.6±23.8] 与 [67.6±21.8];p<0.01)显示出显著差异。自我护理评分与健康相关生活质量之间存在弱相关性(r= -0.299,p<0.01),表明这两个概念相关但不重叠。该量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.78(总量表)、0.76(因子 1)和 0.68(因子 2),表明该量表的内部一致性是可以接受的。

结论

本研究为九项 EHFScB 量表的希伯来语版本的可用性、有效性和可靠性提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Testing of the Hebrew Version of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale.欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表希伯来文版的心理计量学测试。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jul;29(7):e121-e130. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Psychometric Validation of the Korean Version of the 9-Item European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale.《9 项欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表韩国版的心理测量学验证》。
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Mar;43(1):33-40. doi: 10.1177/0163278718817946. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument.欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表修订为九项量表(EHFScB-9):一种可靠且有效的国际工具。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Jan;11(1):99-105. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfn007.
4
Validity and reliability of the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale among adults from the United States with symptomatic heart failure.美国有症状心力衰竭成人的欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Apr;12(2):214-8. doi: 10.1177/1474515112469316. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
5
Development and psychometric testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care behaviour scale caregiver version (EHFScB-C).欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表照顾者版本(EHFScB-C)的开发和心理计量学测试。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):2106-2111. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Psychometric Validation of the Mandarin Version Control Attitudes Scale-Revised Questionnaire in Taiwanese Patients With Heart Failure.中文版修订版控制态度量表在台湾心力衰竭患者中的心理测量学验证
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000431.
7
Development and psychometric properties of the Japanese heart failure knowledge scale.日本心力衰竭知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性
Int Heart J. 2013;54(4):228-33. doi: 10.1536/ihj.54.228.
8
The Greek version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale: a multidimensional or a uni-dimensional scale?9项欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表的希腊语版本:多维量表还是单维量表?
Heart Lung. 2014 Nov-Dec;43(6):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2: Further psychometric testing.心力衰竭自我护理指数量表 7.2 版:进一步的心理测量学测试。
Res Nurs Health. 2020 Dec;43(6):640-650. doi: 10.1002/nur.22083. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Psychometric Properties of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis Among Iranian Patients.采用验证性因子分析和 Rasch 分析评估伊朗心衰患者 9 项欧洲心衰自我护理行为量表的心理测量特性。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):281-288. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000444.

引用本文的文献

1
Compilation of a self-management assessment scale for postoperative patients with aortic dissection.主动脉夹层术后患者自我管理评估量表的编制
Open Med (Wars). 2024 Apr 12;19(1):20240939. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-0939. eCollection 2024.