• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

只需加水?与水相比,氯己定在盐水中的稀释对其抗菌性能的影响较小。

Just add water? Chlorhexidine's antimicrobial properties are minimally affected by dilution in saline compared to water.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):613-615. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02609-x. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-019-02609-x
PMID:31863271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dilute chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in sterile water is an antiseptic solution approved for intraoperative wound irrigation by the United States Food and Drug Administration. In practice, however, CHG is commonly diluted with normal saline, which can result in its precipitation potentially reducing the antimicrobial effect. The purpose of this study was to determine if the antimicrobial properties of CHG are reduced after dilution with normal saline compared to sterile water.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sterile paper disks were placed into undiluted 4% CHG (positive control), 0.05% CHG in sterile water, 0.05% CHG in normal saline, or normal saline alone (negative control) and then placed in triplicate onto the agar plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus. After incubating at 37 °C for 24 h, the diameter of the zone of inhibition around each disk was measured.

RESULTS

The mean zone of inhibition for 4% CHG, 0.05% CHG in sterile water, 0.05% CHG in normal saline, and normal saline alone was 24 ± 0.6 mm, 16 ± 0.9 mm, 14 ± 0.5 mm, and 0 ± 0 mm, respectively (p < 0.01). The zone of inhibition for dilute CHG in normal saline was on average 2.5 mm less (95% CI 1.7-3.2 mm) than that of CHG in sterile water.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilute CHG in normal saline, versus sterile water, retained its antimicrobial activity with a small reduction in the zone of inhibition. Surgeons and scientists should be aware of the interaction between normal saline and CHG. Future scientific studies need to control for what solution is used for dilution.

摘要

背景

稀盐酸葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)在无菌水中是一种经美国食品和药物管理局批准用于术中伤口冲洗的消毒剂。然而,在实践中,CHG 通常用生理盐水稀释,这可能导致其沉淀,从而降低抗菌效果。本研究旨在确定与无菌水相比,CHG 用生理盐水稀释后其抗菌性能是否降低。

材料和方法

无菌纸片分别置于未经稀释的 4%CHG(阳性对照)、无菌水中的 0.05%CHG、生理盐水中的 0.05%CHG 和生理盐水(阴性对照)中,然后将每个纸片的三份重复放入接种金黄色葡萄球菌的琼脂平板上。孵育 37°C 24 小时后,测量每个纸片周围抑菌圈的直径。

结果

4%CHG、无菌水中的 0.05%CHG、生理盐水中的 0.05%CHG 和生理盐水的平均抑菌圈直径分别为 24±0.6mm、16±0.9mm、14±0.5mm 和 0±0mm(p<0.01)。与无菌水中的 CHG 相比,生理盐水中稀释的 CHG 的抑菌圈平均小 2.5mm(95%CI 1.7-3.2mm)。

结论

与无菌水相比,生理盐水稀释的 CHG 保持了其抗菌活性,抑菌圈略有缩小。外科医生和科学家应注意生理盐水和 CHG 之间的相互作用。未来的科学研究需要控制稀释所用的溶液。

相似文献

1
Just add water? Chlorhexidine's antimicrobial properties are minimally affected by dilution in saline compared to water.只需加水?与水相比,氯己定在盐水中的稀释对其抗菌性能的影响较小。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):613-615. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02609-x. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
2
Minocycline-rifampin-impregnated penile prosthesis surfaces retain antimicrobial activity following irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate and antibiotic solutions.米诺环素-利福平浸渍的阴茎假体表面在 0.05%葡萄糖酸氯己定和抗生素溶液冲洗后保持抗菌活性。
J Sex Med. 2024 Sep 3;21(9):823-826. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae093.
3
Antibiotic dip and irrigation solutions confer increased antimicrobial efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis hydrophilic surfaces compared with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate.与 0.05%葡萄糖酸氯己定相比,抗生素浸泡和冲洗溶液可提高充气式阴茎假体亲水表面的抗菌效果。
J Sex Med. 2024 Sep 3;21(9):816-822. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae073.
4
Wound Irrigation with Chlorhexidine Gluconate Reduces Surgical Site Infection in Pilonidal Disease: Single-Blind Prospective Study.聚维酮碘冲洗在减少藏毛窦疾病术后感染的应用:单盲前瞻性研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;21(2):143-149. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.053. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Preliminary analysis of the antimicrobial activity of a postoperative wound dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vivo porcine incisional wound model.含葡萄糖酸洗必泰的术后伤口敷料对体内猪切口伤口模型中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌活性的初步分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Sep;47(9):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of residual chlorhexidine gluconate on skin following repetitive exposure to saline and wiping with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol pre-operative skin preparations.重复暴露于生理盐水后,使用 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定/70%异丙醇术前皮肤准备擦拭对皮肤残留葡萄糖酸氯己定的离体和体内评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Jul;102(3):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Evaluation of activity and potential for development of antimicrobial resistance to a new tinted 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol film-forming sterile preoperative skin preparation.评价新型有色 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定/70%异丙醇成膜无菌术前皮肤准备制剂的抗菌活性和耐药潜力。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Jun;17:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Effect of chlorhexidine gluconate on mechanical and anti-microbial properties of thermoplastic cassava starch.葡萄糖酸氯己定对热塑性木薯淀粉的机械性能和抗菌性能的影响。
Carbohydr Polym. 2022 Jan 1;275:118690. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118690. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Chlorhexidine gluconate demonstrates short-term efficacy and long-term cytotoxicity.拆东墙补西墙:葡萄糖酸氯己定显示出短期疗效和长期细胞毒性。
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Sep;30(5):573-584. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13044. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Comparison of the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine and saline for irrigating a contaminated open fracture model.比较洗必泰和生理盐水冲洗污染开放性骨折模型的抗菌效果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Dec;26(12):728-32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826c19c4.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of clipping on bacterial contamination of canine arthrocentesis sites before and after skin preparation.剪毛对皮肤准备前后犬关节穿刺部位细菌污染的影响。
Vet Surg. 2020 Oct;49(7):1307-1314. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13468. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using Antimicrobials: Dilute Povidone-Iodine Lavage.使用抗菌药物治疗人工关节周围感染:稀释聚维酮碘灌洗
J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Jan 1;2(1):10-14. doi: 10.7150/jbji.16448. eCollection 2017.
2
A Trial of Wound Irrigation in the Initial Management of Open Fracture Wounds.开放性骨折伤口初次处理的冲洗试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 31;373(27):2629-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508502. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
3
Peritoneal lavage using chlorhexidine gluconate at the end of colon surgery reduces postoperative intra-abdominal infection in mice.
结肠手术结束时使用葡萄糖酸氯己定进行腹腔灌洗可降低小鼠术后腹腔内感染的发生率。
J Surg Res. 2015 May 1;195(1):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Effect of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate predisinfection skin scrub prior to hepatectomy: a double-blinded, randomized control study.肝切除术前使用4%葡萄糖酸氯己定进行皮肤预消毒擦洗的效果:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Int Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;99(6):787-94. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00179.1.
5
Diluting chlorhexidine gluconate: one scrub or two?稀释葡萄糖酸洗必泰:一次擦洗还是两次?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):544-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.120. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Surgical wound irrigation: a call for evidence-based standardization of practice.手术伤口冲洗:呼吁基于证据的实践标准化。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 May;42(5):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.012.
7
Selection of an optimal antiseptic solution for intraoperative irrigation: an in vitro study.术中冲洗最佳防腐溶液的选择:一项体外研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):285-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00313.
8
Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: does chlorhexidine gluconate provide a risk reduction benefit?降低手术部位感染风险:葡萄糖酸洗必泰是否具有降低风险的益处?
Am J Infect Control. 2013 May;41(5 Suppl):S49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.030.
9
Interactions between irrigants commonly used in endodontic practice: a chemical analysis.根管冲洗剂在根管治疗中的应用:化学分析。
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.050. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Comparison of the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine and saline for irrigating a contaminated open fracture model.比较洗必泰和生理盐水冲洗污染开放性骨折模型的抗菌效果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Dec;26(12):728-32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826c19c4.