Suppr超能文献

FLIP算法和SAF评分在非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者中的临床验证。

Clinical validation of the FLIP algorithm and the SAF score in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

作者信息

Nascimbeni Fabio, Bedossa Pierre, Fedchuk Larysa, Pais Raluca, Charlotte Frédéric, Lebray Pascal, Poynard Thierry, Ratziu Vlad

机构信息

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Institute for Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN).

LiverPat Paris France and Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2020 May;72(5):828-838. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Histological classifications used to diagnose/stage non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are based on morphology, with undetermined clinical correlates and relevance. We assessed the clinical relevance of the fatty liver inhibition of progression (FLIP) algorithm and the steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (SAF) scoring system.

METHODS

One hundred and forty consecutive patients with suspected NAFLD and a separate validation cohort of 78 patients enrolled in a therapeutic trial, all with central reading of liver biopsy, were included. FLIP and SAF were used to categorize patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), non-NASH NAFLD (NAFL), or non-NAFLD. The SAF activity score assessed hepatocyte ballooning and lobular inflammation; a histologically severe disease was defined as a SAF activity score of ≥3 and/or bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. Clinical, biochemical, and metabolic data were analyzed in relation to histology.

RESULTS

Patients with NASH according to the FLIP algorithm had a clinical profile distinct from those with NAFL, with a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors (increased body mass index [BMI], central obesity, serum glucose, and glycated hemoglobin), more severe insulin resistance (fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] values), and higher levels of aminotransferases. Similar findings were documented for patients with severe disease vs. those without. Positive linear trends existed between NASH or severe disease and increasing BMI and HOMA-IR. There was a strong association between liver fibrosis and NASH or SAF-defined scores of activity. Patients with either significant or bridging fibrosis overwhelmingly had NASH, and bridging fibrosis most often coexisted with severe activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLIP algorithm/SAF score, although based on purely morphological grounds, are clinically relevant, as they identify patients with distinct clinical and biological profiles of disease severity. Disease activity in NAFLD is associated with fibrosis severity.

LAY SUMMARY

The examination of liver tissue under the microscope (histology) serves to define the type and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease morphologically, and is also used to determine improvement in therapeutic or natural history clinical trials. The FLIP algorithm/SAF classification is a new histological classification well validated on morphological but not clinical grounds. Here, we demonstrate that different disease categories defined by the FLIP/SAF classification correspond to entities of different clinical and biological severity. We also show a strong association between the activity of steatohepatitis (defined histologically) and the amount of fibrotic scar.

摘要

背景与目的

用于诊断/分期非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的组织学分类基于形态学,其临床相关性尚不明确。我们评估了脂肪肝进展抑制(FLIP)算法以及脂肪变性、活动度和纤维化(SAF)评分系统的临床相关性。

方法

纳入140例连续的疑似NAFLD患者以及另一个由78例参与治疗试验的患者组成的验证队列,所有患者的肝活检均进行集中阅片。使用FLIP和SAF对非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)、非NASH的NAFLD(NAFL)或非NAFLD患者进行分类。SAF活动度评分评估肝细胞气球样变和小叶炎症;组织学上的严重疾病定义为SAF活动度评分≥3和/或桥接纤维化或肝硬化。分析临床、生化和代谢数据与组织学的关系。

结果

根据FLIP算法诊断为NASH的患者具有与NAFL患者不同的临床特征,代谢危险因素(体重指数[BMI]增加、中心性肥胖、血清葡萄糖和糖化血红蛋白升高)的患病率更高,胰岛素抵抗更严重(空腹胰岛素和胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估[HOMA-IR]值),转氨酶水平更高。对于患有严重疾病和未患严重疾病的患者也有类似发现。NASH或严重疾病与BMI和HOMA-IR升高之间存在正线性趋势。肝纤维化与NASH或SAF定义的活动度评分之间存在很强的关联。有显著纤维化或桥接纤维化的患者绝大多数患有NASH,桥接纤维化最常与严重活动度并存。

结论

FLIP算法/SAF评分虽然完全基于形态学依据,但具有临床相关性,因为它们能识别出具有不同疾病严重程度的临床和生物学特征的患者。NAFLD中的疾病活动度与纤维化严重程度相关。

简要概述

在显微镜下检查肝组织(组织学)有助于从形态学上定义非酒精性脂肪性肝病的类型和严重程度,也用于确定治疗性或自然史临床试验中的改善情况。FLIP算法/SAF分类是一种新的组织学分类,在形态学方面得到了充分验证,但在临床方面尚未得到验证。在此,我们证明了由FLIP/SAF分类定义的不同疾病类别对应于不同临床和生物学严重程度的实体。我们还显示了脂肪性肝炎的活动度(组织学定义)与纤维化瘢痕量之间存在很强的关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验