Suppr超能文献

烧伤复苏期间输注的液体量 1980-2015:定量综述。

Fluid volumes infused during burn resuscitation 1980-2015: A quantitative review.

机构信息

Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.

Resuscitation Research Laboratory, Dept. of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

'Fluid creep' or excessive fluid delivered to burn patients during early resuscitation has been suggested by several studies from individual burn centers.

METHODS

We performed a Medline search from 1980 to 2015 in order to identify studies of burn patients predominantly resuscitated with lactated Ringers with infusion adjusted per urinary output. Data was abstracted for 48 publications (3196 patients) that met entry criteria.

RESULTS

Higher resuscitation volumes compared to Parkland estimates were reported, but the trend of increasing resuscitation volumes over the last 30 years is not supported by regression of total fluid infused versus year of study. Mean 24h fluid infused for all studies was 5.2±1.1mL/kg per %TBSA. The mean 24h urinary output reported in 30 studies was 1.2±0.5mL/kg per hr. Burns with inhalation injuries (5 studies) received significantly more fluid than non-inhalation injured burn patients (5.0±1.3 versus 3.9±0.9mL/kg per %TBSA). Fluid infused and urinary outputs were similar for adults and pediatric patients. The most striking finding of our analyses was the great ranges of the means and high standard deviations of volumes infused compared to the original Baxter publication that introduced the Parkland formula CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that burn units currently administer volumes larger than Parkland formula with great patient variability. Individual patient hourly data is needed to better understand the record of burn resuscitation and Fluid Creep.

摘要

简介

“液体迟滞”或在早期复苏期间向烧伤患者输送过多的液体,这已被来自个别烧伤中心的几项研究提出。

方法

我们对 1980 年至 2015 年的 Medline 进行了检索,以确定主要用乳酸林格氏液复苏且根据尿量调整输液量的烧伤患者的研究。为符合纳入标准的 48 篇文献(3196 例患者)提取了数据。

结果

与 Parkland 估计值相比,报告了更高的复苏量,但总输液量与研究年份的回归不支持过去 30 年复苏量增加的趋势。所有研究的平均 24 小时输液量为 5.2±1.1mL/kg per %TBSA。30 项研究报告的平均 24 小时尿量为 1.2±0.5mL/kg per hr。吸入性烧伤(5 项研究)患者接受的液体量明显多于非吸入性烧伤患者(5.0±1.3 比 3.9±0.9mL/kg per %TBSA)。成人和儿科患者的输液量和尿量相似。我们分析中最显著的发现是,与最初引入 Parkland 公式的 Baxter 出版物相比,输注量的平均值和标准差范围很大,表明目前烧伤单位给予的液体量大于 Parkland 公式,且患者间差异较大。需要个体患者每小时的数据,以更好地了解烧伤复苏和“液体迟滞”的记录。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验